Print
Email
Share

AT&T customers surprised by 'unlimited data' limit

AT&T customers surprised by 'unlimited data' limit

Credit: AP

AT&T customers surprised by 'unlimited data' limit

by Associated Press

KING5.com

Posted on February 13, 2012 at 10:22 AM

NEW YORK -- Mike Trang likes to use his iPhone 4 as a GPS device, helping him get around in his job. Now and then, his younger cousins get ahold of it, and play some YouTube videos and games.

But in the past few weeks, there has been none of that, because AT&T Inc. put a virtual wheel clamp on his phone. Web pages wouldn't load and maps wouldn't render. Forget about YouTube videos -- Trang's data speeds were reduced to dial-up levels.

"It basically makes my phone useless," said Trang, an Orange County, Calif. property manager.

The reason: AT&T considers Trang to be among the top 5 percent of the heaviest cellular data users in his area. Under a new policy, AT&T has started cutting their data speeds as part of an attempt to manage data usage on its network.

So last month, AT&T "throttled" Trang's iPhone, slowing downloads by roughly 99 percent. That means a Web page that would normally take a second to load instead took almost two minutes.

AT&T has some 17 million customers with "unlimited data" plans that can be subject to throttling, representing just under half of its smartphone users. It stopped signing up new customers for those plans in 2010, and warned last year that it would start slowing speeds for people who consume the most data.

What's surprising people like Trang is how little data use it takes to reach that level -- sometimes less than AT&T gives people on its "limited" plans.
Trang's iPhone was throttled just two weeks into his billing cycle, after he'd consumed 2.3 gigabytes of data. He pays $30 per month for "unlimited" data. Meanwhile, Dallas-based AT&T now sells a limited, or "tiered," plan that provides 3 gigabytes of data for the same price.

Users report that if they call the company to ask or complain about the throttling, AT&T customer support representatives suggest they switch to the limited plan.

"They're coaxing you toward the tiered plan," said Gregory Tallman in Hopatcong, N.J. He hasn't had his iPhone 4S throttled yet, but he's gotten text-messages from AT&T, warning that he's approaching the limit. This came after he had used just 1.5 gigabytes of data in that billing cycle.

John Cozen, a Web and mobile applications designer in San Diego, hasn't been throttled yet either, but he's been so disturbed by a warning that he's "almost scared to use the phone," he said. Complaining to AT&T got him nowhere, and now he's looking to switch to another carrier.

"I don't think two to three gigabytes is an exorbitant amount," he said. "Really, I'm just looking at pictures and text once in a while."

AT&T spokesman Mark Siegel said that as of last summer, the top 5 percent of data users were using 2 gigabytes of data per month. But he also said the company doesn't actually throttle all of the top 5 percent "unlimited" data users. Last month, the figure was only 0.5 percent, or about 200,000 people, he said.

That's because AT&T only throttles users in areas where the wireless network is congested that month, Siegel said.

Siegel also pointed out that aside from moving to a tiered plan, "unlimited" plan users on the cusp of being throttled can use one of AT&T's 30,000 Wi-Fi hotspots, where usage is unmetered.

The unlimited plan worked fine for AT&T a few years ago, when the iPhone was new. The company had ample capacity on its network, and wanted to lure customers with the peace of mind offered by unlimited plans. Now, a majority of AT&T subscribers on contract-based plans have smartphones, and the proportion is growing every month. That's putting a big load on AT&T's network.

The limited data plans force subscribers to keep an eye on their usage, so they don't overwhelm AT&T's network. Verizon Wireless has adopted similar plans. But the two companies differ in how they manage their remaining "unlimited" subscribers.

Verizon doesn't slow down the "5 percent" unless the cell tower their phone is connected to is congested at that moment, and it slows them down by the minimum amount necessary. By contrast, once AT&T has decided to throttle your phone, it will be slow for the rest of the billing cycle, even if it's 3 a.m. and there are no other cell phones competing for the capacity of that particular cell tower.

Verizon's measures have drawn few complaints, and indeed, may have gone unnoticed even by the "5 percent."

T-Mobile USA is up front about the level it starts throttling at: 5 gigabytes. AT&T subscribers have no idea if they might be among the top 5 percent until they get the warning, which is soon followed by throttled service. While Trang was throttled at 2.3 gigabytes, he knows other iPhone owners who are using 5 or 6 gigabytes per month with impunity.

"It seems very random," Trang said.

Sprint Nextel Corp. is hanging on to unlimited data plans without throttling, alone among the "Big Four" national wireless carriers.

Tallman sees few prospects for a lawsuit against AT&T. The company is still providing unlimited data usage to throttled customers, even if the speeds are so low as to make the phone useless for anything but phone calls and text messages. The company made no promises that "unlimited" data would always be coupled with high speeds, he notes.

"They just guaranteed the highway. They didn't guarantee the speed limit," he said.

 

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 11 of 11

starteck81 said on February 14, 2012 at 10:41 AM

@savvydude2003, Yes, I do think they wanted to buy them for their customers. I'm sure the infrastructure was important as well but I think it was more about the customers. Here's why: T-Mobile's parent company does not want to spend capitol to upgrade their infrastructure. Eventually their technology will fall out of date and they will not be able to compete with the other big 3. They will at that point start to bleed customers or need someone to buy them out. Enter AT&T with their buy out proposal. As part of that bid they said that they would put money into T-Mobile's infrastructure if the bid FAILED to pass the FCC. Why would you do that unless you had the attitude of 'if I can't have their customers then I'll make sure no one else gets them by keeping the rival company afloat'?

81362772
Flag this comment

savvydude2003 said on February 14, 2012 at 7:53 AM

Oops I mean buy T-Mobile...my bad

81353402
Flag this comment

savvydude2003 said on February 14, 2012 at 7:52 AM

starteck81 - Why do you think AT&T wanted to but T-mobile? For it's customer base? No because of their cell towers. AT&T was going to spend 39 billion mainly to buy more bandwidth because they are very committed to expanding their network coverage. Now it is going to cost them 4 billion for the deal to fall through. The main issue is two fold. Incredible governmental red tape in being able to build out new towers. Many city councils across the country forbid or reject the construction of new cell towers for many supposed reasons. Citizen activists protest the construction of new cell towers. Everyone complains about how their cell service sucks...but don't you dare put a cell tower up near my home. It is okay so long as you put it up in someone other neighborhood. Typical me me me mentality. Just google cell tower rejection and you will see what I am talking about. NO TO THE CRANFORD SWIM CLUB CELL TOWER, Stillwater Zoning Board unanimous in cell tower rejection- etc etc etc

81353317
Flag this comment

starteck81 said on February 13, 2012 at 11:33 PM

king5fan8817, You obviously know very little about the telecom industry. I am an IT professional that deals with them on a regular basis. They get obscene subsidies from the federal government, near industry monopolies, and still make tons of money. I promise you that they are nowhere near out of money. They have more than enough capitol to build out their networks but just don't want to unless their arms are twisted or the Fed pays for it.

81342777
Flag this comment

machinehead said on February 13, 2012 at 8:46 PM

The thing is VZ doesn't have any of their own towers near my house. There's an APP to look see. Most are T-Mobile or some other wireless carrier. I wound up having to buy a $250 "Network Extender" hooked to my Internet router to get 4 bars in my house in Lakewood. Before that it was 1 bar maybe with dropped calls all the time. And I live on a hill. Locked into a 2 year contract with a $175 early disconnect fee if I thought about going someplace else. Fixed income severely limits what changes I can make. It becomes a whack-a-mole scenario trying to get the best plan from these companies! You might as well be dealing with a bank!

81339172
Flag this comment

drxtreme said on February 13, 2012 at 6:50 PM

drxtreme avatar

Time to once again hang AT&T out like a dead dear in the wild just like we did years ago when they were deemed a MONOPOLY and busted up. Well this time its not MONOPOLY -- it's Accessibility and they are going after the the WRONG people this time...not the little guy...not the type who lets something go...This time its the Upper end of IT and business. The people who have the cash still to hire the BIG gun lawers to hammer their buns into the dirt! I am one...I am retired from that game and wont take it...be warned and be ready AT&T!!!

81335304
Flag this comment

Sir_Real said on February 13, 2012 at 5:56 PM

Way to go net neutrality..

81333228
Flag this comment

gritz said on February 13, 2012 at 3:27 PM

King5fan - When most people signed up for unlimited, it was before the Iphone took off. They are long standing customers who have paid the extra cost to get what they needed long before there was a demand. Now, AT&T has found a new way to earn more money. Have people pay for a certain amount then fine them heavily if they go over that amount. They try and get you to break your existing contract whenever you go for an upgrade and will cancel your contract if you try and get additional features. Now they are cutting back service to those that have the unlimited contracts to force then to renegociate on their terms. Seems to me, if you buy a product, you should expect that product to work as advertized. As for non-profit, you need to look at their quarterly profit margin.

81327374
Flag this comment

DCal2722 said on February 13, 2012 at 1:53 PM

To continue: AT&T is basically taking the position that "we can break the agreement by playing games with wording and finding a potential loophole, re: "The company made no promises that "unlimited" data would always be coupled with high speeds, he notes." By deliberately providing flawed or far less than the established norm their network has established they , AT&T, are not honoring an agreement entered in good faith. I would love to see AT&T's reponse to a customer attempting to alter a contract they entered in a similar manner. This very weekend I had been looking for a new iPhone 4S and service. AT&T was my primary choice thus far. After reading this article, SPRINT is my new provider.

81322654
Flag this comment

king5fan8817 said on February 13, 2012 at 12:55 PM

You gotta pay to play, folks. Can't think of one network, big or small, national or regional, that cosider themselves to be non-profit. Welcome to America.

81319659
Flag this comment

bfailing21667331 said on February 13, 2012 at 12:53 PM

break them upn again

81319554
Flag this comment