Print
Email
Share

Budget problems could cut public art in Washington buildings

by DREW MIKKELSEN / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @Drewmikk

KING5.com

Posted on March 28, 2011 at 6:00 PM

OLYMPIA, Wash. -- Add artists to the list of people who could be hit by Washington state's budget cuts.

Facing a deficit of more than $5 billion, Governor Chris Gregoire has proposed eliminating the State Arts Commission.

Senator Mike Carrell said it's time for the state to stop requiring one-half of one percent of a public building's cost be spent on artwork.

"What you do when times are good is one thing, but these are the worst of times," said Sen. Carrell, R-Lakewood.

Eliminating the public art requirement would save about $2 million.

Sen. Carrell said artists and public art should not be immune from the cuts being made to education, prisons, social and health services.

Olympia artist Tom Anderson said the state would suffer if lawmakers went after public art.

Pieces of his work are on display in public buildings and schools thanks to state and local laws supporting artists.

"Imagine a world without art," said Anderson, "Without any kind of visual stimuli, without creativity."

A spokesperson for Sen. Ed Murray, D-Seattle, the chair of the Senate Ways and Means committee, said the senator is "resisting" efforts to target artists in the senate's budget proposal.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 8 of 8

rnl52 said on March 31, 2011 at 6:48 PM

@invalid, I think it is a concern. like seatraveler said, the Soviet Union was full of artless concrete public buildings. I want to live in a nice place.

63865457
Flag this comment

lsmith5870400119 said on March 30, 2011 at 8:26 AM

You want to be an artist? Do it on your own. Don't expect me and everyone else to foot the bill for junk you perceive as art.

63729888
Flag this comment

invalid said on March 29, 2011 at 10:36 AM

I fail to see why this is a major concern. This won't become a world without art. This will be come a world where the taxpayers don't pay for it. There is no good reason why tax money should go to fund something so unnecessary.

63664127
Flag this comment

scott_bellevue said on March 29, 2011 at 8:31 AM

Why is it that government officials want to reduce some programs, but others, like art, are targeted to be entirely eliminated? I have an idea, let's eliminate our entire military budget. We'll keep the national guard, but we don't need the military AT ALL. Problem solved. We now have money for every bloated program we can conceive of.

63653063
Flag this comment

mr_conservative said on March 29, 2011 at 6:03 AM

Nobody is proposing eliminating art...just publicly funded art. Art should stand on its own merits without government support.

63641494
Flag this comment

seatraveler said on March 28, 2011 at 6:52 PM

Imagine it? No need to imagine - we've seen it. The whole Soviet era in Russia was full of artless concrete buildings, bus stations, train stations, and cities. So oppressive and lacking in visual imagery that it was frightening. Why isn't anyone calling out these people on their proposal to take to 1970s-style Soviet government "workers only" sensibilities?

63622262
Flag this comment

phather said on March 28, 2011 at 6:41 PM

At 58 seconds left in the video while interviewing Sen Mike Carrell(D)...is that a minigun on his wall?!

63621718
Flag this comment

javajoe said on March 28, 2011 at 6:27 PM

This one will keep me up all night for sure ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

63620882
Flag this comment