Print
Email
Share

Getting foster kids back with their families proves successful

by TONYA MOSLEY / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @TonyaMosley

KING5.com

Posted on June 24, 2010 at 5:53 PM

SEATTLE - Thirty-four-year-old Brandy Lopez has come a long way.

"I'm proud of who I am today," she said.

Brandy has full custody of her baby daughter, but it wasn't always that way.

"I was addicted to heroin and meth," she said.

Homeless, addicted and in no shape to parent, baby Grace spent the first year of her life in foster care.

"When this all started, I didn't think I deserved to be a parent anymore. Brandy, however, is being honored today because she did what the social workers asked - she got sober, found a place to live and today her 16-month-old baby Grace is back home.

"I felt pride, for the first time in my life I felt pride because they seen the mother and not the addict," said Brandy.

Two other mothers were also granted custody today through the state's reunification program.

"When Child Protective Services removes a child from a parent's custody, our very first goal is to get that child back with that family," said Nancy Roberts-Brown with the organization Catalyst For Kids.

"Before she was born I said I want my daughter's name to be Grace," said Brandy's husband Francisco. "I said by the grace of God she will come home."

Brandy and her husband say believe it or not this is the best thing that could have ever happened to them.

"I know we will be a huge success because of how far we've come."

The state says about 67 percent of children in foster care are reunited with their parents or a guardian.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 10 of 10

wishfulthinking said on June 25, 2010 at 9:09 AM

Notice that the 67% includes "a guardian" in that sentence. . Only a very small percentage of children are placed with able kin as the law mandates to begin with and very few are returned to parents. DSHS is an industry and rarely helps any one. If they come knocking at your door guilty or not you are in for the worst ride of your life. Unless of coarse your child does not fall under the adoptable classification. And the Social worker likes you!

46176438
Flag this comment

msmanners said on June 25, 2010 at 4:13 AM

Gee, who is mom and who is dad? Oh, so confusing.

46149093
Flag this comment

msmanners said on June 25, 2010 at 3:57 AM

This is what happened to my family. So, before they got the care they really needed, two years had gone by. But speaking of YOUR tax dollars, I am not too excited by my social security money being spent on foster care when there are able and willing relatives to care for a child yet they are being screened out - one right after another. The state lies about relative placement statistics and goes for the title IV funds, not caring about who gets hurt in the process. If they really cared about children and the community, they would be placing them with relatives expediently. Now they are adopting out my grandchildren to gay men, and I am very concerned about the safety of my grandson who is now going to be taught that men are supposed to act like girls.

46148524
Flag this comment

msmanners said on June 25, 2010 at 3:50 AM

The timeline that you are referring to doesn't work with the reunification efforts with addicts. Heres why. First, they yank the kids. Next there is the 72 hour shelter care hearing. One to three months later there is a review hearing. At the review hearing they decide what services they are going to send them to. It starts with an assessment which can take two to six weeks. Then the caseworker has to send in paperwork to approve any payments for classes and this can take two or more weeks, although treatment is not usually paid for by the department but by fed dollars. Depending on where they get an assessment and by whom, assessments are geared to go to the lowest possible recommendation. This means that someone who should be in inpatient may find themselves in outpatient. Because they aren't getting the care they really require, they relapse. Then at some point, they may find themselves in inpatient, but by then several months have gone by. Now they are in trouble noncompliance.

46148342
Flag this comment

aziza said on June 24, 2010 at 11:18 PM

I am for reunification, what I'm against is keeping the kids in limbo for years in the system. This happens more often than not, and that is what is detrimental to the kids. The state rarely follows its own time line.

46143653
Flag this comment

seattlentv said on June 24, 2010 at 10:07 PM

Congratulations on your success. You are right she was a true blessing who gave you reason to become the parents she deserves. I really like this story.

46142039
Flag this comment

noexcuses said on June 24, 2010 at 9:50 PM

Yes, I know all to well how important it is for the state to "keep the family together". The state wants what is in the best interest of the parent. Not what is in the best interest of the child. Just yank the child from a stable loving home because the dope head "is clean". Goodness, the child is over a year old and has bonded with the foster parents. I think dope heads need to be sterilized (temp or perm) and if they stay clean for 5 years and prove themselves clean and they can provide for a child (not on my hard earned tax dollars) they can start over. One strike and you are out!

46141487
Flag this comment

msmanners said on June 24, 2010 at 8:06 PM

I question the 67% reunification rate particularly when I know they lie about extended family placement. However, Congrats! I wish it was the story of my family.

46137123
Flag this comment

dkkitt said on June 24, 2010 at 8:05 PM

Please excuse my spelling and if I seem to have an attitude. My prayers are truly with all families who are working hard to get their families back together. It's just strange that in today's society mental illness is seen as a hopeless case when it comes to reunification. It is not hopeless and I have the stories to prove it. Substance abuse even has its own court system. When will they get mental illness courts. Think about it, if there was a court to deal with mental illness issues like drug court we could solve a great many problems. People could be mandated to treatment or face the consequences. Of course not everyone will be sucessful but that is true in society as whole. Imagine if someone commits a crime and uses mental illness as their excuse the could go to a special court that can address specific needs and restrictions to safe guard society. hmmm

46136983
Flag this comment

dkkitt said on June 24, 2010 at 7:20 PM

How wonderful for these families, I wish them all the best. You are among the fortunate few. You had advocates working on your side because of your addiction. How unfortunate for those who don't have substance abuse issues. If you have a case of depression there is "nobody" out there to advocate for you. You lose your child and the only means for treatment you have., without a dependent child you loose the medical that gave you the treatment and medication you need to function. Five years after my granddaughter was stolen from our family, Her mother is finally getting the treatment she needs for her PTSD and depression. Where were the reunifcation advocates then? As far as myself, I have my stolen childdaughter's older sister but that didn't mean a thing. I was just the grandmother and had no rights. Next spring she will graduate and go on to college. My younger granddaughter may never graduate high school much less college, as she was adopted into a culture of subserince.

46134268
Flag this comment