Print
Email
Share

State law would prevent restraining inmates during birth

by DREW MIKKELSEN / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @Drewmikk

KING5.com

Posted on January 15, 2010 at 8:02 PM

Updated Friday, Jan 15 at 8:02 PM

TACOMA, Wash. - Kimberly Mays has given birth to ten children, but she said none of the deliveries was as traumatic as the birth of her son Kenny in 2000.

"It was like a horror movie to me," Mays told KING 5.

The Tacoma woman was serving a 13-month sentence at the time at the Washington Corrections Center for Women in Gig Harbor.

When she began going into labor and had to be transported to St. Joseph's Hospital in Tacoma, she said she was put in leg and wrist restraints.

Mays said she was handcuffed while riding in the ambulance and when she was in active labor she said she was "shackled" to the hospital bed.

"I felt like an animal who was giving birth in front of her masters," said Mays.

The Department of Corrections won't comment on former inmates' complaints.

The Superintendent at the Corrections Center for Women said pregnant inmates are not restrained during the final moments of labor.

Superintendent Douglas Cole said only about 30 percent of pregnant offenders are restrained while they're at the hospital.

On those occasions, said Cole, the women are attached to the hospital bed with a 3-foot-long handcuff.

"The only type of circumstance where a pregnant active labor offender would be in leg restraints would be if she was creating a risk for herself or others," said Superintendent Douglas Cole.

On average, 30 inmates a year from the Gig Harbor facility give birth. It is the only state prison that houses pregnant inmates.

Two pieces of state legislation, one in the house and one in the senate, could prevent law enforcement agencies and corrections officers from using any kind of restraints on pregnant inmates at every level in the state.

The DOC is not taking a stance on the legislation, but Superintendent Cole said his officers will carry out whatever state laws are approved.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 15 of 27

pamby said on January 20, 2010 at 3:31 PM

I was handcuffed at the wrists to the bed when I gave birth to my son 32 years ago. At the time it was standard operating procedure. Something to do with not hurting the baby.. I'm not sure. The nurse I asked said I wasn't supposed to reach out for/grab at the baby because it might get dropped. I didn't even know I was handcuffed until I tried to raise my hands to my face to wipe away sweat after a contraction. (Lots of demerol prior) If I remember correctly it was chains with plastic tubing over it. Not handcuffs but the same effects. I couldn't raise my hands above my body. A three foot chain sounds like a luxury compared to it.

36019122
Flag this comment

obnurse1 said on January 17, 2010 at 10:46 PM

Aziza & planetbjr: Obviously you have no knowledge of what being a L&D RN entails. The prison inmates that are seen are NOT always "in hard labor" they are often found to be faking symptoms to get a "pass" to come to the hospital for what amounts to a field trip. Also, the motivation to escape is one hell of an incentive when you are facing 25 years to life. Women can do amazing things while in labor when they are motivated to do so. I am far from a "knuckle dragger" and I do this for a living because I care about humanity. The risk to all others on the unit is too great to worry about the rights of a criminal to feel good about her experience. The scenario that I see as a distinct possibility is this: An inmate esapes from her labor room, goes to the room next door, grabs the newborn from their crib and holds the newborn hostage while trying to escape. The firt time this happens...they will rethink the law.

35827774
Flag this comment

deniseh1006 said on January 17, 2010 at 7:32 PM

planetbjr: Sorry, but the rest of us that don't want our kids to be born in jail OBEY THE LAW. You break the law you deserve to be treated like an animal. I don't care what her issues were. Welfare fraud? Too bad. Take her kids and give them to people that can afford to take care of them. Murder? Same thing. Good people do not break the law and have their kids in jail. She wants us to feel sorry for her because she is a two-bit who**. No sympathy!

35820764
Flag this comment

2cents said on January 17, 2010 at 10:44 AM

My sympathy meter is having trouble. 1 - She had free delivery care and everyone was healthy. 2 - She was in prison. Why? Because we were picking on her, or because she earned the punishment. I suspect she earned the punishment. 3 - That's what prison is, or should be; the loss of ones freedoms. The only reason I would support any such legislation is to prevent these incarcerated criminals from being able to sue. Take, take, take, that's all they do. And then blame us and complain some more.

35798579
Flag this comment

norskdavid said on January 16, 2010 at 6:03 PM

planetbjr.... first you call the people who posted here judgmental stone throwers, yet you are waiting at bay to throw stones at those who post.... hmmmm... your hypocrisy is so democratic. Thanks for being what you hate.

35771839
Flag this comment

seattle1111 said on January 16, 2010 at 5:06 PM

@planetbjr:stop crying,you bleeding heart!YOU can take care of this woman's ten children while she is in and out of prison!I have zero sympathy for her.I'm sick of criminals getting rights.Quit complaining!You made your bed,now lie in it!

35769914
Flag this comment

planetbjr said on January 16, 2010 at 4:45 PM

All of you knuckle dragging stone throwers, so quick to judge are you? Lie to yourselves as you cram more garbage into your overstuffed rancid closets. Go ahead, cloak your puritain blsht cream all over your faces. The truth (look in the mirror) is in your responses. There is darkness in each and every one of you and you are litteraly a single choice away from unleashing it. March us all to armmegedon you friggin zionist. Short of aziza's comment, you all should be shackeled. I'll be there right next to you. And yes, casting my rocks in your direction.

35769219
Flag this comment

speedracer said on January 16, 2010 at 4:09 PM

callmecrazy... not to bad...I want to hear more,I know you people have some good name's for her "Precious" baby born in prison...

35768102
Flag this comment

wolfrayet said on January 16, 2010 at 4:05 PM

Great comment sumithryo, I say no more tax/welfare breaks after two kids and tax penalties for any more after that. As far as chaining her up, she's a criminal and needs to be controled until she's served her time.

35767987
Flag this comment

callmecrazy said on January 16, 2010 at 3:35 PM

Maybe she wasd doing time for welfare fraud, after all some will keep pumping out the kids for that free meal ticket. How about name Shack for the newborn?

35766994
Flag this comment

aziza said on January 16, 2010 at 2:29 PM

I still have a hard time imagining what threat a woman in labor would present? How far can you get in between contractions? How far can you run during hard labor? IF women have to be shackled with a three foot chain to keep from escaping while giving birth- what is the logic? Can't they therefore pull a Hannibal Lector with that three foot chain? Procedure is procedure and if a prisoner is in a hospital, then there needs to be restraint correct? Its not about what threat a woman in labor would present, its about being consistent across the board. All prisoner patients need to be shackled. A woman giving birth is not a threatening thing, otherwise the first person we'd harm would be the guy that did this to us! I don't see a sudden uptick in the amount of fathers being killed while in the delivery room.

35764974
Flag this comment

trucker45 said on January 16, 2010 at 1:26 PM

Its like ready made news. A pregnant inmate escaped today while not restrained at the hospital. A recently passed law gave convicted felons the right to not be restrained because it violated their rights to a speedy escape when no one is looking. The nurse who was with the felon is expected to survive her injuries.

35763099
Flag this comment

jetcitywoman said on January 16, 2010 at 1:19 PM

I personally hope this law does NOT pass - these women are in prison for a reason, and I was especially affected by the post by obnurse1. There are consequences for your actions - having TEN children, ending up in prison - I would think the last of her worries would be the fact that she is in restraints giving birth... she has the word "restraint" all wrong - maybe a little bit of PERSONAL RESTRAINT would have been a good idea, and she wouldn't be in the place she's in right now. I have no sympathy for her whatsoever, and I would hope that the DOC would want to protect it's workers instead of it's inmates.

35762914
Flag this comment

skippypotpiebaby said on January 16, 2010 at 1:08 PM

Wow the law is not for kimmy is it Don't all mothers in jail do this?

35762532
Flag this comment

deniseh1006 said on January 16, 2010 at 11:46 AM

What was the mother of TEN in prison for in the first place? Don't blame the system because you can't get your sh** together and be a mom! What if it was some murderer that could grab a piece of medical equipment and stab the doctor or nurse? I have no sympathy for anyone in prison other than the ones that are actually innocent, they killed an abusive spouce, or they killed a child molestor.

35759757
Flag this comment

aziza said on January 16, 2010 at 9:32 AM

How far would she get in an escape attempt while in labor?

35754359
Flag this comment

jimd30 said on January 16, 2010 at 7:45 AM

I think they should be handcuffed, they are property of the state... if you don't want to be handcuffed then make better choices to not go to prison!!!

35749737
Flag this comment

speedracer said on January 16, 2010 at 7:06 AM

I wonder where her husband/bf was?Solitary at Walla Walla is my guess.Names anyone?Slash,D.J.Lethal,etc.....

35748204
Flag this comment

sumner_son said on January 16, 2010 at 6:26 AM

Well said, obnurse1. My personal opinion: Time to sterilize that one, and use a little clorox in the gene pool.

35747117
Flag this comment

obnurse1 said on January 16, 2010 at 6:21 AM

As an experienced Labor & Delivery RN who has worked with inmates at St Joes, I am offended that anyone would dare to put the "rights" of a convicted criminal above that of my personal safety! Let us not forget that these are prisoners, (they didn't get there for shoplifting). A hospital setting is riddled with opportunity to injure themselves or others in an attempt to escape. Healthcare workers, other patients and newborns should NOT be put at risk to make a criminals birth experience more warm & fuzzy. You don't like your birth experience in shackles? Quit breaking the law!

35746989
Flag this comment

billiameveryman said on January 16, 2010 at 5:37 AM

This is terrible, oh wait, she was in prison because she's an effing criminal, eff her... Maybe next time, (and I'm sure there will be a next time, 10 kids?, jeepers!) don't go to prison for child birth... Some people should be sterilized, starting with this jail-bird baby-factory...

35745917
Flag this comment

jpublic said on January 16, 2010 at 1:30 AM

What a stupid, stupid suit. Ask many woman who gave birth 30 to 40 years ago. Many hospitals did strap a woman down via wrist restaints as a matter of policy. Not female inmates, everyday law abiding women. It isn't that tramatic. Merely yet another slum bag whining. If she wanted to have a different experience giving birth to her "10th" state supported baby, she should not have done the crime. No doubt our bleeding heart ivy tower lawmakers will cave and ban inmates being cuffed. When someone is hurt or killed by one of these "poor" inmates, they will retract it.

35742419
Flag this comment

taxdollarswasted said on January 15, 2010 at 11:57 PM

Ten kids, how many more of your kids were prison babies that we have to pay for. I guess you weren't accepted into the baby program there, so maybe your security threat level or your prior crimes committed might have played a part in your situation. As they say, " if you can do the crime then you can do the time." Get a job to support all those kids other than criminal activity. Women can be just as dangerous as men, stop using gender as an excuse.

35740507
Flag this comment

norskdavid said on January 15, 2010 at 10:56 PM

If anyone feels sorry for this woman... feel sorry for her 10 kids, not her traumatic experience while being incarcerated. She was in PRISON. Did anyone read this part..... "On average, 30 inmates a year from the Gig Harbor facility give birth." I think Bob Barker should visit the prisons. sumithryo.... best comment of the year! Well played.

35739007
Flag this comment

factoid said on January 15, 2010 at 9:17 PM

Sounds like there might be an interesting back story here. It does seem like the typical Government behavior to shackle someone during child birth. Always more concerned with procedure than result.

35735967
Flag this comment

sumithryo said on January 15, 2010 at 8:59 PM

TEN KIDS???? I say handcuff her legs together!!!

35735369
Flag this comment

seattle1111 said on January 15, 2010 at 8:32 PM

Kimberly Mays needs to get fixed!

35734487
Flag this comment