Print
Email
Share

Lawsuit grows from Bainbridge Island vegetation rules

by GARY CHITTIM / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @gchittimK5

KING5.com

Posted on February 19, 2010 at 6:29 PM

Updated Friday, Feb 19 at 6:29 PM

BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, Wash. - "Welcome to Brain Damaged Island," joked Bainbridge Island homeowner and real estate agent Doug Nelson.

He doesn't really mean it. He loves Bainbridge, grew up there and plans to stay there. But he and, according to his attorney, many other residents are fed up with the city's code on Native Vegetation Zones, NVZs.

The City Codes state: "Its purpose is to protect and enhance the Island's natural character, water quality, native plant communities, and wildlife habitat along the shoreline."

But Nelson says it's gone too far and is reaching beyond city limits into his yard.

 

 

"We have no lawn out here to throw a Frisbee, catch a ball, kick a soccer ball back and forth," said Nelson who just celebrated the birth of his sixth child. "I'm left with thorny bushes and salal."

The NVZ requires Nelson to plant only native vegetation on his beachfront yard, forbids him to put in a lawn, or wide paths, or any structures including benches or decks in the vast majority his yard. He claims his yard is more protected than the public beach between it and Puget Sound.

Nelson has gone along with the code so far, but is now suing the city. His attorney says Nelson is just one of several people seeking legal advice and possible law suits over NVZs.

"It's this idea that you have no choice. You will march and you will with little or no discretion," said attorney Dennis Reynolds. "It pushes people."

Several communities have similar vegetation buffer rules as they try to meet standards imposed by state and federal governments and some are facing similar lawsuits. They defend them as rules to protect Puget Sound and other water bodies.

Bainbridge Island city officials refused several offers to defend the ordinance saying now that there is litigation involved, they can't discuss it. A spokesman referred us to a State Department of Ecology representative who said, they support many municipal beach protection measures, but had nothing to do the Bainbridge Island code.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 9 of 9

kingnews11 said on February 22, 2010 at 11:00 AM

The fact of the matter is that Bainbridge Island is going bankrupt enforcing an SMP beyond its legal jurisdiction and in direct opposition to the adopted statewide shoreline standards. This is not a sustainable practice unless the state or federal government changes their stance on these issues. I believe the environmentalists do have noble intentions but they fail to bring convincing data to their arguements. The homeowners will continue to push for their property rights despite their proximity to the waterline as most Americans who own property are want to do. This doesn't even begin to speak to the feasibility of enforcement of such regulations in a local economy that is failing, has eliminated its mayoral position, and has a revolving door for a city council and can't hold onto a planner for more than two years at a time. Any ideas?

38050612
Flag this comment

skippypotpiebaby said on February 21, 2010 at 6:35 PM

I love black berries bushes and salal also horse tails too,

38016546
Flag this comment

readerofstuff said on February 21, 2010 at 11:19 AM

I love the guy in the suit complaining that the homeowner has "no choice". One - if you choose to purchase on the waterfront, you might not get a giant lawn! That is a "choice" right there. Cry me a river that you will not be allowed to have your Round-Up weed killer running down into the public water all summer long. Besides, why can't this guy drive his six (SIX!!) children over to the park in his giant gas-guzzling passenger van, that you know he has, and kick balls around there?

38002002
Flag this comment

sethseven said on February 20, 2010 at 12:54 PM

And considering he built the house the story is about. I've seen it from the water and it isn't big enough to kick a soccer ball around anyway so what's he talking about? He couldn't sell this place and ended up living there himself. maybe he things a little lawn will add to it's resale value?

37964717
Flag this comment

islanderone said on February 20, 2010 at 12:28 PM

I'm farily certain the owner was aware of the NVZ considering he is a realtor and owns the Remax agency on the island.

37963828
Flag this comment

beansmom said on February 20, 2010 at 10:57 AM

This waterfront property appears to have a newly built residence on it. This guy who is bringing the lawsuit against the island didn't know about the NVZ when he bought the place? What about his realtor? Two words Due Diligence

37960418
Flag this comment

morganthomas said on February 20, 2010 at 8:50 AM

Nothing more than a bunch of "do gooder" liberials trying to control your lives.it's your land ,not theirs.Tell'em to stuff it.Their name is not on the deed to the land.

37954594
Flag this comment

mommydearest said on February 19, 2010 at 11:09 PM

Whoa, if people work hard to buy a waterfront home, why should they have so many rules and regs regarding their "yards", etc.?? Many are old Island homes, with old time families still living in them and not everyone that lives on the water is rich. Islanders should be aware of all the garbage that is being passed around, taken away and "strange dealings" at City Hall. I can think of some past mayors and city council members who are "rich" and got even richer ..If people can legally afford their home, pay their property taxes, so be it! I enjoy the waterfront at Fay Bainbridge or my relatives house.

37940566
Flag this comment

mwilson2 said on February 19, 2010 at 8:26 PM

Who are these whinning rich f*ckers? Why do you even cover these simpering blood suckers?

37935643
Flag this comment