Print
Email
Share

DSHS documents reveal disturbing information about Powell family

by KING 5 News, Associated Press

KING5.com

Posted on February 17, 2012 at 3:17 PM

Updated Friday, Feb 17 at 11:35 PM

SEATTLE -- Hundreds of pages of reports from the Department of Social and Human Services regarding Charlie and Braden Powell reveal details about living conditions inside the Puyallup house they temporarily lived in with their father and grandfather.

Multiple times, counselors and administrators at Carson Elementary notified DSHS, concerned about statements Charlie, 7, made while at school.

In one instance on February 18, 2011, an administrator reported Charlie told a group of kids, "The Mormons killed my brother and my mom."

In June, administrators said Charlie told a little boy he was going to "come to [his] house at night and kill [him]" because he "hated Mormons" and made other similar statements about hating Jews and Christians. The counselor noted this wasn't the first time Charlie made that sort of statement. 

INTERACTIVE: Timeline of entire Powell case

Pierce County deputies raided the Puyallup home of Josh Powell's father, Steven Powell, on August 25. At the time, Steven was living with Josh, Charlie, Braden, Josh's sister Alina and Josh's brother John. DSHS workers noted John had previously been seen both nude and wearing a diaper. In his room, workers said John had a hangman's noose and gallows set up, as well as a poster of a woman with a sword in her genitals protruding out of her stomach.

Around this time, a DSHS agent documented Charlie telling him the best way to bury a bear. Charlie said it included digging a hole, putting the bear in the hole, covering it with rocks, a tree, and then planting raspberries because they would taste the best.

In a September 22 report, DSHS workers comment on the amount of pornography found in Steven Powell's room, noting some of it was child pornography. Workers said Josh Powell "cannot be excluded from being involved" because he works with computers and some of the images are "sophisticated."

The next day, Steven Powell pleaded not guilty to child pornography and voyeurism charges in Pierce County court. During a DSHS interview with Josh Powell that day, Josh said it was likely that his father's obsession with Susan Powell, Josh's missing wife, was likely to come out.

Following the September report, Charlie and Braden, 5, were interviewed separately by DSHS agent, however, neither boy wanted to talk about their family and said everything was fine at home.

During a September 27 supervised visit with Josh Powell, Braden told a social worker he did not want to see his father. After agreeing to the visit, the agent observed Josh Powell telling the boys, "Make sure you tell people how much fun we have every weekend."

The foster parents who took care of Charlie and Braden also provided DSHS with information about what the boys said. They noted Charlie made several statements regarding his hatred for the church, God and Jesus. They said Charlie stated, "Do you know God gave the church to a man in Utah and he is trying to get me, Utah is in the desert and he wants to take me to the desert. That's why we moved here."

Images of cartoon incest found on Josh Powell's computer

Josh Powell had hundreds of images of disturbing cartoon sex and graphic depictions of incest on his home computer, something Utah authorities investigating his wife's disappearance kept private for about two years.

A Washington state psychologist who had previously said Powell's strong parenting skills should allow him to continue supervised visits altered her assessment after reviewing the images, calling them a "great concern" and suggesting a more intense evaluation of the father. That conclusion came just six days before he killed himself and two sons in an explosive house fire two weeks ago.

Many of the approximately 400 images described in the state social services included sexual depictions of popular cartoons, including child-focused characters such as Rugrats, Dennis the Menace and SpongeBob SquarePants. Another 15 images showed 3-D depictions of sex involving parents and their children.

Powell had initially told the psychologist that he visited only pornography sites featuring adults.

"Given the gaps of information about Mr. Powell there seems reason to conclude he may not presently be a stable and appropriate resource for his children," wrote Dr. James Manley in a follow-up report.

Washington officials overseeing the care of Powell's children first got word of the graphic content in November, when a Utah investigator wrote in an email that they were looking to disclose to social workers about 5-6 images recovered in 2009 shortly after Susan Powell's disappearance.

But two months later, social worker Forest Jacobson wrote that the images weren't received until mid-January and told the psychologist "it is now clear there are many more images than initially indicated."

A spokesman for the West Valley City police in Utah did not return a call seeking comment Friday.

KING 5 News crews continues to review the hundreds of pages of documents. More details will be posted throughout the day. Watch KING 5 News at 5 and 6:30 for a complete report on the developments.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 15 of 24

CrichSeattle said on April 5, 2012 at 10:00 AM

Courts rule in favor of the parents so strongly that some children do get hurt and some die. If you wanted those rules to change and children to be taken away based on innuendo and grievances between neighbors, then be careful because child protective services could start coming for your children based upon anonymous tips from people who don't like you. In this case, it does appear that DSHS and law enforcement didn't communicate, and that lack of communication cost the lives of two innocent children, but if the rules change and supervised visitation starts being forced into public venues, the person getting the visitation will have to pay additional money for that. It is hard to entertain and play with young children in many public places, so it's a difficult question. Each case is different, so don't start making judgements that you think will apply to family law matters if you haven't been involved. Let judges decide on a case-by-case basis. That's why they are there.

86524335
Flag this comment

queenanne said on February 21, 2012 at 9:19 AM

padzamp "You" are "insane," and I certainly hope you don't have any "children." Also, you need to learn how to use "quotation marks." Josh Powell forfeited his right to prove his "innocence" by taking the coward's way out, and as much as admitted guilt by doing so.

81808202
Flag this comment

padzamp865522293 said on February 19, 2012 at 5:36 PM

What a bunch of Bull manure. DSHS is just trying to get people to find excuses to "steal other people's kids from them". There was never any indications that anybody, including "Their Father" ever did anything to sexually assault, or molest those children. This is just a blatant and inexcusable assault on this mans rights,and privacy , even after he was "harassed" so much by "The State" that "he finally took his life , and his own children's lives". So far all I've seen is "lies,and innuendo". If there was any proof that this man actually did anything wrong , then "Let's see the proof". I thought a person was "innocent until proven guilty by a jury of his peers". This is just "character assassination" because "DSHS/ CPS harassed this man to death". If you can't prove otherwise,then just "leave them alone". I have personally watched CPS destroy many peoples innocent lives. This is an "unconstitutional Dept. and should be abolished". "They steal children".

81660511
Flag this comment

musicfreak said on February 18, 2012 at 4:49 PM

Chuck and Judy don't blame the police, or DSHS or anyone BUT Josh Powell. JOSH is the only one at fault for those boys being dead. Both states did what they felt was best with the information they had.

81590394
Flag this comment

eadnx said on February 18, 2012 at 12:53 PM

I do hope that out of all this the requirement that in these cases where there is suspicion and doubt on the part of DSHS while they're waiting to review information relevant to a child's care by a parent, that visitations are not only supervised, but out in public as well. Then, hindsight says the boys would still be alive and the truth of Josh's psycho-sexual review would have been brought to light.

81577844
Flag this comment

grannydub said on February 18, 2012 at 12:00 PM

There WAS sufficient evidence in the hands of Utah authorities to restrict Josh Powell's access to his children, if not to charge him for murdering his wife! Incompetence and indifference, starting and ending with the Utah authorities, is to blame for the death of Charlie and Braden. Washington DSHS could only act on information they actually had at their disposal. The fault here in this State is when some of this information about Josh Powell was known and they allowed visitation to continue. Visitation should have been suspended completely until Powell completed ALL of the Court ordered evaluations, etc.....but even Powell knew he would never attempt to have the evaluations...because he knew he was one sick, demented individual. Apparently much of the Powell family has mental/emotional issues. These two boys did NOT have to die!

81576039
Flag this comment

thetruth01 said on February 18, 2012 at 10:46 AM

"killws my mommy and my brother...........?" why do I have a horrible sinking feeling that susan was pregnant when she went missing?????????????

81573857
Flag this comment

lhasamom said on February 18, 2012 at 10:38 AM

Josh Powell fooled the State Psychologist into thinking he had good parental skills, until she got the information from Utah. Then she altered her assesment only after she got the information, Wow I feel sorry for the people under care.

81573562
Flag this comment

curious2know1 said on February 18, 2012 at 9:24 AM

This is all very sad. I do have a concern about the lady that was supervising the visits. Does'nt it seem there should have been a man in charge since the kids were going to there father's house? Especially under the circumstances, I would think an elderly lady that can't keep up with the kids just would not be a good fit. I think having a man to bring them to the house maybe would of made a difference, maybe Josh would'nt of felt he could railroad the situation like he did. Just a thought. Brenda in Orting

81571113
Flag this comment

agarmy said on February 18, 2012 at 7:03 AM

Well, thats DSHS for you. I agree with mrcrowley though. Too many kids are put into the system, and put into the wrong hands. When they find something disturbing, they neglect to act on it. Too much red tape, they think too much about the "parents rights" but fail to uphold the childrens rights and wellbeing. Sad that this has to happen. If you aren't stable, be responsible and don't breed.

81566522
Flag this comment

andriam said on February 17, 2012 at 10:25 PM

WHY DIDNT ANYONE PROTECT THESE CHILDREN OVER THE RIGHTS OF JOSH?

81558944
Flag this comment

tprop said on February 17, 2012 at 9:57 PM

this is useful and productive.

81558402
Flag this comment

mazze6011 said on February 17, 2012 at 9:04 PM

@ldandrd1 I agree with most of what you said, but the West Valley Police Dept. didn't withhold the information a Judge In Utah sealed the documents, so the information was not seen by DSHS or law enforcment in Washington....

81556777
Flag this comment

ldandrd1 said on February 17, 2012 at 8:44 PM

Granted DSHS could have handled things better, but what about the police department withholding information they retrieved from Josh's computer 2 years ago? They just released that info in January! DSHS didnt even have time to react/respond to that yet!! I think we need to focus on the police department a little closer here guys... Was someone in the department trying to protect Josh? ..and why? Where was the concern for those boys?? Why wasnt the police confidentially informing DSHS about their discovery? Oh yea..they cant serve and protect until after the crime happens...wth??

81556092
Flag this comment

realitychk said on February 17, 2012 at 8:12 PM

@mrcrowley, LOL!

81554909
Flag this comment

lin1945 said on February 17, 2012 at 7:30 PM

This article and various reports are very disturbing . . . no so much that the boys said what they did but that nothing was done in time to save them. It is obvious to me, an untrained person, that there were many questions and concerns that would dictate Josh Powell should not be raising the boys. I also feel he should not have had visitation and certainly not supervised visitation in a private space unprotected for the boys and supervisor. Many people have let down the two boys. I hope their deaths were not in vain and law enforcement and DSHS, attorneys, judges, 911 operators and more learn something from this case and no other child's safety is overlooked. Number one is protect the child. Period.

81553304
Flag this comment

kmcbride said on February 17, 2012 at 7:29 PM

There is soo much that needs to be done to fix our government and its outlyiing programs, like DSHS, that anyone who even truely wants to try to fix it, won't know where to begin. However blame for cases like this can't be completely set at the feet of DSHS. They have restrictive policies and regulations to follow, not to mention being overloaded, with less than half the people they need to do thing's correctly. There are simply too many problems and too few high ranking politicions who actually want to fix them.

81553232
Flag this comment

mrcrowley said on February 17, 2012 at 6:51 PM

The problem is not with DSHS. The problem is the human reproductive system in the hands of the majority of people I meet.

81551842
Flag this comment

gizmo1 said on February 17, 2012 at 5:23 PM

I am literally sick to my stomach after reading this. Just when I think this story couldn't get any worse...I agree with Daytrader...

81548671
Flag this comment

Daytrader said on February 17, 2012 at 4:37 PM

This tragic story has so many lose ends from people and departments involved it has become disgusting.

81546952
Flag this comment

mrussell94269899 said on February 17, 2012 at 4:34 PM

WOW! Once again DSHS has REALLY Screwed up! I have NO words...So Sad!

81546856
Flag this comment

gavmitri said on February 17, 2012 at 4:22 PM

How many other children are out there with disturbing statements in their files that should probably be looked into further...will it ever happen...or will more children's lives be lost?

81546418
Flag this comment

fwkc63 said on February 17, 2012 at 3:41 PM

UNBELIEVABLE DSHS!!!

81544651
Flag this comment

mickeygirl03 said on February 17, 2012 at 3:26 PM

A little late now don't you think? The boys are gone! This should have been brought up a long time ago! Maybe the boys would still be alive!

81543967
Flag this comment