| Currently | Doppler | Live Cams | ||
|
|
|
||
| Forecast | 5-day | Closings/Delays | Traffic Report | ||||
Trial date uncertain
05:25 PM PST on Friday, February 18, 2005
OLYMPIA, Wash. - The Republicans' challenge to the election of Gov.
Christine Gregoire will move forward in Chelan County Superior Court,
but it may not move very quickly.
Judge John E. Bridges signed an order Friday in Wenatchee, confirming
several rulings he made at a hearing two weeks ago.
Republicans asked for an April 4 trial date, but Bridges said he wants
both sides to finish their legal fact-finding before he sets a date.
That could take weeks, or months.
Democrats had asked the judge to clarify what, exactly, the Republicans
need to prove to win their case. But Bridges said he thought he was
plenty clear at the previous hearing. He stiff-armed the Democrats'
attempt to more narrowly define the standard of proof that Republicans
will have to meet.
KING Judge John Bridges
However, Bridges said he wants to answer that question before the trial.
He invited the Democrats' lawyer to make a motion and submit a brief,
aiming for a hearing sometime in the next three weeks.
Republican Dino Rossi and the state Republican Party filed the election
challenge in Chelan County last month, seeking to nullify Gregoire's
129-vote victory. They sued Secretary of State Sam Reed, who's a
Republican, and all 39 counties. The state Democratic Party intervened
to defend the election.
Republicans argue that hundreds of illegal votes and election worker
errors make it impossible to know who the true winner was, so there
should be a new election.
Democrats say that while the election had some flaws, it was accurate
and Gregoire is the legitimately elected governor.
Both sides say they want a speedy trial and accuse the other of
foot-dragging.
"The Democrats got totally shut down" on Friday, Rossi spokeswoman Mary
Lane said. "They keep trying to delay or limit our case and they keep
failing." Democrats complained that Republicans haven't handed over the
list of allegedly illegal voters, as the Democrats have requested.
"Until the petitioners stop playing hide-the-ball it's awfully difficult
to talk about a trial date," said Kevin Hamilton, a lawyer representing
the Democrats.
Republicans pointed out that they have until Tuesday to respond to the
Democrats' discovery request.
"It's hard to drag our feet when they're not even due yet," said Harry
Korrell, lawyer for the Republican Party. He said the Republicans have
also requested, and have not yet gotten, information about possibly
illegal voters that Democrats have identified.
"If you show us your stuff, we'll show you our stuff," Korrell said.
On Friday, Bridges signed the Republicans' proposed order, which stated
which motions were denied and which were granted, and included the
transcript of the judge's ruling on Feb. 4.
The next step will likely be a hearing to decide what Republicans will
have to prove to win their case.
State law says to win an election contest, you have to show that illegal
votes or election workers' errors changed the outcome of the election.
The question is, how? Democrats say the standard is strict: Republicans
must match every illegal vote with a voter and a candidate, and then
subtract the exact number of illegal votes from each candidate's total.
That might mean asking felons, under oath, how they cast their illegal
ballot.
Republicans say that burden of proof would be impossible to meet, and
would render the election challenge statute unusable.
They have two theories. First, they say it's enough to show that the
number of illegally cast ballots is greater than the 129-vote margin of
victory.
Failing that, the GOP will argue that it should be able to present
circumstantial evidence to show how illegal ballots were cast. For
example, if 10 illegal ballots were cast in a precinct that voted 60
percent for Gregoire and 40 percent for Rossi, six votes would be
subtracted from Gregoire's total and four from Rossi's total.
Just to make things interesting, both sides can point to a Washington
State Supreme Court decision that backs their position.
The order Bridges signed Friday confirmed these rulings: denying the
Democrats' motions to dismiss the case or move it to the Legislature;
granting the Democrats' motion to take the "revote" option off the table
if the Republicans win; and granting the counties' requests to be
dismissed from the case.
Bridges allowed counties to continue as defendants if they chose. Most
county attorneys, overwhelmed by the mountains of paperwork in the case,
gladly dropped out. But four counties - Chelan, Klickitat, Lewis and
Snohomish - decided to stay.
Most Read
Most Recommended
Most Commented
![]() | Used cars | Advice Sell a car Find a dealer |
![]() | ½ Price Deals Buy ½ price certificates here |
![]() | Looking for a great local job or a great local employee? »Click here to search |
![]() | Use our home search or condo map »Find a home »Explore new condos |












You must be logged in to contribute. Log in | Register Now!
You are logged in as screenname | Log Out
You are logged in, but do not have a "screen" name. Create a Screen Name