Print
Email
Share

Officers' families 'disappointed' by final death benefits bill

by DREW MIKKELSEN / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @Drewmikk

KING5.com

Posted on March 9, 2010 at 12:57 PM

Updated Tuesday, Mar 9 at 5:28 PM

OLYMPIA, Wash. - House members passed a bill to enhance the death benefits for relatives of police officers killed in the line of duty.

The measure passed the House 92-2 Tuesday. It removes a 10-year service requirement for officers to qualify for the benefits, and expands the lump sum given to families to $214,000. It also requires the state's universities to provide free tuition for families. They would also receive at least 10 percent of the officer's salary yearly.

Some surviving family members said they were disappointed the bill did not go far enough.

The final version left out a provision that would have let surviving spouses continue to receive death benefits after they remarry. Current law terminates benefits if a spouse remarries.

That element was amended out of the bill when the Senate approved it.

Several House members said they were upset to lose that element, but voted in favor of the bill so the other enhancements would become law.

"To have that taken out, it was really tough," said Renee Maher, who's husband's Patrick Maher was killed while working as a Federal Way police officer in 2003.

Maher was present for the vote.

Gov. Chris Gregoire encouraged lawmakers to pass the bill without the remarriage clause, to make sure some benefit reforms passed this session.

She said she hopes that element will be part of another bill next year.

"It can survive another day for another fight," she said.

 

Print
Email
Share

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 15 of 17

taxdollarsponge said on March 10, 2010 at 8:19 PM

Yessir,the world is coming to an end.

39036426
Flag this comment

tomma206 said on March 10, 2010 at 8:04 PM

Garbage about more greedy people

39035887
Flag this comment

yessir said on March 10, 2010 at 9:13 AM

You know... these officers place themselves in hazardous positions to protect you the public. Bobknows contention that there are more hazardous professions is a worn, libertarian smoke screen. These police officers aren't catching fish, or holding road signs, or trying to turn a profit for wall street. They are responding into situations that are sometimes extremely hazardous, to protect citizens like you... and trying to compare their death rates to other careers in the face of this reality is pretty ludicrous. Smug comments like "they chose this job and the knew it was dangerous" to justify cold hearted attitudes are intentionally callous. . I don't know if the benefits should have been as extensive as proposed... probably not... but these officers sure don't deserve some of the ludicrous comments posted here. What's the world coming to when people become this hardened and cold?

38996868
Flag this comment

dede1978 said on March 10, 2010 at 7:51 AM

1beachperson, I didn't say they don't deserve anything, but continuing to receive benefits after they remarry is going too far in my book. As some have stated, military surviving spouses don't get that much. And as for the expense of raising children, the biggest expense is that college education, which will continue to be covered. Also as mentioned, they should get insurance policies due to the type of work they do. I support law enforcement, but to continue supporting their families....

38990801
Flag this comment

aceswild said on March 10, 2010 at 6:11 AM

Spouses of US soldiers do not continue to recieve benifits if they remarry, why should it be different for spouses of police? And while 10% of their yearly salary seems low, they are lucky to get even that. Most families dont even get that. And no matter what monitary, educational, or health benifits they recieve, it still wont bring their spouse back. Its sad and I really do feel for families who lose loved ones but shouldnt you be grateful for what you do get?

38983588
Flag this comment

browndog said on March 10, 2010 at 5:54 AM

That is more than enough. My father died at work when I was eleven years old leaving my mom with two childeren and got nothing. She still found a way to keep our home, and help us through school.

38982496
Flag this comment

javajoe said on March 9, 2010 at 10:19 PM

The Bill rightly removed the benefits in the event of remarriage. I can't imagine any spouse who would want their benefits used to support someone who has taken their place after they’ve died. This is otherwise a good Bill and these families deserve every bit of it.

38972543
Flag this comment

beetle73 said on March 9, 2010 at 10:18 PM

wow i wish my wife could continue to get the benifiets if i die and she remarries. I don't see why they should, they don't do that for the military wives.

38972526
Flag this comment

gritz said on March 9, 2010 at 8:02 PM

I think the 10 year service requirement should be abolished. No problem with the insurance payout, they pay for it. The 10% for spouses for life is a little excessive. What is the criteria for free schooling? Is this automatic? I mean do they have to score a certain SAT? Maintain a grade point? Any Washington State school? Does the State offer educational benefits for children of resident soldiers who die in the line of duty?

38968021
Flag this comment

bobknows said on March 9, 2010 at 7:02 PM

These swine are already far more overpaid than 99% of the hard working men of Washington. Their job is, on average, much less dangerous than many other government and private jobs such as street maintenance or garbage collection. Nothing seems to be too good for Haywire's Gestapo. Her war on men has to be stopped.

38965366
Flag this comment

kismet1947 said on March 9, 2010 at 6:17 PM

This article is confusing to me. Does the spouse get the lump sum at the time of death and only 10% of the officers salary until they remarry or die? I thought the spouse would get a figure closer to 60% of officers salary until they remarried or died. 10% seems way too low to me unless there is a choice between the lump sum and one without the lump sum but higher percentage of the officer's salary. Like I said, the article is confusing and incomplete. I do agree that if you remarry you should loose the money.

38963359
Flag this comment

shoreline said on March 9, 2010 at 4:52 PM

Maybe it would make better sense to just offer every Police Officer, Firefighter and Flagger for that matter with a blanket life insurance policy like they should buy for themselves in the first place with a high risk job. I'm a Frefighter and while I'm happy the State has this benefit, I carry my own life insurance to protect my family and would never want to depend on the State or the taxpayers to take care of my family if the worst happens. That's MY responsibility.

38959691
Flag this comment

1beachperson said on March 9, 2010 at 3:40 PM

I think the children of Law Enforcement officers should continue to get benefits, even if their parent remarries. There are huge expenses to raising children, and having one income gone forever, particularly when killed by a nut case, helps the families get one their feet to keep on going. Free tuition? Sure, why not? I know a lot of other jobs can be high risk, but most don't go out everyday wondering if some idiot with a weapon is going to hunt them down and kill them! I'm not a bleeding heart liberal, but I think we need to support our law enforcement and fire fighters, and their families when they lose someone to another's deliberate act.

38956081
Flag this comment

jppatches said on March 9, 2010 at 2:59 PM

Sounds like a good deal. they should be happy

38953949
Flag this comment

dede1978 said on March 9, 2010 at 2:26 PM

I have complete sympathy for those who lose loved ones in such a fashion. But why should a spouse continue to receive benefits if they remarry? I think the concept is the loss of income and if they remarry, then that should no longer be an issue. Come on, they already get a nice lumpsum payment and college tuition for surviving children. Isn't that enough?

38952062
Flag this comment

newlogin86 said on March 9, 2010 at 2:22 PM

Wait, I know this is hard, but come on... free tuition for all the kids an officer has? 10% pay? They chose this high risk line of work. Working on a state highway project as a flagger is high risk and deaths are probably as high as officers killed in the line of duty. Do their families get $214k payouts, free tuition for all and 10% of their pay for well how long? (article didnt state that). The kids and spouse already will get SSI survivor benefits as well will they not? I am betting all other people who have government employee family members do not see this level of compensation. And most likely they have an insurance policy for that family member in a high risk occupation as well.

38951838
Flag this comment

jamey said on March 9, 2010 at 2:20 PM

Don't most good providers want to make sure our loved ones left behind are taken care of? This bill sounds like a pretty plush deal to me. My company provides its employees with $50k of death benefits. Any more than that, and we have to "buy it up". I come from a law enforcement family and I always would have rather had my dad than the benefits.

38951712
Flag this comment

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?

Register Now

Member Benefits

Link your account to your Twitter or Facebook account for easier login!

Link your account to your Facebook profile Link your account to your Twitter profile

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

* - Indicates required field

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

Connecting to

You may need to allow pop up window for this step of registration

Just one more step:

Please take a moment to review the available e-mail newsletters has to offer. Place a checkbox next to the newsletters you wish to subscribe to.

Welcome.

Thank you for becoming a member of KING5.com. You now have full access to the best local coverage and late breaking news from KING5.com. Soon you will be redirected to the page you were seeking, and a confirmation email will be delivered to you.

You will need to respond to the confirmation e-mail for your account to be activated.

KING5.com is dedicated to bringing you exceptional news and outstanding information services, all while personalizing it to your liking. We're sure you'll enjoy being a KING5.com member! If you need assistance, please contact us.