Print
Email
Share

Russian company may bid on Air Force tanker

by CNN

KING5.com

Posted on March 21, 2010 at 12:32 PM

WASHINGTON, D.C. - A new twist in the Air Force's 10-year effort to build an aerial refueling tanker may bring a bid from a Russian state-owned aerospace company for the $35 billion tanker contract, according to the company's U.S. attorney.

The company, United Aircraft Corporation will create a joint venture between a still to be announced U.S. contract company and UAC-America, according to John C. Kirkland, a Los Angeles, California-based lawyer representing UAC. Kirkland would not identify the American partner.

"The Russians spoke with Hillary Clinton today about it," Kirkland said.

While no mention was made of the tanker bid by either Secretary of State Clinton or Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin when they met Friday, Putin did urge greater access for Russian companies in the U.S. market.

"As far as our economic cooperation is concerned, certainly our major companies are very much interested in such a cooperation and they're expecting us to support them," Putin said to Clinton. "A message should be sent that they are welcome both in the economy of the United States and of Russia."

"We would very much like to get into specifics about how to remove barriers and open opportunities," replied Clinton.

The Russian-American joint venture would be based in Los Angeles, Kirkland said, but he said the aircraft could be built anywhere in the country.

Kirkland said the aircraft the company would put forward is based on the Russian Ilyushin Il-96, a four-engine commercial airliner.

Also on Friday, European aircraft maker EADS said it remains interested in bidding the tanker contract despite its U.S. partner, Northrop-Grumman, dropping out of the competition earlier this month.

"Yesterday the U.S. Department of Defense indicated it would welcome a proposal from EADS North America as prime contractor for the KC-X tanker competition," EADS said Friday.

"This is a significant development. EADS is assessing this new situation to determine if the company can feasibly submit a responsive proposal to the department's request for proposal," the company said.

Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said the Department of Defense has received a request by EADS to extend the time to submit a proposal by 90 days.

"The department is considering it," Whitman said.

Until Friday's announcement, Boeing was the only company to bid on the contract.

Northrop and European partner EADS, the parent company of Airbus, originally won the contract in February 2008, but a protest by Boeing reversed that decision, forcing the Air Force to change the requirements for the plane. Northrop dropped its bid on March 8.

Print
Email
Share

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 6 of 6

comiccon2010 said on March 21, 2010 at 4:24 PM

boeing needs to leave the state, they are a joke.

39708127
Flag this comment

pixelater said on March 21, 2010 at 2:21 PM

Just wrong in so many ways.

39703558
Flag this comment

cstaats963204697 said on March 21, 2010 at 12:35 PM

It will be the best for Boeing to have a competitor in the bidding process. As long as the bid is fair I have no doubt Boeing will win.

39699836
Flag this comment

telman said on March 21, 2010 at 7:12 AM

Our Head Red lets the Ruskies drill in the Gulf of Mexico, Why wouldn't he let them build our airplanes? He and Putin are two peas in a pod, closet dictators.

39688019
Flag this comment

madblkviper said on March 21, 2010 at 5:43 AM

You have got to be kidding me! I know this is a global economy but to put the defense of our country into another counrty, that is totally crazy. We talk about american made and how we need to keep our own people employed, but yet we would ship our jobs overseas. Not even considering the jobs why would we consider building the cofers of another country with the tax payer dollar. For all the smart people that suppose to be in Washington looking out for the welfare of this nation seems like they are doing more and more to put our country into thier hands.

39684487
Flag this comment

rnl52 said on March 20, 2010 at 4:20 PM

Only US companies! Geez, I can't believe this. Do away with WTO, NAFTA etc..

39668411
Flag this comment

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?

Register Now

Member Benefits

Link your account to your Twitter or Facebook account for easier login!

Link your account to your Facebook profile Link your account to your Twitter profile

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

* - Indicates required field

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

Connecting to

You may need to allow pop up window for this step of registration

Just one more step:

Please take a moment to review the available e-mail newsletters has to offer. Place a checkbox next to the newsletters you wish to subscribe to.

Welcome.

Thank you for becoming a member of KING5.com. You now have full access to the best local coverage and late breaking news from KING5.com. Soon you will be redirected to the page you were seeking, and a confirmation email will be delivered to you.

You will need to respond to the confirmation e-mail for your account to be activated.

KING5.com is dedicated to bringing you exceptional news and outstanding information services, all while personalizing it to your liking. We're sure you'll enjoy being a KING5.com member! If you need assistance, please contact us.