Print
Email
Share

KING 5 poll finds support for Eyman's anti-tax initiative

by KING 5 News

KING5.com

Posted on August 30, 2010 at 5:21 PM

SEATTLE - A new KING 5 News poll finds that by a 3-to-1 margin, Washington State voters would pass Tim Eyman's latest anti-tax initiative.

Initiative 1053 calls for re-establishing the two-thirds vote requirement for the Legislature to pass tax increases.

The exclusive KING 5 News poll conducted by SurveyUSA found that the measure would pass, 55 percent to 18 percent, with 26 percent of likely voters not certain how they will vote.

The poll found that voters are not as clear on three other statewide ballot measures.

Initiative 1098 would create a state income tax for individuals making over $200,000 and married couples making over $400,000. If the vote were held today, 41 percent of likely voters say they would be certain to vote yes and 33 percent are certain to vote no.

Initiative 1107 would roll back new state taxes on soda, bottled water, candy and some processed meat. It has 42 percent of likely voters saying they are certain to vote yes, 34 percent certain to vote no and 24 percent not certain.

Referendum 52 would authorize bonds and continue a sales tax on bottled water to pay for projects to increase energy efficiency in public schools. Thirty-four percent are certain to vote yes, 42 percent are certain to vote no and 24 percent are not certain how they will vote.

Click here for the complete interactive crosstabs.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 15 of 16

taxed said on September 7, 2010 at 8:25 PM

Taxes, taxes, taxes, taxes,was'nt there something about representation?

51449808
Flag this comment

anonymoususer said on September 5, 2010 at 12:05 PM

How is it "unconstitutional" ??? Voters previously stated 2/3 majority in which the legislature promptly voteed to overturn before the last session so they could ram the illegal food tax down our throats. Funny how the socialists were the ones who supported the 2/3 majority when they did not control of the legislature. After november, it won't matter anyway since the socialists will no longer have 2/3 majority. They will be lucky if they have 25%

51315704
Flag this comment

anonymoususer said on September 5, 2010 at 12:01 PM

As long as the state has the money to pay for the idiotic viaduct tunnel replacement (instead of rebuilding the viaduct like the taxpayers want) then they do not need any more taxes. Anyone who votes for the incvome tax "for the wealthy" are fools - it will be ruled unconstitutional and the buffoons in olympia will place it on ALL people in the state. If you think it will only stay "on the wealthy" (and likely your employer) then you are a brainless fool - the type of sucker olympia loves to dupe.

51315504
Flag this comment

tootoo said on August 31, 2010 at 10:36 AM

More taxes please. We need a better transportation system, schooling system and health system. You don't get those by slashing taxes left and right. Don't like taxes? I hear Somalia is nice this time of year and taxes are non-existent!

50974984
Flag this comment

scott_bellevue said on August 31, 2010 at 6:53 AM

We are taxed enough thank you. Eyman might be a jerk, but we need less taxes, not more. Enough already.

50956939
Flag this comment

yessir said on August 31, 2010 at 5:31 AM

If Eyman's name is associated with it... I won't support it. This "savior of taxpayer money" has cost the taxpayers of Washington millions of dollars, while lining his own.

50950894
Flag this comment

tootoo said on August 31, 2010 at 5:28 AM

Dear Tim Eyman, Nobody likes you. The people who voted yes were the same 20 neo-cons from Eastern Washington voting over and over. Please leave and go to Idaho and ruin their state instead. Thanks, Sane Washington State Voters

50950684
Flag this comment

jackwong said on August 31, 2010 at 3:16 AM

Amen, Stevezemke! Even if Eyman's initiative passes, we must pressure our gov't to take them to court to quash it. This is NOT the time to cut revenue, when we have teachers and state workers at risk of losing their jobs.

50944863
Flag this comment

stevezemke said on August 30, 2010 at 10:09 PM

Eyman's Initiative 1053 is unconstitutional. Funny how the right wing supports the constitution except when it is convenient for them to ignore it. Article II, Section 22 of the Washington State Constitution says that the Legislature shall approve legislation including revenue measures by a majority vote. It nowhere describes any other voting option. An initiative can not amend the state constitution. That requires a constitutional amendment. Support our state constitution and vote to uphold it. Vote No on 1053.

50937619
Flag this comment

freedomthinker said on August 30, 2010 at 9:23 PM

the only way to "fight how it is spent" (dakotanative) is to cut off the flow and make them spend what they have better. saying "no" to new taxes is exactly that

50936139
Flag this comment

dakotanative said on August 30, 2010 at 9:13 PM

Gotta love the anti-tax idiots. The roads will fix themselves, the cops will work for free, the schools will be self-sufficiant. When I had my taxes done at the blockhead lat year, the person doing my taxes said she could reccommend things that would take my future tax liability down to zero. When I asked her will pay for the roads, she said that the rich can do that. If you have a problem with how the money is spent, fight how it is spent. Shutting off money to the schools is not going to stop the teachers from their greed, it will cut programs that actually help the kids.

50935719
Flag this comment

kagiee said on August 30, 2010 at 9:05 PM

If the government spent our money resposibly, this wouldn't even be an issue. But I will probably be fined for using "ours" illegally and fined as in the other story today!

50935426
Flag this comment

javajoe said on August 30, 2010 at 9:03 PM

Finally people realize we're all taxed enough. Refreshing :)

50935308
Flag this comment

telman said on August 30, 2010 at 8:40 PM

The Evergreen Queen and her court jesters are not going to be very happy about this poll.

50934294
Flag this comment

rigidprinciples said on August 30, 2010 at 7:19 PM

One of the best things about Washington is they do not have an illegal income tax. We the People do not live in a democracy, and luckily, as democracy is nothing more than tyranny by many. Initiative 1098 is clearly unconstitutional, as it infringes on the individual, inherent rights of Americans. It doesn't matter if 100% of the People vote to infringe on our individual, inherent rights. If it infringes on our individual, inherent rights, it is repugnant to the Constitution, it is void, and it is not to be followed.

50930499
Flag this comment

blankingout said on August 30, 2010 at 6:41 PM

Not usually an Eyman fan, but I am voting for his Red light cam initiative.

50928473
Flag this comment