Print
Email
Share

Gay marriage in pioneer state, Massachusetts, part of everyday life

by JOE FRYER / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @joefryer

KING5.com

Posted on February 13, 2012 at 7:19 PM

Updated Tuesday, Feb 14 at 9:30 AM

BOSTON -- As Washington state became the seventh state to legalize same-sex marriage Monday, the first state, Massachusetts, neared eight years of gay nuptials.

Many couples who have tied the knot there say they've faced little opposition.

"It's not a news story here anymore," said Maureen Brodoff, who took part in the groundbreaking lawsuit that led to gay marriage in Massachusetts.

Brodoff and Ellen Wade, together now for more than 30 years, joined six other gay and lesbian couples in suing the state of Massachusetts about 10 years ago.  In 2003, the state's supreme court ruled in their favor.

"I don't think we really were counting on it or thought it was all that likely," Wade said. "We were pretty surprised and thrilled."

On May 17, 2004, the first day same-sex couples could marry in Massachusetts, Wade and Brodoff tied the knot, surrounded by a small group of friends and family inside Newton City Hall.  When they walked outside into the blinding sunlight, they were greeted by a huge group of strangers and cameras.

"We were so happy," Wade said. "Everyone was so happy."

Nearly eight years later, they claim their life is quite normal.

"I can't think of a negative experience," Brodoff laughed. "It's really dull."

Marlin Nabors and Jonathan Knight, a gay couple that married more than five years ago, would agree.

"It's exceedingly average," Nabors said. "I don't hear a large gasp or large reaction if I say, 'My husband,' or that I'm married to a man."

Since 2004, it is estimated that at least 16,000 same-sex couples, likely more, have tied the knot in Massachusetts.

For Janet Benzan, a Justice of the Peace, those weddings are a regular source of work. About half of her weddings are now same-sex couples, and half of those ceremonies are couples that come from out of state.

"It's opened my eyes," Benzan said.

But she has heard that some justices of the peace do not share her views.

"I had one couple who told me that they were asked to provide an HIV test," she said. "Tears came to my eyes when I heard that."

While opponents of gay marriage may not be in the limelight in Massachusetts, they have not disappeared. 

The Massachusetts Family Institute continues to oppose the marriages. Despite efforts by that group and other opponents of gay marriage to put the issue on the ballot in Massachusetts, state lawmakers have not done so. Over the years, some state lawmakers who initially opposed same-sex marriage have since changed their mind. And unlike Washington, petitions are not an option.

"It's an unsettled issue in Massachusetts," said Kris Mineau of the Massachusetts Family Institute.  "Until the people vote, the people are not really satisfied, nor are their rights being met."

But Wade and Brodoff believe the issue is largely settled. They are now thinking about Brodoff's sister in Washington, a lesbian who has been with her partner for several years, hoping they can soon tie the knot.

"I think it's eventually going to be available to everybody everywhere," Wade said.  "It's a matter of time."

Like the law passed in Washington, churches and other religious organizations in Massachusetts are not required to perform same-sex marriages. Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, a New England legal group that supports gay rights, agrees with the law, saying that churches should be allowed to address the issue on their own.  But Mineau is concerned that over time, there could be a legal showdown over churches and gay marriage.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 3 of 3

topazgirl said on February 16, 2012 at 3:25 AM

topazgirl avatar

It is so heartening to hear Massachussetts say that it is only a matter of time before the rest of the states follow suit... I have always believed that, so it is good to hear their affirmation! Let the churches do their own thing, if they are opposed to same-sex marriage, as long as gays have a legal right to marry in other venues. Some churches will come around; some already have! I am a bit embarrassed by many of our backward-thinking citizens here on the West Coast... I always thought we were more progressive than that. Thank-you, Massachussetts, for leading the way!,,,<3<3

81455989
Flag this comment

CraigLSeattle said on February 14, 2012 at 6:42 PM

I appreciate your story about what same sex marriage will mean to Washington residents, your piece about Federal Taxes is misleading. Because of Domestic Partnership benefits already granted, the Federal tax laws for registered DP's in Washington, as well as Nevada and California have to file jointly because of community property laws in these three states. It can be confusing to hear your story talking about filing as single when in fact it's illegal if you are a registered couple. The tax preparer at Your Man Friday can make this much clearer for you.

81387326
Flag this comment

JohnnyPleasure said on February 14, 2012 at 2:02 PM

JohnnyPleasure avatar

This is a remarkable since non-forcible sodomy, even among heterosexual married couples, was a felony in most state's prior to 1970.

81374629
Flag this comment