Print
Email
Share

Flood control above Snoqualmie Falls blamed for valley flooding

by CHRIS DANIELS / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @ChrisDaniels5

KING5.com

Posted on January 18, 2011 at 12:02 AM

Updated Tuesday, Jan 18 at 4:51 PM

NEAR CARNATION, Wash. – Five years. Four major floods.
 
For the people who live in the Snoqualmie Valley, it’s getting old really quick.

“Seems like these are getting more frequent and more severe,” says Geary Eppley, who own the Acacia Horse Farm near Carnation. “This is a wakeup call for the valley that something is going on.”
 
Eppley could only canoe in and out of his home Monday night, and says the current flood is just the latest example of something wrong upriver.

He and his fellow homeowners have created the Snoqualmie Valley Preservation Alliance, and are united in their belief that flood control work above Snoqualmie Falls is largely to blame for the increased flooding. They’ve filed a lawsuit against the Army Corps of Engineers and Puget Sound Energy, aimed at stopping the work.

The Army Corps and PSE have been working to redirect some flows and widen the river. They believe it lowers the flood risk near the City of Snoqualmie. 
 
The lawsuit also calls for a comprehensive review of the impact of the work on the valley.
 
“It’s not fair to take the problem upstream and send them downstream,” says Eppley.
 
But PSE says there is no connection between their project and flooding the Snoqualmie Valley.  PSE spokesperson Roger Thompson says the suit “misses the point" and the work has a “negligible impact” on the valley.  PSE Lawyers also say in court documents that the utility “denies the characterization of the complaint.”
 
Army Corps spokesperson Patricia Graesser declined comment on the suit Monday night.
 
 

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 3 of 3

cherryvalleygal said on January 18, 2011 at 12:03 PM

Instead of the flood control above the falls, I believe another reason to be the slow filling in of the river due to silt building up. As the river basin is silting up, the river channel can hold less water...hence the more regular and more severe floods. The same is true of the smaller creeks that the salmon spawn in. Since the farmers out in the valley can't keep the drainage creeks dredged anymore, we've seen the number of salmon spawning in our creeks on our property drop dramatically. The only time I've ever had salmon be able to make it into our creeks to spawn over the past five years is during the big floods...and that number has dropped until this year when I haven't seen a single salmon make it to my three creeks to spawn.

59080857
Flag this comment

chevelle70ss said on January 18, 2011 at 10:12 AM

I have an idea, move.

59073661
Flag this comment

chuckstr76 said on January 18, 2011 at 7:52 AM

My first thought, Your trying to sue someone because it rained and you live in a valley. Hello, you live in a valley, where do you think the rain will go....Physics 101

59065362
Flag this comment