Print
Email
Share

Key WA lawmaker wants vote on capital gains tax

by Associated Press

KING5.com

Posted on February 6, 2012 at 7:07 PM

OLYMPIA, Wash. -- The Senate's chief budget writer on Monday proposed a plan that would have voters decide not only on a temporary sales tax increase this year, but also on a permanent capital gains tax that would be dedicated to paying for education for the long term.

Sen. Ed Murray, D-Seattle, told The Associated Press that he doesn't want the bulk of education cuts or cuts to critical care hospitals to be decided by voters, as proposed by Gov. Chris Gregoire in November.

Instead, Murray said that he wants to see Republicans and Democrats work together to maintain those programs, by increasing some business and occupation preferential rates, increasing the cigarette tax, extending the beer tax and reducing the sales tax break for cars purchased from auto dealers, among other things. The sales tax proposal that would go to voters would help backfill other cuts lawmakers might make, and the capital gains tax would address education.

But the revenue votes that Murray wants to take up in the Legislature to prevent putting education cuts on the ballot require a two-thirds vote, which means majority Democrats would need Republican votes, something Murray says he is hopeful for.

Murray said putting education and critical health care on the ballot is a "win or lose scenario."

"We shouldn't take that risk," he said. "We should take care of that problem here."

Murray said he hadn't yet talked to Republicans about his proposal, but he believes they will want to work to reduce cuts that directly affect their districts, like to rural hospitals, instead of leaving it to voters. Murray said that while he's talked to the Democratic caucus, there wasn't yet consensus.

Republican Sen. Joe Zarelli, the Senate GOP's lead on budget issues, expressed skepticism toward Murray's plan.

"I would say it's highly unlikely they would muster two-thirds to do all of the above," he said. "It's solving a problem by raising a bunch of taxes."

Zarelli said that while a legitimate discussion could be had on reviewing tax preferences, or eliminating a first mortgage tax deduction for large national banks as Murray suggests, Republicans want to focus on reforming government before talking about taxes.

But Murray stressed that those actions alone won't solve the state's nearly $1 billion budget crisis, so in addition to sending voters a temporary sales tax increase, as proposed by Gregoire, Murray also wants voters to decide on a capital gains tax. Murray says his proposal would ramp down the amount of that sales tax that would go down as a permanent capital gains tax of 5 percent would start in Jan. 1., 2013.

Capital gains taxes are applied when someone makes a profit off of the sale off of something, like stocks or real estate.

"Cutting alone won't solve the problem long term," Murray said of the need for sending a tax proposal to the voters.

Under Murray's referendum proposal, a half-cent sales tax increase would take effect on July 1, bringing in nearly $500 million to help the current budget. In 2014, the sales tax would decrease to three-tenths of one cent. In 2015, it would decrease again to two-tenths of one cent, and in 2016, it would go away completely. The capital gains tax would be permanent, and dedicated to paying for basic education in the state.

Lawmakers returned to the Capitol on Jan. 9 for the 60-day legislative session, tasked with addressing the projected budget deficit through June 2013.

Gregoire wants a buffer of several hundred million dollars in case the economy underperforms, meaning legislators will have to make about $1.5 billion in cuts or find new revenue. The Democratic governor has also asked the Legislature to send a temporary sales tax to the November ballot to help offset those pending cuts.

Senate Democrats have said they would have a budget proposal ready shortly after the next revenue forecast, which is scheduled for Feb. 16.
 

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 7 of 7

kevinhin said on February 7, 2012 at 3:19 PM

@ltc67 you wrote "And lets be real, how many of us are living on capital gains simply because we don't have to work; and as a result paying no federal income tax?" Tell me how you don't claim capital gains on the Federal Income Tax! Probably don't want to say to keep the IRS away... And to the rest of you who think this is "disposable income", tell that to the laid off corporate employee who has to sell some stock to make ends meet. Tell that to the person who sells his/her house because they can't afford to live there.

81018543
Flag this comment

pixelater said on February 7, 2012 at 2:28 PM

So what you're saying is if someone works hard, saves wisley for their future and spends their already taxed income prudently then the state should get a share of the profits. BULL SHRIMP

81016089
Flag this comment

puddlebubbles said on February 7, 2012 at 2:16 PM

ltc67, You hit the nail on the head. I only hope more people start listening.

81015583
Flag this comment

quidproquote said on February 7, 2012 at 10:44 AM

A capital gains tax is pretty much the best idea possible. It only hits those with disposable income.

81003656
Flag this comment

c8lsonics said on February 6, 2012 at 9:35 PM

Democrats will never solve any fiscal problems. Their ONLY response is to steal more money from the people.

80980754
Flag this comment

ltc67 said on February 6, 2012 at 9:34 PM

This could make me rather unpopular, especially with my family pretty much all being registered Republicans. The capital gains tax is a great idea. It actually does tax those who can most afford it, and it is relatively hard to extend it to where it would hurt lower middle class families. And lets be real, how many of us are living on capital gains simply because we don't have to work; and as a result paying no federal income tax? That said, the Democrats are going to have to make some very tough choices about their "social welfare" programs. The cuts are going to have to be deep and wide. My suggestion for where to start would be welfare for anchor babies, if any part of the family is not a fully naturalized citizen welfare should not be allowed until said anchor baby is 18 years of age. The other issue is education, yes citizens have a right to an education, however that education is generally supplied in English. Ban the interpretters in classrooms!

80980703
Flag this comment

invalid said on February 6, 2012 at 9:26 PM

"Cutting alone won't solve the problem long term," because in a few years we'll want to put in place a bunch of new programs to replace the ones we're cutting so that we can go through this all over again the next time the economy tanks. Gimme a break. The state already takes a chunk of what I get when I sell my house. Now they want more plus taxing gains on my investments? Have Democrats ever met a tax they didn't like?

80980497
Flag this comment