Print
Email
Share

No free lunch for Wash legislators discussing pot laws

No free lunch for Wash legislators discussing pot laws

Credit: KING

Washington State Capitol

by Associated Press

KING5.com

Posted on February 6, 2010 at 2:51 PM

Updated Saturday, Feb 6 at 4:25 PM

OLYMPIA, Wash. - Seven legislators and an aide have been told to pay back up to $18 each for box lunches they ate at a discussion of marijuana laws.

The Legislative Ethics Board threw out a complaint against state Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles and others who invited travel writer Rick Steves to the Capitol in October to talk about several topics, including marijuana. But legislative administrative leaders said the lawmakers who ate the free lunches should pay the state the value of the food because it could be considered part of the $90 a day spending allowance they receive.

Steves, who supports decriminalizing marijuana possession, says travel can help people learn about how other cultures address social problems, which in turn can help Americans create better public policies on health care, drug laws and other issues. The lunches were provided by the American Civil Liberties Union, which also wants pot decriminalized.

Activist Rob Kavanaugh of Lacey filed the complaint with the board, saying about $50 of public money was spent on posters publicizing the talk and that Steves gave out copies of a travel book he wrote. The board dismissed that complaint, ruling that the free books cost less than a $50 exemption in the state's ethics law. It did not rule on the lunch issue.

The Olympian newspaper reported that House and Senate administrative leaders said they took the unusual step of demanding the lunch money because Kavanaugh had complained so vigorously.

It amounts to $18 each for two senators and a Senate staffer and $9.50 each for five representatives. House counsel Tim Sekerak said the House conducted a lengthy and formal investigation of the cost of the box lunch, which included a sandwich, drink and cookie, before deciding on the lower charge.

Sen. Mary Margaret Haugen, one of her aides, and Sen. Jim Kastama, D-Puyallup, paid the $18. House members who got nicked are Democrats Ruth Kagi of Lake Forest Park, Mary Helen Roberts of Edmonds, Deborah Eddy of Kirkland, Mary Lou Dickerson of Seattle and Kevin Van De Wege of Sequim.

"I think the whole thing has gotten blown out of proportion," Kohl-Welles, D-Seattle, told The Olympian newspaper on Friday. She said senators and staff had checked with legal advisers about ethics-law implications beforehand.

"We got permission to do this. There are lunches provided all the time on campus, almost daily, and it has never come up as far as I know," she said.

"It's not an ethics issue with the ethics law. It's a matter of them being reimbursed for something they're not entitled to," Secretary of the Senate Tom Hoemann said last month of the then-pending reimbursements.

Haugen said it's important to have citizens watching to be sure lawmakers toe the ethical line.

"I never mind paying my own way," she said. "Just send us the bill."

Kavanaugh said Friday that he will appeal the board's decision because it did not address the lunch issue.

Last week, the Senate passed a measure that would allow people with debilitating or terminal illnesses to more easily obtain medical marijuana. The bill now goes to the House.

Print
Email
Share

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 15 of 17

ringer said on February 12, 2010 at 6:49 AM

It is understood that while marijuana has been essentially illegal since 1937, the prohibition of this plant has not worked. There have been studies done that prove it has medical uses, if it didn't then the synthetic drug Marinol would not exist. It has also been proven that in recreational use it does less harm than alcohol. Please look at how much our government spends on trying to fight something that is of no threat to our society. Realize how many other ways that money could be spent to make this a stronger country. Also, look into how much more money the country would make through taxation, as it does with alcohol and tobacco. Don't be afraid to stand up and say this to your fellow politicians. We, your constituents, are asking you to do this for us and for our country.

37486751
Flag this comment

rustydog said on February 8, 2010 at 2:58 PM

This is a smoking mirrows program that will allow pot users to get pot for mythical disabilities. There are lots of existing drugs they can take. Those that vote for this should be investigated for their own use of pot.

37242367
Flag this comment

inforelife said on February 8, 2010 at 10:35 AM

WOW DUDE, SLOWLY STEP AWAY FROM THE BONG AND DON'T MAKE ANY SUDDEN MOVES (Like you could)

37223712
Flag this comment

boynsini said on February 7, 2010 at 2:23 AM

Certain strains of marijuana has solved my sleeplessness, anxiety, and restlessness ten fold. I will not resort to commit myself to clinical depression and a lifetime of pill-popping and emotion suppression to benefit the restriction of legalized marijuana especially when proven by a physician. Those that argue this article and don't fully comprehend the benefits fully entailed by specific strands of thc, need to re-evaluate and re-assess this argument. $90 dollar a day allotment really isn't squat compared with the spending of the federal govt. with their misc. warmongering and arms expenses.... this is Washington state, a democratic, green state.... you will argue marijuana when it proves to be more positive when we have more important and pertinent issues at state. WAKE UP!

37154707
Flag this comment

boynsini said on February 7, 2010 at 2:17 AM

this is complete BS! I have been a tax payer and loyal subject of this determining hierarchy of a government all my life. $90 dollar expendature may be a easy way off, but it also demeans the greater issue at hand. Marijuana has been proven medically and through my own consumption has solved various medical and physiological issues I've had with my health that the prescription drug industry can't..... not to mention the controversy related to republican and right wing controls and checks in place to maintain political threshold and financial power to those that do nothing to the country and to the drug war they are supposedly waging. These issues all correlate to marijuana, cocain, crack.... all big and small money drugs that can be mediated by taking them off the illegal and placed more sufficiently to a controlled substance (more specifically Marijuana... the chemical drugs such as cocain, crack, pcp, meth, and others should remain as they are defined).

37154644
Flag this comment

impoorbutsexxxy said on February 7, 2010 at 12:05 AM

an $18 box lunch better come with 10 minutes in the closet with the cutest paige!

37153364
Flag this comment

yogibear said on February 6, 2010 at 9:30 PM

Don't be eating on my dime,

37150854
Flag this comment

quackula said on February 6, 2010 at 8:59 PM

Ya because that $18 box lunch will definitely put the state over the edge!

37150179
Flag this comment

dsgffwe said on February 6, 2010 at 7:18 PM

-------------------------- http:[[//www.uspopularbiz[].com -------------------------- http:[[//www.uspopularbiz[].com Christan Audigier bikini $25 Ed Hardy Bikini $25 Smful short_t-shirt_woman $15 ed hardy short_tank_woman $16 Sandal $32 christian louboutin $39 Sunglass $16 COACH_Necklace $27 handbag $36 AF tank woman $17 POLO new t-shirt man $16 ed hardy short t-shirt $17 POLO short $35 Ed Hardy board short man $33 jordan men $34 Sunglass $16 ed hardy cap $18 -------------------------- http:[[//www.uspopularbiz[].com -------------------------- http:[[//www.uspopularbiz[].com -------------------------- http:[[//www.uspopularbiz[].com -------------------------- http:[[//www.uspopularbiz[].com -------------------------- http:[[//www.uspopularbiz[].com -------------------------- http:[[//www.uspopularbiz[].com

37146814
Flag this comment

dsgffwe said on February 6, 2010 at 7:17 PM

-------------------------- http:[[//www.uspopularbiz[].com -------------------------- http:[[//www.uspopularbiz[].com Christan Audigier bikini $25 Ed Hardy Bikini $25 Smful short_t-shirt_woman $15 ed hardy short_tank_woman $16 Sandal $32 christian louboutin $39 Sunglass $16 COACH_Necklace $27 handbag $36 AF tank woman $17 POLO new t-shirt man $16 ed hardy short t-shirt $17 POLO short $35 Ed Hardy board short man $33 jordan men $34 Sunglass $16 ed hardy cap $18 -------------------------- http:[[//www.uspopularbiz[].com -------------------------- http:[[//www.uspopularbiz[].com -------------------------- http:[[//www.uspopularbiz[].com -------------------------- http:[[//www.uspopularbiz[].com -------------------------- http:[[//www.uspopularbiz[].com -------------------------- http:[[//www.uspopularbiz[].com

37146752
Flag this comment

bazwest said on February 6, 2010 at 6:25 PM

Lets see there are roughly 66,000 state employees. If they each received $90 that would be $5,940,000 per day, $29,700,000 per week and $1,544,400,000 per year. That would at least partially explain the budget problem in our state. Of course it is probably just the elected officials in the state that get the $90 per day (479 of them). That is $43,110 per day, $215,550 per week, and $11,208,600 per year. Yes it does add up pretty quickly. That would be $23,400 per year each on top of their $42,106 salaries.

37144989
Flag this comment

elgatomalo said on February 6, 2010 at 4:41 PM

Hey, that will help pay off the $2,600,000,000 deficit. Keep up the good work boys and girls.

37141824
Flag this comment

rogerracer said on February 6, 2010 at 4:34 PM

Can't blame them, they got the munchies!

37141567
Flag this comment

skippypotpiebaby said on February 6, 2010 at 4:07 PM

Only 90.00 What? 18.00 K? pay up GOT OFF LITE!!!!

37140519
Flag this comment

bluemax2001 said on February 6, 2010 at 3:52 PM

And how much taxpayer dollars were spent on this investigation?

37140049
Flag this comment

farmer01 said on February 6, 2010 at 3:50 PM

who really cares

37140022
Flag this comment

lardog118 said on February 6, 2010 at 3:08 PM

Now wait a minute. $90.00 Dollar a day spending allowance? WHAT? Holy waste of taxpayer money batman.

37138602
Flag this comment

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?

Register Now

Member Benefits

Link your account to your Twitter or Facebook account for easier login!

Link your account to your Facebook profile Link your account to your Twitter profile

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

* - Indicates required field

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

Connecting to

You may need to allow pop up window for this step of registration

Just one more step:

Please take a moment to review the available e-mail newsletters has to offer. Place a checkbox next to the newsletters you wish to subscribe to.

Welcome.

Thank you for becoming a member of KING5.com. You now have full access to the best local coverage and late breaking news from KING5.com. Soon you will be redirected to the page you were seeking, and a confirmation email will be delivered to you.

You will need to respond to the confirmation e-mail for your account to be activated.

KING5.com is dedicated to bringing you exceptional news and outstanding information services, all while personalizing it to your liking. We're sure you'll enjoy being a KING5.com member! If you need assistance, please contact us.