Share this article:
Print

Canine at center of cross-country controversy

Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

by TRICIA MANNING-SMITH / KING 5 News

Posted on November 24, 2009 at 7:12 PM

******

CAMANO ISLAND, Wash. - A Camano Island dog, named Franklin, has become the focal point of a passionate cross-country controversy.

Some dog lovers feel he is unfairly stuck in captivity, and they want him adopted out.

Franklin is a relatively rare breed, a Thai Ridgeback, who stole Sarah Connor's heart.

"He's just so gorgeous," said Connor, who lives on Camano Island. "He was just wonderful and I fell in love."

But Connor's adoption of Franklin fell through because she didn't have a secure fence. She admits Franklin "comes on" a bit strong.

"He appears a little intimidating. He has a very, very loud bark. I can see, when someone looks at him, they might be intimidated by that," said Connor.

Indeed, Franklin's demeanor did concern some Camano Island residents, who e-mailed CASA (Camano Animal Shelter Association) board members.

Board members say the e-mailers labeled the dog as "aggressive," although he has never bitten anyone. The Island County Sheriff's Department confirms they have no reports against Franklin.

"He is no longer up for adoption until we can evaluate him and determine that he is truly adoptable to the public," said board member Carol Wilkerson.

CASA Board Pro-Tem President Barbara Peterson expresses affection for the dog, saying she would adopt him herself if she could. Both board members confirm that the public is not allowed access to Franklin, that he is attended to only by board members or staff. They would not detail the e-mail allegations that lead to CASA's concern about Franklin.

According to CASA, Franklin has gotten around in his three short years. He was bred in California and originally adopted by a Floridian. CASA doesn't know what compelled Franklin's Florida owner to return the dog to its breeder. Then, from California Franklin was apparently purchased again, this time by an owner in Washington State.

However, Franklin was picked up as a stray on Camano Island and brought to the CASA shelter. His owner never claimed him. Franklin was originally up for adoption there, when Sarah Connor met him. But the dog's status has since changed to presently unadoptable.

CASA's board says he will stay there until he's evaluated by an animal behavioralist. That evaluation will determine whether Franklin will go to a dog sanctuary, a rescue group, or ultimately be adopted.

Franklin has already been at the CASA shelter at least five months.

In the meantime, animal rescuers in Illinois got on the case, and created a Web site devoted to Franklin's freedom (www.free-franklin.com).

Jessica Ingles, Rescue Coordinator for Thai Ridgeback Dogs of the U.S.A. feels Franklin is unfairly targeted. She says hundreds of people signed the organization's petition urging CASA to release the dog to them. Rescuers say they are even willing to sign a waiver.

But CASA Board Pro-Tem President Barbara Peterson responds: "We don't want any doubt. We don't want to be worried about liability, that we didn't do our full job."

Peterson and Wilkerson confirm that Franklin's case contributed to the resignations of two of their colleagues on the CASA board.

Sarah Connor admits, she gets emotional over Franklin's plight.

"I just think it's incredibly sad that we can't find him a good home," she said.

Share this article:
Print

To add a comment, please register or login.

Leave your comment
1000 characters remaining

Submit

Remember Please be respectful of others when posting comments. Play nice. IP addresses are logged and can be banned.

HTML is not allowed.

robminimarts said on November 24, 2009 at 8:06 PM

http://free-franklin.com Go there, sign the petition and show that you care about Franklin. The "hoops" that the shelter's board of directors are making Franklin jump through are irregular and unjust. They do not require a behavioralist for any other dog, why do they need one for this animal ? It's a waste of what I am sure is valuable shelter revenue that could go to a hundred other useful things to help those animals.

shemomo said on November 24, 2009 at 9:15 PM

He does not look aggressive to me... he is barking, yes, but not in an aggressive way... looks like he just needs a good home and out of the shelter!

kindearth said on November 25, 2009 at 3:03 AM

I just signed the petition! http://free-franklin.com/

camanodog said on November 25, 2009 at 8:07 AM

I find it odd that the staff and the shelter manager are never mentioned at all anywhere in this, is this Board of Directors paying attention to the people who actually care for and oversee this dog? I don't think a Board of Directors should be running a shelter or making decisions on animals. Staff are hired because of qualifications are board members? A friend of mine who is a volunteer said the staff and manager both want this dog to go to the rescue and do not feel this dog is dangerous at all, maybe that is why they are not letting them speak.

robminimarts said on November 25, 2009 at 12:52 PM

People need to make the distiction between the actions of the board of directors and the staff/volunteers at this facility. The Board of Directors at CASA are the ones who have gone to such lengths to keep this animal from finding a home. The staff and volunteers have voiced their opinions since day one that Franklin is a good dog and deserves to find a good home. Many shelters have these kinds of issues and it's always hard to differentiate who is really responsible for the ignorance.

3dognite said on November 26, 2009 at 5:01 PM

In a private shelter it is the Board who makes decisions like these. And why be so careful? Because each member can be held personally liable for any aftermath. It's not like a public shelter, where, if a mistake is made, an injured party can sue the deep pockets of the city/county, etc. If a party sues here, board members could be sued personally. I am sure they must wonder if it's all worth it. They are volunteering their time. Let's not forget that. None of us on the outside know the whole story. Thanks to King5 we got 2 minutes of a 5-month saga. Anyone who wants to criticize or thinks there's an easy solution to this mess might consider running for a board position. I understand elections are being held soon. Warning: It's one of most difficult and thankless jobs you'll ever have. I hope the behaviorist can sort this out and clear the way for a decision to get this dog out of the shelter one way or another. Sad to think of him there month after month. Miserable for all involve

camanodog said on November 27, 2009 at 9:02 AM

NO, it is NOT the job of the Board of Directors to choose which dogs live, die, or transfer. It is the job of the shelter Manager they choose to hire. I have met the current one, she is quite educated when it comes to dogs. Look her up her name is Teagan Locker

doggiepies said on November 27, 2009 at 7:43 PM

Board members arent the only ones in "thankless jobs''. when one takes a position at an animal shelter, paid or unpaid, you should do it because you love animals....the staff doesnt get paid much and are expected to volunteer a lot of time. what other job can you make paid staff work for free??? everyone should be in this for the best interest of all animals. any dog can bite at any time, should the shelter call everyone who has adopted dogs and take them back, because they "might" bite? if this dog passed the shelter's required temperment test, then that should be enough. if you don't trust the people you've hired to do the job, then fire them and pay yourselves to do it. i don't think anyone on the board would last a week.