Print
Email
Share

Judges asked to reinstate breathalyzer tests in DUI cases

by KYLE MOORE / KING 5 News

KING5.com

Posted on August 2, 2010 at 4:24 PM

Updated Monday, Aug 2 at 6:14 PM

KENT, Wash. – A driver accused of killing two Federal Way teens got out of a previous DUI charge when breathalyzer tests were tossed out of court. Now, prosecutors want those tests back to keep more drunk drivers from getting behind the wheel.

In 2008, breathalyzer results were thrown out when it was discovered the state's crime lab machines weren't calibrated correctly and there was sloppy oversight. Since then, thousands of cases every year have been affected. Currently, state troopers can give you a breath test if they suspect you are drunk, but the results can't be used in court.

Now, prosecutors say the lab has changed leadership and improved quality control.

"We don't think the issues that caused suppression in 2008, two years ago, still exists at the toxicology lab," said Maggie Nave, King County Deputy Prosecuting Attorney.

Prosecutors argued before a three-judge panel Monday that breath tests should be reinstated. They are using nine cases to challenge that ruling which, they say, handcuffs them.

"Obviously we like to have the breath test in a case. It's is a very good and strong piece of evidence," said Nave.

In June, prosecutors say Alexander Peder rear-ended a car on Interstate 5 at Southcenter, killing 18-year-olds Derek King and Nick Hodgins.

"He killed my son Nicholas," Mary Bobbitt says of the suspected drunk driver who is charged with killing her son Nicholas Hodgins along I-5 in Tukwila in June.

The death came just a few days before Nicholas's graduation from Decatur High School in Federal Way.

It turns out, the suspected drunk driver, Alexander Peder, had been arrested for drunk driving two times before. In a 2007 case, a judge threw out Peder's breath test so prosecutors accepted a lower plea for reckless endangerment.

Bobbitt wonders if her son would be alive today if Peder would have been convicted of the more serious charge.

"If Mr. Peder had been convicted of a DUI, he would not have been out drinking and driving and killing our son." 

The judges could issue a ruling as early as next week. Regardless, Bobbitt has a message for those thinking about drinking and driving.

"You may think the worst thing that can happen to you is that you get arrested for a DUI, but you could kill someone. Just don't do it," she said.
 

Print
Email
Share

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 13 of 13

pnwnative56 said on August 3, 2010 at 1:22 PM

For the justice system to change in this country you will have to get rid of all the goody goody bleeding hearts who believe everybody in this fair land has good in their hearts and made an honest mistake. Like mitch22 says we need some serious rough justice. You kill someone- no appeals or drawn out trials, kill em now. Get caught stealing or armed robbery, cut your hands off. Rape or molest someone, instant castration. That will give these scumbag criminals something to think about. It just might be the deterrent we need in this toilet bowl justice system

49096184
Flag this comment

mitch22 said on August 3, 2010 at 12:59 AM

The justice system is incredibly idiotic... I watch law shows all the time, and it's really unfortunate that a lot of the TV dramas are pretty spot on... If we had rough justice like in some countries, people wouldn't commit crime...

49048682
Flag this comment

wina1960 said on August 2, 2010 at 10:43 PM

Mr. Peder would have been in and out of jail in such a short period of time that there is absolutely no garuntee that he wouldn't kill someone. Going to jail does not stop anyone from drunk driving. For many drunk drivers killing someone isn't even incentive enough. There are many factors that cause false readings of a breathealyzers. These factors are not even taken into consideration. I have seen officers (and prosecutors) let falling down drunks (and one who doesn't remember anything of the night she got stopped) go and taking others who had a medical condition that made them appear to be drunk into the station. The officers were not fully truthful about the circumstances in both types of cases (or confused the facts with other traffic stops).

49046728
Flag this comment

clear2copy said on August 2, 2010 at 9:47 PM

Some states require troopers to be phlebotomists.. taking a sample of blood on the scene.. no breath test..none of the stalling delays that suspects use to try and let their BAC come down.. boom.. done.. blood is in evidence that reflects the BAC at the time of the incident..sadly Washington likes to coddle our pathetic drunks..so reasonable procedures like this would never be implemented.

49045578
Flag this comment

lksproodle said on August 2, 2010 at 9:20 PM

If alcohol is involved in any death-- done deal your finished- no plea bargains.If it's an accident car is gone till rehab is over no questions asked-drinking and driving is against the law- period- no excuses.This phony bull is exactly that!

49044984
Flag this comment

collegeguy said on August 2, 2010 at 8:28 PM

straightshooter, unfortunately that is how our justice system is designed to work. Despite the best and most conclusive evidence, if you put easily swayed people on a jury, you get bad decisions. I sat on a bleeding heart jury in a civil case once and the amount of money they gave to the plaintif disgusted me. Most of the jurors believed the hired gun chiropractor who said the accident was clearly the reason for the increased degeneration in the guys back, despite the guy having been an avid snowboarder and very active lifestyle that could also have been the reason he had his back problems. The only thing proven was that he had been hit by the other person but did not go see a doctor for over a month after the accident and had been working and playing so that no actual reasonable timeline could be established to say it was because of the accident.

49043577
Flag this comment

brewster said on August 2, 2010 at 8:22 PM

There is a reason why US got more lawyers than any other country in the world. The system is made so those blood suckers can get rich without caring about justice. If those creeps can get a DUI driver off the hook and make a few bucks, they are all for it. For the same reason a criminal is better protected and have more rights than the victims.

49043379
Flag this comment

gracer said on August 2, 2010 at 7:22 PM

freedom, They just won an international accreditation for their new procedures and overhaul. I think that more than qualifies as it's an outside oversight or "independent confirmation" of the lab as a whole. King5 may still have the story in its archives. :)

49040894
Flag this comment

freedomthinker said on August 2, 2010 at 6:37 PM

i find it interesting that the only people saying the "crime lab is A-Okay" so far are state prosecutors, bureaucrats, police and the like. lets get a smidge of independent confirmation before we give the lab its stripes back. any part of the system can fall prey to politicizing, incompetence, and just plain laziness. it is up to us to make them prove they speak for us.

49038339
Flag this comment

straighshooter said on August 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM

well first of all, there are machines out there that determine a person's alcohol level, but unfortunately, you have attorneys, who instead of for right and wrong, get their clients off by challenging the system and finding sympathy. there is no longer truth and justice any more, but what the all mighty dollar can do for you. regardless of what happens, and the crime goes to court, the jurors need to take a stand and look through the smoke and see what is actually at stake. also, the judges need to take a stand and put their feet down and dont let the attorneys run the court room. i often see jurors fall into the make belief world of the attorney where the officers lied or deceived in order to make an arrest. i have heard jurors say that a person who was arrested for drunk driving was a good person and believe he was a caring person and decided to let him go free. unitl the driver gets into an accident and kills someone. so who is to blame?

49038084
Flag this comment

dorimonsonfan said on August 2, 2010 at 6:00 PM

seriously we can clone fluffy the dog and make a vaccine for measels and chicken pox but we can`t develop a machine to determine how much alcohol is in someone`s breath? o well at least randy dorn is in charge of our bright young pupils and scientists of the future, they`ll get it figured out.

49036509
Flag this comment

diamonddon said on August 2, 2010 at 5:20 PM

I can understand if things were done in a sloppy manner, but if they have gotten all their ducks in a row there is no reason to not to reinstate the breathalyzers. Law enforcement needs all the "legal" tools possible to deter the drunks from driving. Now if the judges would only get tough with the DUI's and make it to expensive to drink and drive, start doing some heavy monetary fines and some non-suspendable jail time and each offense's cost double the previous one. Example 1st. 90 Days. 2nd. 180 Days, 3rd. 360 days, and also treat fines the same way. If there is a fatality involved, a min. of 10 years.

49034522
Flag this comment

yogibear said on August 2, 2010 at 4:34 PM

I am angry that DUI drivers get 2nd chances. Their victims don't. Taking their license does nothing. They continue to drive.

49032374
Flag this comment

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?

Register Now

Member Benefits

Link your account to your Twitter or Facebook account for easier login!

Link your account to your Facebook profile Link your account to your Twitter profile

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

* - Indicates required field

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

Connecting to

You may need to allow pop up window for this step of registration

Just one more step:

Please take a moment to review the available e-mail newsletters has to offer. Place a checkbox next to the newsletters you wish to subscribe to.

Welcome.

Thank you for becoming a member of KING5.com. You now have full access to the best local coverage and late breaking news from KING5.com. Soon you will be redirected to the page you were seeking, and a confirmation email will be delivered to you.

You will need to respond to the confirmation e-mail for your account to be activated.

KING5.com is dedicated to bringing you exceptional news and outstanding information services, all while personalizing it to your liking. We're sure you'll enjoy being a KING5.com member! If you need assistance, please contact us.