Share this article:
Print

Chilling 911 tapes of Federal Way church shooting

Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

by TONYA MOSLEY / KING5 News

KING5.com

Posted on March 25, 2010 at 3:04 PM

Updated Thursday, Mar 25 at 5:48 PM

FEDERAL WAY, Wash. - It was an emergency call rarely made.

"I flew into a massive fit of rage and shot my wife in a counseling session." says Charles Parsons.

"Ok" says the dispatcher. "Is she conscious?"

"I think she's dead." says Parsons.

42 year old Charles Parsons tells a dispatcher he shot and killed his ex-wife Carol, during a counseling session. The therapist also makes a call to police.

"We had finished a session he pulled out a gun, shot her I think he emptied several shots into her. Oh God."

The call was placed last Wednesday at Calvary Lutheran Church in Federal Way. Police arrived a short time later and arrested Parsons. His wife Carol died a short time later.

"The sense of desperation or hopelessness doesn't have to be turned into actions that are devastating for everyone involved," says Mark Adams, a domestic violence therapist at Wellspring Family Services. Adams teaches his clients to take responsibility and think about the consequences of acting out in anger.

"How many times did you shoot her?" asks the dispatcher on 911 tapes.

"I don't know. I'm laying down on the ground right now so that police can come and arrest me." says Parsons.

Parsons is in jail on $5 million bail. His three children, ages 11, 9 and 5 have lost both their mother and their father. The children are with relatives.

"It really raises the importance I think for all of us on how we treat the people we say we care about most." says Adams. For more infromation on Adams groups "Domestice Violence Intervention" and "Domestic Violence Dads" go to http://www.wellspringfs.org

Share this article:
Print

To add a comment, please register or login.

Leave your comment
1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

HTML is not allowed.

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 10 of 10

janni said on March 28, 2010 at 7:53 PM

Ok, so Tomma. Stick to the story! What has, as you believe, the courts being biased against fathers have to do the 911 tapes of the murderer calling in? Where did you come from? Stick to the story at hand!

40205962
Flag this comment

tomma206 said on March 28, 2010 at 1:41 AM

@CARRIESU27.Stick to the story at hand for once.The courts have always been biased against fathers.Where did you come from?Learn from someone else would be best for you

40167382
Flag this comment

janni said on March 26, 2010 at 6:39 PM

This was a very hateful man. What he has taken from those children is just as bad as the act of killing their mother.Did he hate his own children so much to do this to them?I knew Carol,she was a mother first and foremost,her kids were her life.She tried for years to make the marriage work for the children but it was not to be.Carol was trying to help her exhusband transition after the divorce by including him in counseling.She was more than generous with him regarding the children,wanting them to maintain a relationship with their father.As far as him saying on the 911 tape that he flew into a massive fit of rage and shot her,I think he was already in a rage,had been for years as demonstrated by his abusiveness.As far as I'm concerned,this was premeditated murder.He brought the gun into the church with the intention of murdering Carol there.He is nothing but an abusive, violent, self-centered, bullying murderer. Carol for all her good intentions could not help this control-freak.

40110872
Flag this comment

casca said on March 26, 2010 at 12:24 PM

I have personal knowledge of this tragedy and here are the facts: The husband was a control freak that bullied her for years...think O.J. Simpson. They were divorced for almost 18 months. Her family pressured her to agree to attend the church sponsored counseling sessions...probably in the hopes of a reconciliation. The EX-husband lost his job and was unemployed for quite some time. His EX-wife was working full time and going to school for her nursing degree, in the hope of making a better life for her children and herself. The EX-husband couldn't handle the thought of loosing control. He made a choice to punish his wife, his children, her family, his family and MANY other people that thought alot of his EX-wife and her determination to move on with her life. So, this spineless SOB elected to kill his EX-wife in a church!? Are you kidding me? He kills her and does it in a house of God?! What a real man! He could've gotten a new life and moved on BUT NOOOOOO!

40091496
Flag this comment

joliska said on March 26, 2010 at 11:31 AM

The man had a choice. Either he could shoot his wife, or he could not. He chose to shoot her. His choice, his fault. People have got to start taking responsibility for their choices. You can't say "this person was making me mad, so now I'm going to kill them. Therefore, it is the victim's fault they were killed." You can't do that. Whether the wife was trying to make his life miserable or not, the husband still did not have the right to shoot her. Victim blaming. Society is full of it.

40087541
Flag this comment

drcyclops said on March 26, 2010 at 10:58 AM

dakota is right, having counseling at the point AFTER their divorce, made things a lot worst, a really bad idea, what was the counselor thinking, that's like throwing water into a vat of boiling oil (the guy could have took it out on him). Working at a church means, he most likely wasn't getting any compensation as he was just volunteering. From what I see, the ex-wife was goading her ex, until he snapped, and took it out on her. The bottom line behind her words was like saying: "No matter what, I'm right, and your wrong, no matter what!" it's just putting salt into an open wound, awful. And she definitely had a problem, wanting to get the last word in, no matter what, at least that's what I see here, based on his actions, he most likely wouldn't have shot her, otherwise. And yeah, maybe she had a sincere good intention (I have serious doubts on that, because of what happened). All good intentions seem to end very badly, unfortunately.

40084998
Flag this comment

sounders2010 said on March 25, 2010 at 8:18 PM

Carol was in therapy with her husband because she was hoping it would help him accept the divorce, which is more than a lot of people would do. He wouldn't accept it no matter what and he took it out on her. She was exhausted, she just wanted to find some peace and help him find peace too. She was not trying to take away their kids. But all the therapy in the world would not save her. She was a member of Domestic Violence Awareness and she was scared. We knew her, she was a wonderful person full of life and a smile that could light up the whole room, It was not the therapist's fault, it was not Carol's. There's only one person to blame here, whether he was mentally ill or not, he chose to bring the gun to therapy. You can't say there's not some premeditation there. Now 3 young children have lost both their parents. It's such a tragedy. If you want to help them, you can donate money in Carol Hales Parson's name at any Bank of America.

40045431
Flag this comment

dakotanative said on March 25, 2010 at 6:24 PM

There is something wrong when a divorced couple is in marriage counseling. Obviously the counselor was leading the guy on, making him believe there was still a chance so he would keep spending money on the sessions.

40040598
Flag this comment

marlastewart1 said on March 25, 2010 at 6:07 PM

This may not be popular but we do not do enough for men in situations of emotional and mental pain -- did anyone stop and actually work with Mr. Parsons through the pain of his estrangement and divorce - alone and away from his wife/former wife? Do we do enough for men whose only outlet is aggression and almost a primal response to their position as husband and head of household? Women talk. I know - I am one and a woman who has been in this position - I am equally at fault with my former husband's violent response to my request for a divorce.I spoke to counselors and friends - I never spoke directly to my former husband and never suggested he should seek help SEPARATE from our issues so that he would feel safe with his pain. We are ALL responsible in this society for men who do not feel free to talk and emote about their emotional pain when losing a spouse or partner. We do not provide them with the steps to work thru this pain in a safe environment. I am so sorry for this family.

40039891
Flag this comment

carriesue27 said on March 25, 2010 at 4:29 PM

'bobknows' You have no idea what you're talking about. The Courts are not biased against fathers. I work for an attorney and we have plenty of male clients that get custody of their children. Do you know the circumstances surrounding the situation? Probably not! So to say that he pointed the gun at the right person is absolutely disgusting. The children have lost both their parents.

40035523
Flag this comment