Print
Email
Share

Pierce Co. considers banning smoking in apartments

by Associated Press

KING5.com

Posted on August 29, 2010 at 2:38 PM

Updated Sunday, Aug 29 at 5:08 PM

TACOMA, Wash. - The fight over smoking restrictions in Washington state has moved from bars and office-buildings to private residences.

The News Tribune reports that a group called People United for Smoke-Free Housing has asked the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Board to classify secondhand smoke as a "nuisance" in multi-unit housing, because smoke can seep from one apartment to another and bother other residents. That could allow landlords to evict people for smoking.

The proposal, which backers hope to have inserted into the state's landlord-tenant law, is one of dozens of attempts in communities around the country to extend no-smoking restrictions to rental housing.

"This is the last piece of the puzzle that needs to be placed," said Nan Hogan of University Place, who helped write the proposed legislation. "We've got smoke-free motel rooms, smoke-free restaurants, smoke-free bars, smoke-free office buildings and even prisons. Why should we go home and have to breathe it there?"

PUSH wants the board to pass the proposal, so that it can then can use it as ammunition in its effort for a statewide law change during the next legislative session.

Opponents argue that such proposals are unnecessary because landlords can already declare their apartments smoke-free if they want to.

"This is political correctness run amok," said Gary Nolan, U.S. director of the Citizens Freedom Alliance, which advocates for smokers' rights. "They're taking away the rights of the landlord. We have a republic, and they're telling this guy what he can do with his private property."

Under the proposal, PUSH says, tenants bothered by smoke could make complaints. Just as with other nuisances under the law -- such as destroying property and using drugs -- offenders could be given three days' notice to move out. If they don't move, the landlord can go to court and start an eviction process.

The state Department of Health says 86 percent of renters in Washington prefer smoke-free housing and 500 children younger than age 5 get asthma in the state every year from breathing secondhand smoke.

Nationally, 27 local jurisdictions have passed ordinances limiting or prohibiting smoking altogether in multi-unit rentals, including eight cities in California.

The Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department and its board, which will look at the proposal at a study session Sept. 15, have historically taken the lead on anti-smoking issues.

The department's former director, Dr. Federico Cruz-Uribe, banned most outside advertising of tobacco products in 1996, then created a furor in 2003 by banning smoking in most indoor public places, including the county's bars, restaurants and bowling alleys.

The Washington State Supreme Court threw out Pierce County's ban, but two years later it became the model for a successful statewide indoor smoking initiative.

The department's current director, Dr. Anthony Chen, supports the idea of smoke-free apartments but worries the legislation could have unintended consequences. It could unfairly affect low-income people and minorities, groups more likely to be smokers and also more likely to be renters.

 

 

Print
Email
Share

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 15 of 24

kaosfreak said on September 16, 2010 at 8:42 AM

akamai let me change a bit of your comment around to fit with OUR situation... but before the no "scent" policy began being enforced, I had several serious, "deadly" medical issues because of my neighbors' "scents" entering my unit. I do not have air conditioning, but could not open a single window in my unit during the hot summer weather because of my medical issues, but the "people" were allowed to open theirs and let the toxic "scent" out for their neighbors to enjoy. Yes, it DOES enter other open windows. "People that use scents such as perfumes, scented laundry soap, bleach, air freshener, vinegar", as usual, think only of themselves and refuse to understand the problems they can cause others. (everything in quotes is my change) So.. should there be a law now that you can NOT use perfumes or scented products of any kind? Or any strong scents even? Because those are all deadly to a member of my household. He can not go anywhere anymore because of these things. Think about it.

52038234
Flag this comment

kvet1 said on August 30, 2010 at 5:03 PM

I cannot believe so many are defending these anti-smoking fanatics. Smokers are being denied their rights and shoved out of their own lifestyles and maybe even forced to go onto some drug therapy to cutdown or quit agaisnt their own will. I cannot believe the Governator has been allowed to get away with her over taxation either on tobacco . i find it all anti-american and agravating. People have smoked since before George Washington and it is part of american culture and now fanatics want to run our lives and tell us we cannot smoke on the job, in bars, at home, on the earth? If i am forced to quit smoking i hope they are forced to pay my dr. bills to help me quit & quitting will be against my free will.

50926588
Flag this comment

rigidprinciples said on August 30, 2010 at 3:08 PM

It seems strange at a minimum, and borderline mentally ill, to move into an apartment building that allows smoking, if you don't like smoke. The only thing I can imagine is someone held a gun to your head, and forced you to live there. This is America, where you always have a choice. If you need to find non-smoking apartment buildings, move to Portland, Oregon, the anti-smoking nazi capital of the world.

50920754
Flag this comment

akamai said on August 30, 2010 at 2:10 PM

I can't believe so many people are defending the smokers! Sure, if the smoker wants to smoke in his own home, let him. But in an apartment or condo situation, the smoker should not be allowed to let the smoke escape his windows or doors and become a problem for his neighbor. I am now in a smoke free condo, but before the no smoking policy began being enforced, I had several serious, expensive medical issues because of my neighbors' smoke entering my unit. I do not have air conditioning, but could not open a single window in my unit during the hot summer weather because of my medical issues, but the smokers were allowed to open theirs and let the toxic smoke out for their neighbors to "enjoy". Yes, it DOES enter other open windows. Smokers, as usual, think only of themselves and refuse to understand the problems they can cause others. On the other hand, I do think there should be bars or other places smokers can smoke without bothering others, and without being harassed by non smokers.

50917919
Flag this comment

semisweet said on August 30, 2010 at 11:45 AM

To Nan Hogan, you are doing more harm to society than cigarettes do. Please go away.

50909561
Flag this comment

rigidprinciples said on August 30, 2010 at 8:54 AM

I hear what you are saying Jay Johnson, but the big issue is that non-smokers become addicted to smoking environments such as bars. Once a non-smoker becomes addicted to a smoking bar, who is supposed to protect the non-smoker from themself ? One possibility would be adding a sales tax to alcohol, which would fund a support person for each addicted non-smoker. The support person could walk around with the addicted non-smoker all day, and when the non-smoker couldn't help themself, and went to a smoking bar, or tried to get an apartment that allowed smoking, the support person could take them by the hand, and gently pull them away, whispering "Hey, don't go there, you don't like smoke". It would cost millions, but it may be the only way to truly protect the addicted non-smoker from themself. They need to be teaching the children more about the dangers of non-smokers becoming addicted to smoking environments.

50897289
Flag this comment

jayjohnson said on August 30, 2010 at 7:33 AM

I totally disagree with every anti-smoking law. I myself do not smoke, but building owners should have the right to decide whether or not they would like to allow smoking. This applys to bars, restaurants, private residences, and so on. It is totally ridiculous to all-but ban a completely legal substance. If smoking is that big a problem, why don't we just outlaw it completely?

50891409
Flag this comment

dede1978 said on August 30, 2010 at 7:25 AM

I'm a smoker, own my home and choose to smoke outside. I also agree with most of the posters. I think they should let the decision be the owner's. If we let this go, what is next? I do know there are smoke free apartments out there, so if you don't like it, move to a smoke free apartment complex. Let the landlords decide if they will allow smoking or not.

50890761
Flag this comment

clear2copy said on August 30, 2010 at 2:34 AM

Suck it up, wheezers

50875089
Flag this comment

rigidprinciples said on August 29, 2010 at 11:47 PM

Why are non-smokers so addicted to apartment buildings that allow smoking ?

50872313
Flag this comment

kaci96 said on August 29, 2010 at 10:22 PM

As a landlord, how do they expect you to inforce this? Would it be the same as drugs? You suspect they are smoking inside their rental but need to have the cops there to do a knock and talk and get proof before you can start the eviction process? I mean, you could say anyone is smoking in their unit and not have proof... which leads to a whole other issue of fair housing and discrimination. Too thin of a line to walk when your talking about landlords and the sue-happy public.

50871103
Flag this comment

baristababy said on August 29, 2010 at 9:55 PM

@Kryptin, you took the words right out of my mouth!

50870696
Flag this comment

skippypotpiebaby said on August 29, 2010 at 8:02 PM

What is next?

50868236
Flag this comment

ginas said on August 29, 2010 at 7:28 PM

seriously, where is the line drawn?

50866894
Flag this comment

kryptin said on August 29, 2010 at 7:21 PM

I don't smoke and I hate smoking, but I do believe a person has the right to smoke if they so want in their own home. I can see why people would want this especially landlords as smoke gets everywhere and damages property, but to require all apartments and such to be non-smoking is going to far.

50866659
Flag this comment

dakotanative said on August 29, 2010 at 6:00 PM

I don't think this is any worse than banning it in bars. But than again, banning it in a bar where anyone can choose not to go is so stupid that I can't believe the sheep went for it. Actually, I think that having smoke seep into your home from the neighbors is worse than smoking in a bar. You could move in next to a non-smoker that leaves and is replaced by a smoker. That is unfair to you. Requiring owners to regulate smoking is wrong, but it would be welcome to many if they offered non-smoking buildings with a very hefty fine for violations.

50863573
Flag this comment

lsmith5870400119 said on August 29, 2010 at 5:02 PM

typical big city politics. Someone trying to run other peoples lives.

50861276
Flag this comment

kbbcoop said on August 29, 2010 at 4:40 PM

its amazing the State keeps raising the prices of smokes, up to over 7 dollars a pack now, then keep restricting where you can smoke them, ie bars, parks, 20 feet from doors, and now your own home! Isnt it also a nuisance to drink a half gallon of booze (which the state sells in state run stores) and then stumble out to your car and plow into somebody at a red light? 1984 folks, just drive through Lynnwood now, a bank of cameras at every intersection, now even on side streets...

50860493
Flag this comment

cj_voges said on August 29, 2010 at 4:26 PM

Great idea. Now, they'll just smoke outside your door like they do mine.

50860014
Flag this comment

eightinchgoat said on August 29, 2010 at 4:10 PM

I can hear it now: "Just think of the children!" I mean, look at the statistics. Since Washington banned smoking in bars, no children have gotten cancer from second hand smoke in a bar. You can't argue with logic like that. I'm just surprised that this is happening in Pierce county BEFORE the city of Seattle.

50859573
Flag this comment

h8red42 said on August 29, 2010 at 4:08 PM

I may have quit smoking, but this goes to far and should be opposed by every one interested in personal freedom.if the state can tell you not to smoke in your own home what else will they tell you to do/not do? when does your life become the states?

50859531
Flag this comment

keckroth said on August 29, 2010 at 4:03 PM

As the parent of a child w asthma, I would be much more inclined to rent an apartment in a non-smoking complex, or a non-smoking building in a complex where you can choose smoking or non...but an across-the-board ban just creates the mess of trying to enforce it.

50859381
Flag this comment

tugthug said on August 29, 2010 at 3:41 PM

As an ex-smoker myself I have to agree with collegeguy. A man should not be told what he can or cannot do in his own home. It's just wrong!

50858803
Flag this comment

collegeguy said on August 29, 2010 at 2:45 PM

I don't smoke but this is going WAY too far and violates civil liberties guaranteed by the laws of this country. If the landlord chooses it to be a smoke free building that is one thing since they own the place. Forcing landlord to make that choice is completely wrong.

50857058
Flag this comment

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?

Register Now

Member Benefits

Link your account to your Twitter or Facebook account for easier login!

Link your account to your Facebook profile Link your account to your Twitter profile

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

* - Indicates required field

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

Connecting to

You may need to allow pop up window for this step of registration

Just one more step:

Please take a moment to review the available e-mail newsletters has to offer. Place a checkbox next to the newsletters you wish to subscribe to.

Welcome.

Thank you for becoming a member of KING5.com. You now have full access to the best local coverage and late breaking news from KING5.com. Soon you will be redirected to the page you were seeking, and a confirmation email will be delivered to you.

You will need to respond to the confirmation e-mail for your account to be activated.

KING5.com is dedicated to bringing you exceptional news and outstanding information services, all while personalizing it to your liking. We're sure you'll enjoy being a KING5.com member! If you need assistance, please contact us.