Print
Email
Share

Seattle community centers and pools may close

by LINDA BRILL / KING 5 News

KING5.com

Posted on April 27, 2010 at 1:28 PM

Updated Tuesday, Apr 27 at 6:48 PM

SEATTLE - Outgoing superintendent of Seattle Parks and Recreation Tim Gallagher says mid-year budget reductions of three percent will likely result in the closure of community centers and pools, as early as June.

The Seattle Parks Department is considering the closure of two community centers and two to three community swimming pools within the next few weeks.

Because the Ballard Community Center and the Loyal Heights Community Center are close to each other, one of them is vulnerable to closure.

"We're ready to collapse here." said Gallagher, who resigned Monday, effective May 10, after media reports of his travel expenses to a parks conference in Australia.

Gallagher says along with community centers and pools, 24 of Seattle's 27 public wading pools may close in June. Three wading pools - at Lincoln Park, Green Lake and Volunteer Park - will remain open.

The closures are under consideration because of a $2.5 million mid-year budget gap. Gallagher predicts that more closures will come in 2011, when the Parks Department faces larger budget deficits.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 7 of 7

scott_bellevue said on April 28, 2010 at 7:44 AM

The discussions on this board are stupid and have nothing to do with the article. How about some serious questions. Such as, how many visitors does the Seattle Parks department expect in the next three months of summer? Do the math and figure out what you would need to charge to offset the cost. With 24 locations closing, and a shortfall of $2.5 million, you wouldn't need to charge much to offset the cost. This kind of logic should be presented by both the city and King 5's terrible reporting, which only posts city announcements like this with zero investigative reporting. If this is important to Seattle and its residents, we should be discussing it here and elsewhere, and exploring options, as opposed to presenting a regurgitated article followed by derelict discussion of an entirely different topic.

42147228
Flag this comment

mzalbo22 said on April 28, 2010 at 6:53 AM

Just to add to that - I'm not sure WHY the Viaduct became a discussion piece in this article...as far as the parks go - it is sad. BUT, I know that if they were discussing raising the fee to get into the park to cover some of the maintenence charges people would freak out. It's nearly impossible to please people in Seattle.

42142927
Flag this comment

mzalbo22 said on April 28, 2010 at 6:51 AM

The tunnel may be a fiasco but it's necessary. A surface street cannot contain the amount of traffic that is needed to replace the Viaduct, BUT, the viaduct *needs* to be replaced.

42142809
Flag this comment

gerhart said on April 27, 2010 at 6:02 PM

Gallagher leaving is the best news I've heard all week. He was only concerned with ball fields and pools and he didn't care that most of the trees and native plants in our parks are being killed by all that English ivy that's invaded our parks. And yes, we don't need a money-hole tunnel that the voters said they don't want - a surface street solution is possible and much cheaper. Healthy parks are more important. But the politicians don't care what the voters want. Wait and see - this tunnel is going to be a fiasco!

42114588
Flag this comment

rangerxlt said on April 27, 2010 at 3:30 PM

The superintendent of parks is not an elected position. He was appointed by the late mayor nickles. That's not the only mess nickles left behind.

42106784
Flag this comment

tacwilster said on April 27, 2010 at 2:02 PM

Wait till the tunnell fills with water and then you can go swimming! Dumb government officials, more important are the parks than a stupid tunnel.

42100928
Flag this comment

pixelater said on April 27, 2010 at 1:46 PM

That sucks for you people in Seattle, but you keep electing those idiots. Look on the bright side , you're going to get a new tunnel with the promise of no cost overuns. Anyone over there want to buy a bridge.

42099522
Flag this comment