Print
Email
Share

Did U.S. military plant spy among Washington anti-war groups?

by ALLEN SCHAUFFLER / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @schauffKING5 | Follow: @schauffKING5

KING5.com

Posted on January 31, 2011 at 9:33 PM

Updated Monday, Jan 31 at 9:33 PM

JOINT BASE LEWIS-MCCHORD, Wash. -- Did the U.S. military break federal laws by planting an undercover spy among Western Washington anti-war groups? Did local law enforcement accept the volunteer undercover efforts of somebody who just happened to be a civilian employee working in Force Protection at Joint Base Lewis McChord?

Those are two big questions that you may hear asked more often and more loudly in the future as public information requests turn up documents about what that undercover operative reported.
 
Timothy Smith, Chairman of the Tacoma chapter of the Bill of Rights Defense Committee, has obtained documentation from the Tacoma Police Department about the activities of John Towery, the undercover plant who was working under the supervision of a Pierce County Sheriff's detective. Those documents show Towery spent several years infiltrating a variety of local anti-war and anarchist groups, focusing mostly on efforts to prevent U.S. military equipment and convoys from moving through ports in Washington, often Olympia and Aberdeen.

Smith says the fact that he has received the detailed information about the undercover operation shows that personal information about protestors, information about individual relationships and the relationships between various anti-war and anti-government groups has been kept and shared by law enforcement agencies.

He also believes the city of Tacoma has more information on the case than they have given him and he plans to continue pressing them until he has it all.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 5 of 5

drewhendricks said on February 1, 2011 at 4:13 PM

I think it is important for National Security to abide by the laws of the US, the Treaties the US has signed, and the obligations to federal laws designed to limit the power of the military to rule political life in the United States. What the Army (and its employee Towery) did was interfere in the rights of protest (Yes, they did stop protests in some instances) and associate. By destroying the trust people had, you destroy the ability to organize. That is a violaton of the First Amendment which guarantees association.

59847503
Flag this comment

gritz said on February 1, 2011 at 1:46 PM

I might not be popular on this site, but I think it’s important to National Security to know who, what and where people are planning to disrupt the mission of the US military. While they might think that their cause is just, that does not give them the right to illegally deter people’s right to passage. It also does not give them the right to destroy public, private of government property. I am also not sure of the harm the government did, if they did spy. Where you able to protest? Where your rights violated and if so which right? I know it’s easier to hide behind your bandana while you create crimes, but you know I just don’t care.

59839758
Flag this comment

gritz said on February 1, 2011 at 12:26 PM

I might not be popular on this site, but I think it’s important to National Security to know who, what and where people are planning to disrupt the mission of the US military. While they might think that their cause is just, that does not give them the right to illegally deter people’s right to passage. It also does not give them the right to destroy public, private of government property. I am also not sure of the harm the government did, if they did spy. Where you able to protest? Where your rights violated and if so which right? I know it’s easier to hide behind your bandana while you create crimes, but you know I just don’t care.

59835286
Flag this comment

oldguy said on February 1, 2011 at 10:33 AM

People cooperate and people compete. Cooperation has benefits. Competition has benefits. People even cooperate in order to compete. Cooperation requires agreement. Then people compete to get agreement. We call agreement "peace." We call disagreement "war." People make rules for war they cheat on. Deception is used. We call that salesmanship or "democracy." Elsewhere we call it dictatorial. Then there is the “The New World Order” that envisions a world ruled by corporations--or an oligarchy. Presidents like Hoover, Reagan, the Bushes, and their new Supreme court Justice John Roberts promote it. When others do, we call it Communism. We call those of different mind, dissidents. Dissidents argue for freedom. Freedom for some, isn’t for others. When dissidents arise, we spy on them. When discovered, we lie about it. Round and round it goes. Where it stops no one knows. It seldom does. Maybe that's good. The Bible says, "It came to pass." So it is, has, and will be.

59828579
Flag this comment

biggergovnow said on January 31, 2011 at 11:46 PM

Did they? More than likely, they have been doing this type of thing for years. It is done for intelligence gathering, to keep an eye on what the opposition is up to, and most importantly, to help control the oppositon. This is not much different than what the FBI did in Oregon for the tree lighting ceremony. They help create a problem, stop it, then pose as our saviours. I would bet the easiest way to spot a fed in a group opposing the system is to take a hard look at those that suggest violence is the best way to deal with a problem. I am actually kind of surprised to see this come out, though it will likely be buried and fall down the memory wormhole...Remember, the easiest way for the government to take our rights away is when we beg them too...tyranny will always follow.

59807299
Flag this comment