Print
Email
Share

Up Front: To park or not to park

by KING 5 News Up Front

KING5.com

Posted on January 17, 2010 at 11:06 AM

Updated Sunday, Jan 17 at 6:21 PM

When it comes to Sound Transit's light rail stations in Seattle, walking, biking or even busing to them works. But what happens if you want to drive and park near a station?

KING 5 Investigator Linda Byron discovered that Seattle has set up a series of roadblocks to driving and parking near light rail stations in the city limits. If you try to find street parking, you will find it both scarce and time limited so commuters will find parking difficult, if not impossible. When entrepreneurs tried to satisfy the demand for parking by making their lots available on a daily and long-term basis, the city said they were in violation of city ordinances.

New Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn issued an executive order that stops enforcement of the parking ban. He now has 30 days to come up with an alternative proposal.

What will McGinn propose? There are some hints on his blog. He writes in part: “As I stated when I announced my position, I certainly don’t support construction of new parking structures, tearing down buildings for parking lots, or letting station areas turn into a sea of parking lots. None of these is a good long-term outcome. On the other hand, the current economy means we are not going to see existing parking lots converted to new development anytime soon. As an interim measure, allowing all-day paid parking gives us some benefits.”

The larger issue is one that critics have needled Seattle laws and lawmakers about for years. From plastic bags, to recycling, to parking and driving, is Seattle government trying to turn Seattle into a “nanny” state, where the law is used to micro-manage resident behavior? Let us know what you think.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 10 of 10

1sanman1 said on January 18, 2010 at 12:25 PM

This just shows how STUPID Sound transit execs and city officials can be if they cannot apply COMMON SENSE when spending millions, if not billions of taxpayer money. For light rail to be used effectively, it needs to be accessible as people like to get places quickly. For many people living along the Lake Washington neighborhoods, such as Leschi, Mt. Baker, Seward Park, Rainier Beach, it would be faster to drive and not take light rail. Bus systems must be revised, perhaps have neighborhood shuttles to/from adjacent neighborhoods to light rail stations. The Common Sense of Park n Rides allows for people to take light rail for the majority of their trips resulting in less cars on freeways and on main arterials such as Martin Luther King Jr. Way. Park n Rides do not have to be right on top of the stations, but if located within a quarter of a mile or so still allows accessibility for those who will use the Park n Rides. Business can still be placed "ontop' of the stations.

35859804
Flag this comment

unbelievable said on January 18, 2010 at 8:27 AM

And the city wonders why people arent' taking the light rail???

35844397
Flag this comment

ltrailsupporter said on January 18, 2010 at 1:21 AM

Congratulations on your coverage of this story. This is one of the first times recently that I have seen common sense used to restudy a problem. It is good to have long range plans based on idealistic goals to provide a well planned transit system. Unfortunately Seattles' growth pattern has not been built around existing transit systems which connected and maintained the life of active communites. It takes time and a lot of compromise to overlay a new order to an existing one. Please allow the process time to evolve and embrace these changes in a natural way rather than imposing narrow focused mandates that could alienate and destroy what has been done already. People need time to change their patterns. Getting people from their homes to the light rail station is a big step. MAKE IT AS EASY AS POSSIBLE. The second step of riding a bike or taking another bus to the station will occur in time, but only if people think of it as easy. The best systems have grown over time.

35831554
Flag this comment

n7unn said on January 18, 2010 at 1:08 AM

We need toget the bus service to change to service the link.rail stations. Most all bus routes are set up to service the downtown area. We need to set up a transit center for bus at the light stations. The light stations outside the city, or terminal area ear to have limited parking for the out of towners to park. The buses had park N Ride areas for service. Lets make the bus routes feed these areas and light rail station will become area of neighborhood stores and housing. You don't need to have a bunch of apartments and condos dominate the area, but you must allow the area to develop equally and slowly eliminate large parking lots for the light rail and buses. The bus routes must change also to the needs of the people to allow them to get there from their homes. Let us look how other cities with light rail have developed there routes. The BART System is quite an area covered from Pleasanton, Walnut Creek, Fremont, and MillBrae Thru San Francisco. With Buses from and to there.

35831369
Flag this comment

flipper51 said on January 18, 2010 at 12:54 AM

This light rail system was sold to us in comparison with the one in Denver and Portland. Well, the Denver light rail has sufficient PARKING incorporated with most/all of its stops so those who don't live in the commune/cluster right off the light rail can DRIVE and make use of light rail as well. If you don't make it adequately available to ALL of us, then don't bellyache when it's not making the money and drawing the passengers you projected. And don't raise my taxes when you don't get your projections either.

35831114
Flag this comment

kcasb5 said on January 18, 2010 at 12:42 AM

I agree with Mr. McGinn and the business around the Sound Transit stations should be able to provide paid parking on their property. Since Sound Transit took some of the businesses' properties away by way of "eminent domain", I think it is right for them to provide all-day parking in their lots, and recoupe their "losses". I live where there is a 2 hr limit sign and nobody is parking around here because of it. If one was to park here, it would be to visit my neighborhood. But because of the 2 hr limit, no one really wants to park here any longer, so actually there isn't any cars in the neighborhood during the day. I think if parking was available at the businesses around here for people who are interested in riding the rail, then there would be more riders and Sound Transit would be used more.

35830974
Flag this comment

jrehnborn said on January 18, 2010 at 12:00 AM

If you want people to take the light rain, YOU MUST PROVIDE OFF STREET PARKING. Park and light rail GETS PEOPLE OUT OF THEIR CAR FOR PART OF THE TRIP. Let the non-residential business make their own decision whether they want to offer paid parking. KEEP THE CITY OUT OF IT. I lived and worked in Chicago for many years with one of the best transportations systems in the US. They had the foresight to provide parking for cars near the stations. Many of us drove every day to the station. If we had to take the bus or ride a bike to the station, we would have chosen to just drive the entire trip. San Francisco also provides parking at their stations.

35830102
Flag this comment

nickc said on January 17, 2010 at 10:03 PM

The hole purposes for building light rail was to get people out of there cars and walk, ride the bike or taking the bus to the light rail station. By making people walk, ride there bike or take the bus saves you money in more way's then one.. It Saves you money on gas, parking fees, your health and soon; and if your wondering how it helps with your health well your not getting in your car which improves air quality, and bad air quality has a negative effect on your respiratory system ( lungs and airways ) and on your cardiovascular system ( heart function and blood circulation) by; * making it harder to breath, * irritating your respiratory system, * triggering episodes of asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases (COPD); chronic bronchitis and emphysema; * triggering episodes of heart conditions (angina, heart attack, heart failure and heart rhythm problems). You are also walking to the train station, bus stop or riding your bike which equals exercise.......

35826557
Flag this comment

szalexan said on January 17, 2010 at 9:38 PM

The fines should be returned to Safeway, UW, and others who have parking lots close to light rail. The populace cannot change their habits overnight. For now, driving to a nearby lot, parking, then taking light rail to their destination makes perfect sense. Some may bike or take the bus. But, let's face it, there aren't enough miles of light rail yet to make it really convenient for most of us to get on it. Once it goes to Northgate, UW, and across Lake Washington many more of us will not have to drive to reach the stations. Our new mayor Mike McGinn made a good decision allowing paid parking close to light rail stations. Let's encourage more riders!

35825762
Flag this comment

shirleyj said on January 17, 2010 at 12:35 PM

I believe that long term parking should be limited for light rail. The Seattle Planning Commission should continue to follow its policy of encouraging walking and bicycling to the light rail facilities. Dense development should continue to be encouraged as a long term goal along the right of way. I am now retired but worked in downtown Seattle for many years, and for many years commuted by bicycle from Issaquah to Seattle, alterating with riding the bus. If employers realized how much energy and sense well being biycling induced they would require bicycling among their staff. People should be encouraged to do the right thing by the media. Don't focus on the negative. Do the leg work that reporting requires and talk to the people who are finding their own creative ways of getting to the light rail lines.

35803517
Flag this comment