Print
Email
Share

Seattle police should wear body cameras, says councilman

by LINDA BRILL / KING 5 News

KING5.com

Posted on February 14, 2011 at 7:36 PM

SEATTLE – The time has come for Seattle police officers to start wearing body cameras, says one city councilman.

Four body cameras are on loan to the Seattle police department, but the department has held off on testing them.

Lake Forest Park police have been testing the cameras for about a year. An officer wearing the camera tells people right off the bat that they are being recorded.

"I've contacted drivers who are obviously very upset on traffic stops. Once I've identified that they're being recorded, all of a sudden I see the anger, the attitude, things like that actually drop down," said Officer Morris Parrish. "For me personally, I found it helps me watch what I'm saying."

"I know the public wants great public safety, they want accountability, and they want to use new technology," said Councilman Bruce Harrell, who wrote on op-ed letter to The Seattle Times.

Dramatic patrol car dash-cam video showed Seattle Police Officer Ian Birk demand that John T. Williams, a native woodcarver, drop his knife last August. Birk could be heard opening fire, killing Williams, but it was out of view of the camera. We'd likely know a lot more about the reasons for the shooting if Birk had worn a body camera.

Seattle police will eventually test the body cameras, said Mayor Mike McGinn Monday.

"We have to make sure we have the policies in place to understand how they should be used, when they should be on or off. How do we store the data we get from them," said McGinn.

There are privacy issues that concern the Seattle Police Guild. It says the use of body cameras will have to be negotiated as part of their contract which expires next year.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 15 of 19

forrestgump1967 said on February 15, 2011 at 1:44 PM

Police being required to have body cameras is an excellent idea. Maybe this will make Police in Seattle WA more accountable for their actions and to ensure that proper protocol is followed when dealing with the public and make it harder for Prosecutors not to file criminal charges when a police officer commits a criminal act such as assault, police brutality and abuse of police powers.

60567412
Flag this comment

karmaworks said on February 15, 2011 at 10:58 AM

Freedomthinker..Public employees must have privacy rights for their privacy. Think about this..I am a public service employee, I respond to emergencies, 911 calls. We are confronted with threats to ourselves very frequently, this in turn is taken to me to protect my privacy (first and last name) cause god forbid any retaliation against me is retaliation against possibly my family...co-workers (my brothers and sisters)..anybody who represents who I work for. Trust me there are people out there that I have dealt with on numerous occasions that know my name and when I work. I must protect myself and I deserve privacy when Im off duty. I will always be accountable for my actions on and off duty, thats my personell committment but I will protect my family, co-workers and the public. Privacy is everybodies personell right. My actions are nobodies business other than those who are involved and my employer.

60554964
Flag this comment

rottenlegsforyou said on February 15, 2011 at 9:58 AM

I think all city government officials should be accountable and recorded whenever a discussion or decision is made about the public. For example, why did the Chief candidate quickly drop out after meeting with the mayor, what was said? That experienced Cheif bailed out and fast! Why should officers just be recorded, what about judges, prosecutors and the higher people in the SPD? Thats where the important decisions are made, right? Id like to know exactly what the MAYOR is saying right now and what he says while bike riding. I remember Jesse Jackson saying he'd like to cut off Obams nu.. right now and he didnt know it was caught on camera. Seems like police are taking all the missile hits and the shots should be shared by all for a real transparent government.

60550254
Flag this comment

pikgitar72185148 said on February 15, 2011 at 3:42 AM

Good Idea but I don't see it happening. "The Guild" won't likely want real evidence to contradict "The Truth" as stated by the cops. Until then private citizens are going to have to start shooting video with cell phones and other personal recording devices. Remember, when in Seattle, when you see a cop, most likely a crime will be in the making. Remember also that these crimes can happen within 10 seconds from the moment of "contact" to the "Dead End". With that in mind, also know this: Cops can and will say that your recording device "Looked like a Gun" after they shoot you for pointing a lens in their direction.

60532059
Flag this comment

freedomthinker said on February 15, 2011 at 12:16 AM

personally i never understood why PUBLIC employees have any rights to privacy while at work. if you want to have a PRIVATE life, don't work for the PUBLIC.

60529977
Flag this comment

hoppdrop said on February 15, 2011 at 12:15 AM

Was pulled over and given a ticket coming back from Montana this last weekend for going 82 in a 70mph. First thing the officer said was"you are being recorded during this stop". I had nothing really to say besides"yes officer and no officer" but I also noticed that the officer wasnt really allowed to have any personality either. What that means, I dont know, but there was NO room for breaks either way.

60529963
Flag this comment

jdinkitsap said on February 14, 2011 at 11:43 PM

Oh ya- & the cops shouldn't be able to turn off the camera so they can pound on somebody. Kind of defeats the purpose of having them!

60529538
Flag this comment

captjp said on February 14, 2011 at 10:42 PM

How about we make the criminal wear the cameras? The officer already carrys a ton of equipment. How about the Councilman carries a camera with him so we could see how our tax dollars are being misused.

60528447
Flag this comment

jaxter said on February 14, 2011 at 9:50 PM

With all of the mishaps going on with Seattle Police--I see this as a good idea. Hopefully the city can get funding and make it happen. I know that councilman Harrell is pushing for it. I heard Diaz is supportive too. It is time.

60527244
Flag this comment

foody said on February 14, 2011 at 9:34 PM

I support Bruce Harrell's proposal to do this. It will not only hold officers accountable, but as the officer in lake Forest Park stated the public's attitude changes when they find out they are on camera. Accountability on both sides creates a situations that are less likely to escalate.

60526661
Flag this comment

fleetwood said on February 14, 2011 at 8:40 PM

Well it benefits all. Subjective conversation will narrow itself from they said and they said. I believe law enforcement will see in the end, less abusive dialogue given to them, and quell dialogue given hense forth. Not to forget the fatal shooting of the Native American incident. A camera would save us all the tax payer's money in finding the facts in this sad incident.

60524847
Flag this comment

enumscrat said on February 14, 2011 at 8:39 PM

Perhaps the Mayor's and respective councilmen should wear the cameras for a really wonderful test of politics in action first?! That would seem to be a fair way to see whom is throwing stones at whom.

60524789
Flag this comment

stryker said on February 14, 2011 at 8:28 PM

"We'd likely know a lot more about the reasons for the shooting if Birk had worn a body camera." YEA, YOU WOULD KNOW BIRK IS A MURDERER, DUH!

60524439
Flag this comment

jdinkitsap said on February 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM

I have to say another thing though. When I mentioned this a couple years ago, the response was that the policeman's union wouldn't allow it because they say it doesn't show the whole picture. Sounds to me like they want to be able to make up the story themselves.

60524079
Flag this comment

logic14 said on February 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM

Once you put on the camera you longer are allowed to have any private comments. Which means if you display any frustration, someone failing to yield to emergency lights, and you voice your frustrations, it gets recorded. Everyone is human and gets frustrated and alone in their car they may have a private outburst. Once the camera is there, the police supervisors will write up the officers even though no one could hear the comment and the person that they were referring to. They can be a great tool and collect wonderful evidence. Ninety-nine percent of the time the camera proves that complaints are false, that the citizen was lying. I think that an officer's comments alone in his car should be left that way. If everyone was recorded all the time everyone would get in trouble!

60524059
Flag this comment

lattelisa said on February 14, 2011 at 8:17 PM

It's about time! I'm so glad cops will have to wear cameras. They lied once and it cost me a fortune.

60524007
Flag this comment

jdinkitsap said on February 14, 2011 at 8:15 PM

I've been saying this for years! Excellent idea! & it would show irrefutable, unbiased proof.

60523931
Flag this comment

franky said on February 14, 2011 at 7:56 PM

Bruce Herrell should have to wear a body camera when he is on the clock too, to make sure he is being accountable.

60523254
Flag this comment

skippythedog said on February 14, 2011 at 7:45 PM

Why not? I don't get stopped very often, but I'm prepared to record as well; same as most people w/ current cell phone technology.....So, nothing should get misconstrued, huh?

60522899
Flag this comment