Print
Email
Share

Public art project comes down - did police cross a line?

by ERIC WILKINSON / KING 5 News

KING5.com

Posted on July 28, 2010 at 4:29 PM

SEATTLE - For more than a year an art display sat in the vacant lot at the corner of 23rd and Union in Seattle's Central District.  Dubbed "The Corner," the project was to serve as a "snapshot" of a complex community at that moment in time.  Its creator calls it a "collaborative community storytelling project." 

But the display of photos and stories has now been dismantled, much to the dismay of many who live there. 

"I think it was kind of beautiful," says Kalyx Deveaux. 

"When I walked by today I wondered where it went, and why," pondered Barbara Jackson, who has lived in the neighborhood for more than 40 years.

"Why" is a very good question.

When "The Corner" was unveiled last summer, one of the photos depicted a man known in the neighborhood as "Saviour Knowledge."  Saviour's real name is Anthony Knowles. He is a convicted felon who admits to killing a man in New York in 1987, and just last month he was arrested for allegedly selling crack - right across the street from his picture at 23rd and Union.

"I should be considered innocent until proven guilty," he said in his gravelly voice.

Despite his past, Knowles is a popular member of the community who sweeps the streets in the area around 23rd & Union every day. He believes police are targeting the art because of his background. 

"They're doing it without a doubt, without a doubt," he said.

He may be right.

KING 5 News has obtained an e-mail from a Seattle Police officer to both the organizer of the exhibit and the property owner alleging complaints from neighbors about Knowles's photo. It reads, "They are asking me to ask you to please take down his picture."

We asked police officials to put us in touch with those who complained, but they refused.

In the meantime those left tearing the exhibit down wonder whether police can legally use their authority to "persuade" a private property owner to take down a piece of public art. 

"Property owners can display any kind of art on their property that they choose," said Joe Martinez, the designer of the project. "I mean, it's the Unites States of America."

A spokesman for the Seattle ACLU says it does appear SPD may have overstepped its bounds in this case because no laws were being broken. Doug Honig says even if someone was offended by the exhibit, it's not up to police to play art critic. 

 "It's between the person who is offended and the property owner," said Honig. "The police should play no part in it."

A Seattle Police spokesman tells KING 5 the department did act within its purview when it relayed the concerns of neighbors to the artists.  Sgt. Sean Whitcomb says it's part of good community policing.  

"We're not out there judging art," he says.  "But our officers are out there to help people solve problems."   

In the meantime, supporters of the art project are considering a lawsuit.

Print
Email
Share

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 10 of 10

jinkiesshaggy said on July 29, 2010 at 10:28 AM

and the property owner says.......??? BTW if you were going to put anything there, and I do live 3 blocks away, you SHOULD put a staue of Ms. Helen, in memorium of all that great food we are missing from the neighborhood since the earthquake to her restaurant.

48760479
Flag this comment

cibicsi said on July 29, 2010 at 8:46 AM

The property owner was not forced to take it down, and the police did not take it down. The police just contacted the property owner and told him that some community members were offended by his art, and the artist had it taken down when they were informed of this. The police job is not only to enforce laws but, also to be a public servant and by contacting the artist they were just being a public servant, although if they told him to take it down a line would be crossed what the story reads and what should have been said is, "some community memebers are offended by the art and they would like it seen taken down, although you aren't breaking any laws and you are not required to."

48748654
Flag this comment

ringer said on July 29, 2010 at 5:52 AM

Can you say POLICE STATE!!

48727699
Flag this comment

cvn65 said on July 29, 2010 at 5:30 AM

If this art was authorized by the property owner to be there then the cops did indeed overstep their authority.

48725054
Flag this comment

javajoe said on July 29, 2010 at 3:01 AM

I support SPD in this effort and claim they were just exercising their artistic expression for the sake of creating a healthy dialog. Nice job, very creative.

48712064
Flag this comment

skippythedog said on July 28, 2010 at 11:50 PM

This guy was advertising his "wares" via this outlet.....Illegal drugs. I don't think free speech should encompass that.

48706784
Flag this comment

raoulfasahd said on July 28, 2010 at 9:36 PM

Shame on the Seattle Police Department! It just goes to show that nothing has really changed over the years. Someone is annoyed by an exhibit on private property and they complain to the police who eventually tear down the art. What's happened to freedom of speech? I expect the public outcry will be so enormous that the art work will be reinstalled. Once again, shame on the Seattle Police Department! Shame! Shame! Shame!

48703089
Flag this comment

justthinkin said on July 28, 2010 at 9:11 PM

Maybe they moved it to the dump to save us tax payers a fortune. Any story to trash police these days is golden. Get over it and move on.

48702202
Flag this comment

confusement said on July 28, 2010 at 7:50 PM

Why does the reporter say that Mr. Knowles was arrested for selling crack, but not include the fact that he was also arrested for felon in possession of a firearm? So we have a murderer, on drugs, with a firearm, who neighbors are complaining about, and we should hold him up as "representative" of our community but posting his likeness as art? Give me a break! Nice message to kids in the CD!! The cop, in doing community policing, conveyed the concerns of neighbors to those responsible for the project. They chose to dismantle the whole thing rather than "disrespect" a murdering crack dealer. Disgusting.

48698319
Flag this comment

tregare said on July 28, 2010 at 5:54 PM

of course there is the implied threat of an "or else" because it is coming from a police officer.

48690334
Flag this comment

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?

Register Now

Member Benefits

Link your account to your Twitter or Facebook account for easier login!

Link your account to your Facebook profile Link your account to your Twitter profile

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

* - Indicates required field

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

Connecting to

You may need to allow pop up window for this step of registration

Just one more step:

Please take a moment to review the available e-mail newsletters has to offer. Place a checkbox next to the newsletters you wish to subscribe to.

Welcome.

Thank you for becoming a member of KING5.com. You now have full access to the best local coverage and late breaking news from KING5.com. Soon you will be redirected to the page you were seeking, and a confirmation email will be delivered to you.

You will need to respond to the confirmation e-mail for your account to be activated.

KING5.com is dedicated to bringing you exceptional news and outstanding information services, all while personalizing it to your liking. We're sure you'll enjoy being a KING5.com member! If you need assistance, please contact us.