Print
Email
Share

Builder agrees to $2.4M settlement with 850 Redmond Ridge homeowners

by LINDA BRILL / KING 5 News

KING5.com

Posted on January 13, 2012 at 6:44 PM

Updated Friday, Jan 13 at 6:56 PM

Shea Homes last week settled a class-action lawsuit brought by 850 homeowners in the company's Trilogy development in Redmond Ridge, part of unincorporated King County just east of the Redmond Watershed Preserve.

Shea will pay $2.4 million total to settle claims that poor construction caused mold problems at more than half the homes in the Trilogy development.

The homeowners' suit claimed that Shea "failed ... by not properly cleaning and priming the wood on the eaves and soffits ... before applying the first coat of paint. And, by using damp, wet, contaminated or unfit wood."

Retired doctor Peter Wasserman paid $650,000 for his new Trilogy home in 2005. Mold "started to show up two to three years after the house was constructed," he said.

Another Trilogy owner, Loren Lewis, bought his home five years ago for $600,000. Within a few years, mold started growing under the roof.

Lewis said he "did everything I could to make it look better, but it's right back the way it was, mold."

When Wasserman complained, Shea told him the mold was his fault, due to poor maintanance.

"I dont think they had alot of experience building up here in the Northwest," Wasserman said. "They're out of Arizona."

Under the settlement, the homeowners will get about $3,000 each to make the needed repairs.

A Shea vice president had no comment when contacted by KING 5. The company is currently building more homes in Redmond Ridge.
 

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 12 of 12

zaxxon7469 said on January 16, 2012 at 9:46 PM

Hey Redmond, I would have to say this would be great time to get up to RedRidg and do some snooping. plenty of oportuinties to hand out fines. I worked for a home builder that was out of Duvall long time ago, the houses built then were 250K and great quaility. our painter added the proper fungicide, and we used properly treated wood. The 600K house now is being built with the same corner cutting a econo builder would do. I think the home owners have fraud law suit they could go for. If I dumped 600K on a house and started to have mold issues right away, I would go thru old product lititerure and see what they advertised and see if they did it. I also would do an air sampling and see if they even followed SMACNA codes for the HVAC. check for moldy insulation, and underflooring. Law requires proper "drying-in" of the interior before any work can be done to close up the living space.

79978832
Flag this comment

slappywag said on January 15, 2012 at 1:20 AM

Someone at King 5 can't do math. If the suit is $2.4 million / 850 = ~$2823.53. Minus lawyer fees = not much left over.

79898558
Flag this comment

jackwong said on January 15, 2012 at 12:54 AM

Amen, Wellcraft19 That's why I only deal with Old Houses. Plus, the land of old houses it sits on usually has lots of expansion opportunities. Such as unfinished basements and garages to make ADUs an DADUs. But it takes a lot of expertise to know if its a deal or not.

79898246
Flag this comment

wellcraft19 said on January 14, 2012 at 7:48 PM

Building inspections do nothing for this "type" of quality (or lack thereof). An inspector will never check the wood or the material before it is being primed or painted. They check, in best cases, structural stuff and mechanical systems since those are "easy". Anyone looking to buy a newly built home in the PNW should know fully well that the structure is built when it is raining, all wood (studs, subfloors, etc) gets soaked and that there is not a builder out there that put the roof on "early' in the process. Never understood why not start with actually putting roofing underlayment (and also roofing material before you start working on the interior. But like others have said, we get the quality we are willing (or not) to pay for. That's why I prefer older houses. A structure that's been around for 50 years, likely have good materials (no OSB or press board), real plywood, slow grown studs, and the defects are at this age known - and easily corrected/repaired.

79891294
Flag this comment

banditrider said on January 14, 2012 at 2:20 PM

Finally, usually these builders set up LLC's for individual projects and empty the corp. when finished so there is no one or nothing to be liable for shoddy construction.

79881223
Flag this comment

btvsrcks said on January 14, 2012 at 1:56 PM

I think old school is missing his space bar.. LOL

79880393
Flag this comment

bigdaddyof4 said on January 14, 2012 at 7:49 AM

What happened to the building inspectors is my question too? Why do we have codes and inspectors again?

79868463
Flag this comment

vonnieglen said on January 13, 2012 at 10:00 PM

The problem is not the wood, the prep work, lack of inspections, or the Shea company. The problem is regulations that prevent paint companies from adding effective fungicides to their products these days. Our house is in the middle of a bunch of trees and mold is a constant battle. Most of the time spraying with a bleach solution and then rinsing takes care of the problem if you don't let it get out of hand like these people did.

79858428
Flag this comment

cntbelieveit2395 said on January 13, 2012 at 9:44 PM

Poor reporting again King 5. The homeowners will receive about $1800 each after the standard 1/3 the class action lawyers will take (amounts to $800,000). The repairs and mold removal will cost about 3 times that much, so score one for the blood sucking lawyers...

79858068
Flag this comment

think said on January 13, 2012 at 8:38 PM

$3,000? That's chump-change and not going to do squat to fix the types of problems in these large homes. At least the wealth screwed the wealthy this time, instead of the poor or middle-class taking it in the you-know-what.

79856223
Flag this comment

java230 said on January 13, 2012 at 8:14 PM

home value is part land costs and part building costs (which ties into alot of things like oil costs and lumber costs), the average well built 3bed/2bath (2000sqft) home costs about $175-$200 thousand to build. Add real-estate value, lets say a 1/4 acre lot costs about a $200 thousand on the east side and about $50 in the cheaper areas like Kent, Auburn, Pile-up (haha), Tacoma, Sea-Tac. (ignoring the values in this article since they are highly inflated during the 2007 boom) So honestly if you purchased a new house for less then $375 thousand on the Eastside side/ Seattle Area and $225 in the poor areas, you really need to consider how they built the home so cheap and dont cry later. You get what you pay for. Good home, has good material, that costs good money. i dont feel bad for any of them-

79855553
Flag this comment

oldschoolmx said on January 13, 2012 at 7:43 PM

QUESTION,where&what-happened-to-the-building-inspector-??????THANKS

79854511
Flag this comment