Print
Email
Share

Bellevue council suggests Sound Transit take homes for Light Rail

by CHRIS DANIELS / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @ChrisDaniels5

KING5.com

Posted on October 25, 2011 at 4:40 AM

Updated Tuesday, Oct 25 at 7:21 AM

BELLEVUE – Bellevue’s City Council postponed a vote Monday night, which would have allowed Sound Transit to take the next step in building the East Link and made a suprise move that could affect some 50 homeowners.
 
The Council failed to reach internal agreement on the Memorandum of Understanding with the agency, which included financial particulars and burdens on the transit tunnel through downtown. Several council members suggested they needed more time to read the document, and understand the ramifications.
 
During the same study session, the council also voted 6-1 to suggest Sound Transit use eminent domain and do a “total take” of roughly 50 homes along 112th Avenue in the Surrey Downs subdivision. Council members suggested it would be better than a “partial take” for homeowners like Susan Ilvanakis.
 
“I feel like we have the Scarlet Letter,” said Ilvanakis.  Her home borders 112th.  She’s felt in limbo as city leaders have negotiated the next steps.

“I don’t want to say you’re sacrificing the neighborhood for the tunnel, but that’s how a lot of us feel,” she said.
 
She vowed to keep fighting after the vote Monday.
 
A Sound Transit spokesperson had no comment on the vote, or the MOU delay. The agency’s board is meeting Thursday and had hoped to advance the project to the final planning stages.
 
Bellevue’s City Council also voted Monday to have a public hearing November 7 on the Memorandum of Understanding, and a vote on the document November 14.
 

Print
Email
Share

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 11 of 11

mcrain092 said on October 27, 2011 at 11:55 AM

My grandparents home is in surrey downs that borders the condos on 112th. If they are planning on taking all those homes on that street I hope they're fair with the value given the state of the economy.... There home was worth 850k back in 2006 but is probably only "worth" 500k today even though its 5 beds three baths. My family will be happy to sell since theyd rather downsize at this point in there lives anyways, but only for a fair offer since they've been there for 30 years. It's sad though because they don't want to live there with light rail anyways. Takes the value of the house down with the noise and no one wants there view to be that.. plus so many ppl just being around could be asking for higher crime rates too. Sad that eminent domain isn't reversible as someone else's mentioned...

75960399
Flag this comment

wethreesing46981 said on October 25, 2011 at 9:34 PM

Why can they not find a way to use the rail line that is already in place?

75872247
Flag this comment

erwhitey said on October 25, 2011 at 7:19 PM

the surry downs neighborhood is an old area of bellevue. it is surrounded by the freeway, big buildings, and the mall is nearby. the neighbors who are not bought out could go in together and build light commercial and condos and make some money and revitalize the area. no matter what light rail is coming

75868736
Flag this comment

coyotebmw said on October 25, 2011 at 3:23 PM

The concept of eminent domain is one of the most abused government practices in our modern world. Considering the in-fighting that has been going on in the City of Bellevue, between two developers over the light rail (See this past Sunday's Seattle Times). I think the City of Bellevue really needs to step back and reconsider what they are doing.

75858828
Flag this comment

Jake-518 said on October 25, 2011 at 2:14 PM

Hopefully the government of Bellevue actually gives full and fair compensation to these homeowners.

75856019
Flag this comment

ponderer said on October 25, 2011 at 2:13 PM

I'm having a hard time feeling too sorry for the owners of the properties that may be bought out by eminent domain; this happens a great deal of the time, you just don't hear about it since the people that are affected usually don't have the whine capacity that people in King County have. My parents had a friend that owned a peach orchard in Yakima County; when Interstate 82 was put through it took out a considerable amount of his orchard...with what he received from the property settlement he decided to retire. He really didn't want to retire but knew that the freeway was going to go through. Frankly, nobody promises anybody that they will never be affected by changes in the area they live (I'm none too happy about how Microsoft has taken over the Overlake area since I moved here, back when it was just five building way back in a forested, wetland area). There is always the possibility that changes/improvements will affect a land owner at anytime.

75855952
Flag this comment

sludgepuppy said on October 25, 2011 at 1:34 PM

Before any land is taken from anyone. The government should open the transportation market to competition. With half a dozen of more service providers there might not be a need for light rail, a tunnel or anything else, or at least contract out the operation of the transit system as is done in other cities around the world.

75854159
Flag this comment

noskills said on October 25, 2011 at 8:48 AM

eminent domain is not new. Its been used for a very very long time. There are suppose to be certain requirements that need to be met to allow the government to use it but sometimes they use questionable logic to justify it. The bad thing is that those homes have most likely taken a hit so they wont get as much for the home as they could have.

75836694
Flag this comment

tugthug said on October 25, 2011 at 7:48 AM

There should be a reverse eminent domain rule were we can take the Goverment's land!

75832814
Flag this comment

bazwest said on October 25, 2011 at 7:40 AM

It is a slippery slope when government views all property as it's own especially private property. Levying hefty property taxes to finance rampant spending is one thing, using eminent domain rules to take private property is a further escalation of government intrusion. They will tell you "it is for the good of all." Is it really?

75832294
Flag this comment

scott_bellevue said on October 25, 2011 at 6:33 AM

We need light rail. We need public transportation.

75828494
Flag this comment