Print
Email
Share

Full-body scanners arrive at Sea-Tac Airport

by JIM FORMAN / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @Jimformanking5

KING5.com

Posted on October 14, 2010 at 9:59 PM

Updated Thursday, Oct 14 at 10:22 PM

Poll:
Will you use the full-body scanners at Sea-Tac Airport?

SEA-TAC AIRPORT - The first of those controversial full-body scanners have landed at Sea-Tac Airport.

Two of the new machines have been installed at the south checkpoint and will be in full use by the end of next week.

They're backscatter x-ray machines that give security screeners an up-close and personal look at what's under your clothes. Everything. And that is what has caused the controversy.

“I'm not fine with it,” one female passenger told us. "It's like invasion of privacy."

But the government says screeners will be off in private rooms. They don't see who they're screening, just the x-ray image. They say the images are destroyed.

At Sea-Tac, travelers will have the choice of bypassing the new machines, opting for the traditional metal detectors.

Some at Sea-Tac are welcoming the extra layer of cutting-edge security.

“If it keeps us safer on the flights, it's worth it,” a male passenger said.

“If it keeps people safer, I’m fine with it,” said a woman who just landed from Boise.

Still one critic told us, “I think I'd probably pick a different lane."

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 15 of 29

tomma206 said on October 15, 2010 at 11:24 PM

They arent as bad as mayor mcginns cycle lanes destroying our streets.They must be stopped!

53913581
Flag this comment

extde said on October 15, 2010 at 7:19 PM

Almost everybody have credit cards. New credit cards have small chip that is able to communicate with terminal distantly (very similar to RFID). So, it is easy to identify you when you passing gate at Starbucks, same thing with these scanners. It is relatively easy to identify you when you passing this scanner. So, scanner may be used as selective weapon - the level of Gamma rays may be adjusted by computer. Anyway this technology may use several scans and radiation level adjustments to get perfect picture - because of very different objects scanned. There is also a myth about scanned images storage - they are precessed by computer, so they already stored in computer memory. And these images should be stored in case of any problems as an evidence. I don't believe these images are not stored anywhere.

53906994
Flag this comment

karnie said on October 15, 2010 at 5:04 PM

Seems to me the government promises lots of things, why should we believe this?

53902364
Flag this comment

portnic said on October 15, 2010 at 3:58 PM

How is it going to make flying safer if the bad guys can opt for a traditional metal detector?

53899861
Flag this comment

spack005 said on October 15, 2010 at 3:54 PM

What "freedoms" are you losing. If one person gets on with some sort of weapon, I losing my freedom to live, and my family is losing their freedom to have a father and husband. I think everyone needs to go through these machines, cause if I was planning on taking over a plane, all I need is a hard plastic knife taped onto the inside of my leg. I have seen "secondary pat down searches". They are pathetic, a recruit in the police academy could do better. I will use these machines everytime I fly in and out of Sea-Tac, and my family will too!

53899724
Flag this comment

nwoisgoingdown said on October 15, 2010 at 3:38 PM

And despite all the controversy... Do any of you guys still think people took over a plane with boxcutters... HAHA. I would have used my luggage bags to stop them.

53899066
Flag this comment

nwoisgoingdown said on October 15, 2010 at 3:16 PM

Most of you guys are in such a naive bubble. There are some benefits to it.. but in the end taking away liberty and freedom. How much of it will we give up before we live in a totalitarianistic world, a police state?????? Cant you guys see the big picture in all of this? The New World Order is setting in, we will increase our stupid ways and give away more and more freedom for 'security'. Wake up people

53898134
Flag this comment

sls41 said on October 15, 2010 at 1:42 PM

mirage I never said Osoma had any thing to do with the scanners I said that the new health care bill can take advantage of the screening while invading our rights to privacy that will make you no safer. Cant you handle a little joke?

53893414
Flag this comment

chuckstr76 said on October 15, 2010 at 12:20 PM

Since flying on an airplane is a privilege and not a god given right, if you don’t like the scans, then find another mode of transportation, no one is forcing you to follow the rules. If it makes flights safer, then I am all for it..

53888026
Flag this comment

christopher_b said on October 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM

I don't mind the extra security, I have nothing to hide.

53883329
Flag this comment

mirage said on October 15, 2010 at 10:43 AM

@sls41 - these scanners were on their way way before Obama and the health care debate. I do love how you manage to turn everything into something against Obama. Sorry look a little closer to home, you have former Bush Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff and an army of former Bush appointees to thank for these. His company The Chertoff Group were the ones touting this solution - so he and his company are rolling in cash because they convinced the public that this is the only solution. He is the middle man between the US government and the company that makes the machines. Look at come of the Chertoff Group board members - Chad Sweet - former CIA, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and Homeland Security, Larry Castro - former NSA, General Michael Hayden - former CIA Director and Nathaniel Fogg - former COO of FEMA. In fact all 11 board members I found listed were all former Bush appointees. I am sure it is all on the up and up of course...

53881538
Flag this comment

juliav said on October 15, 2010 at 10:39 AM

How can these make flights safer if they're optional? Like some terrorist is going to choose the full body scan. In addition to invasion of privacy, what about the health risks?

53881219
Flag this comment

brentallica said on October 15, 2010 at 10:23 AM

If I stick a sign down my pants that says **** ***, will they be able to read it?

53880189
Flag this comment

brentallica said on October 15, 2010 at 10:19 AM

Hey - Check out my wang!! It's smiling!!

53879879
Flag this comment

freemonttroll said on October 15, 2010 at 9:43 AM

Safer? Laf... There was a test done a while ago with these. A guy went through one and they saw that he was carrying a cell phone and a pocket knife, what they failed to see was several pounds of liquid explosives he has on his body... Safer? Yeah, maybe from distracted walking...

53877334
Flag this comment

theperfectweapon said on October 15, 2010 at 9:40 AM

I can picture some small guys stare at a Playboy magazine before going through the scanner.

53877159
Flag this comment

sls41 said on October 15, 2010 at 9:02 AM

“If it keeps us safer on the flights then we should give up all rights ? HELL NO! When will it stop? Do you think giving up all freedom is going to bring you safety? It is apparent that we have to fear our government more then the nut cases. I guess this is part of the obama health care plan for screening for colon cancer when they do the body cavity check. The borders are wide open and the government is not doing the job of protecting us from attack like they should.

53874333
Flag this comment

kayak said on October 15, 2010 at 8:45 AM

King 5 needs to do a story on the health risks of these.

53873331
Flag this comment

freedomfrank said on October 15, 2010 at 8:23 AM

"Do you feel safer now?" just as safe as I felt 30 years ago.

53871764
Flag this comment

scott_bellevue said on October 15, 2010 at 8:17 AM

I won't get in one of those. No way. First they want random drug testing for pilots and people in jobs where safety is an issue. They they want drug testing for just about everyone. Then they scan our houses with infrared scanners looking for pot growers. Then they tap our phones and read our emails at the NSA to keep us safe. Then they start checking the contents of laptops, as if the data on your computer is up for grabs with no warrant. Then we take our shoes off in the airports. Then they simply scan us so they can see us naked. The fourth Amendment to the constitution has been completely eliminated now in order to keep us "safe". Do you feel safer now?

53871464
Flag this comment

scott_bellevue said on October 15, 2010 at 8:06 AM

No, this is just plain wrong. We don't need to be safer. There hasn't been a single incident that warrants this. Even on 9/11 the box cutters were hidden on the plane in advance. This is enough for me to refuse to fly. I won't get in one of those. First they make us take off our shoes, and now we have to pose naked to get on a plane. No. Absolutely not.

53870739
Flag this comment

kbbcoop said on October 15, 2010 at 7:16 AM

muslims already state the scanners are against islam, so there you go. they will refuse to get in them. what a waste of money, scanning little kids and grandmothers.

53867383
Flag this comment

radiationisharm said on October 15, 2010 at 6:47 AM

I hope you all realize the danger behind the levels of radiation emitted by the backscatter technology. University researchers have protested against this technology being used on human bodies, as after a few uses, it could begin to produce harm, especially on infants and pregnant women and elderly people/immunocompromised people such as people who already have health conditions such as cancer or h.i.v. and other immune system deficiencies/defects. I'd rather take a boat to travel to another country and/or be searched the traditional way, with blue gloves by security. I have nothing to hide and I do mind to be harmed by radiation. There's no difference from that and a directed energy weapon. These scanners can cause cancer and all sorts of health problems no one wants, so go out there and do something about this terrible change.

53865001
Flag this comment

freedomfrank said on October 15, 2010 at 5:43 AM

Why do we spend so much money protecting people who fly? Do you realize over 100 people die in traffic accidents every day in America? Why is it less important when someone dies in a car?

53860471
Flag this comment

cmeeverett said on October 15, 2010 at 12:41 AM

I'll take whatever line is faster.

53851706
Flag this comment

matthias said on October 15, 2010 at 12:29 AM

“If it keeps us safer on the flights, it's worth it,” “If it keeps people safer, I’m fine with it,” Full body cavity search will help keep us REAL safe. Wonder if these two peeps are fine with that too.

53851544
Flag this comment

blankingout said on October 14, 2010 at 11:55 PM

I wonder if this scanner company compensated the person who created the Christmas day incident last year that got them the $170m contract at Seatac alone yet?

53850976
Flag this comment

clear2copy said on October 14, 2010 at 10:28 PM

Operated by people that don't even have to have a High School education in order to get their job.."They say the images are destroyed" hahaha , ya..right. You can find them posted on the Internet already..

53848964
Flag this comment

karnie said on October 14, 2010 at 10:08 PM

No..it's just plain wrong.

53848299
Flag this comment