Share this article:
Print

Billions on line in Washington school elections

Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

by DEBORAH FELDMAN / KING 5 News

Posted on February 9, 2010 at 8:08 AM

Updated Tuesday, Feb 9 at 12:48 PM

******

OLYMPIA, Wash. - Billions of dollars are on the line today as voters consider school levies on their local ballots.

A total of 165 school districts are asking voters to approve more than $4.6 billion in property taxes for maintenance and operation levies. And 32 districts have capital project levies worth $835 million. Also, four districts with $2.9 million with school bus levies, and 11 districts with $859 million with bond issues.

Clearly, a lot of money is at stake for taxpayers, and a lot of important programs for students.

Traditionally, Washington state voters tend to pass school levies, which often can amount to 20 percent of a district budget. But this year, it's a lot of money at a time when many families are feeling the pinch.

Some school districts have already come up with contingency plans if their levy is not passed, but they're not pretty.

In Puyallup, the districts levy failure proposal involves cutting sports teams, after school activities, and student transportation, not to mention more than 100 jobs.

"This is dramatic. This is substantial, and this is reality for us," said Diana Seeley, Puyallup School Board President.

Students and parents have tried to get the word out in districts across Western Washington, but some voters insist they are not willing to loosen their purse strings.

"We spend 50 percent or more of our state budget already on schools. Tax levies are in excess of that. At some point people say, 'This is too much gold-plating,'" said Ken Morse, T.E.A. party organizer.

Those ballots must be either postmarked or dropped in official drop boxes by day's end.

The key, say people on both sides of issue, is to make sure that voters make their voices heard by getting their ballots in on time. 'In on time' means ballots must be either postmarked by today or dropped in one of your local drop boxes. And be warned, due to budget cuts, there are fewer this year than usual.
 

Share this article:
Print

To add a comment, please register or login.

Leave your comment
1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

HTML is not allowed.

bobknows said on February 9, 2010 at 9:47 AM

Are the people really stupid enough to vote for billions of new taxes for the NEA to dumb down our youth? Aren't we Taxed Enough Already?

aziza said on February 9, 2010 at 10:26 AM

I am really disappointed with the lack of promotion of these levies. Bobknows? This is a renewal of already existing taxes. Voting NO will not put more money in your pocket and voting YES won't take anymore out. This is not something the NEA or the WEA are going to profit from- these are operations and maintenance levies. Are you so ignorant to believe your comment?

ramigo said on February 9, 2010 at 10:37 AM

I proudly voted against it! Enough taxes. Enough! It seems to me that in order to fix $2.6 billion dollar deficit our state government aims to pass any bill that involves new fees and/or taxes. ENOUGH!!!

ggd11thacr said on February 9, 2010 at 11:05 AM

OK, for all of you that are complaining about more taxes!!! LISTEN UP the operating levies the School Districts are asking for are NOT NEW TAXES, these are renewal of existing taxes for the basic operation of the schools, and in some cases such as Steilacoom Historical School District #1 it actually is lowering the one that has been in place for the last four years. The School Districts switched to asking every four years instead of every year as a means of saving tax dollars. Support your School District and the children that will be our leaders in just a few short years.

nativeteacher said on February 9, 2010 at 11:08 AM

bobknows, no, no Bob doesn't.

yessir said on February 9, 2010 at 11:19 AM

I'm 100% in support of our school levies being renewed. As Aztra wisely noted, many of the levies are not "new" taxes, but rather continuation of existing programs. For example, King County's Medic 1 program runs on a levy.... Should people vote "no" they don't halt "new" taxes... they eliminate "existing" funding and thereby eliminate a program. That IS what will happen to schools if levies fail. Programs will be eliminated.

firefoxtwo said on February 9, 2010 at 11:22 AM

I vote against any operations levey in Puyallup. The school district has no accountability, and their methods don't work. Down with Senior Boards! Get rid of Diana Seeley!

tacwilster said on February 9, 2010 at 11:43 AM

I am voting NO, if our state government can be so stupid as to spend money on a tunnel, they can just find a way to pay for schools, it would be so easy if they just took the billions of dollars for the tunnel and used it on schools! NO MORE TAXES

nativeteacher said on February 9, 2010 at 11:45 AM

bobknows, how does the NEA, which is a national organization, “dumb” down the children in our state? Should you not be lambasting WEA?

gritz said on February 9, 2010 at 11:49 AM

Looks to me, the School Board is getting caught up in its own bait and switch. By changing the Levy from every four years to every year, you gambled that the public would not say no. I mean; it for the kids, right? Everyone wants their kids to have the best education. Problem is it just seems like we just voted for your levy and now we have to vote again. Year after year the schools need more money with the same results. Low WASL scores, Students watch movies in class (Bring it on - PG -13 Steilacoom HS), Sport programs that require students be out late on school days, no food provided. We have to pay extra for labs and certain classes, 1/2 day Wednesdays, Bus fee, activity fees. With all the technology, one would think that teaching has gotten easier. Computer generated grading and automated programmed curriculum, but it’s the other way around. Teachers want more for doing less.

nativeteacher said on February 9, 2010 at 12:55 PM

gritz, Your statement "Teachers want more for doing less,” tells me you do not what you are talking about. More and more is being asked of us and they are giving us less. I base my statement on first hand experience, what are you basing yours on?

gritz said on February 9, 2010 at 2:04 PM

nativeteacher I am basing it on : 1)Married to a educator 2) When I went to school back in the seventies, class size was usally 30 students. 3) We had to read Stienbeck and Eliot and Shakespere. 4) Class started at eight and went till four. 5) There was no ADD or ADHD 6) Teacher would stay after school, now they beat you out the door headed for the Schooner. 7) There was no copier or computers or calculators, teachers worked harder than and you know it. My daughter is a Jr. in high school and has never read a classic american authored book. My son is reading Dean Koontz, in class.

norwegiandave said on February 9, 2010 at 3:26 PM

gritz, you must have skipped English class... spell check could help you. Sounds like you went to a private school in 1962... did you have to walk up snowy hills just to make it to school? Teachers spend their day with the children of parents like you... oh the misery. I voted YES, and hope we continue to fund education despite curmudgeons like you.

yea_yeager said on February 9, 2010 at 4:43 PM

VOTE YES FOR SCHOOL LEVIES!

bobknows said on February 9, 2010 at 7:44 PM

I hope the people had enough sense to vote NO on taxes. Its time to let taxes expire and DON"T VOTE FOR NEW TAXES! WEA, NEA, by whatever alphabet soup the unions use, its time to STOP them from taking our money to dumb down our youth. We are Taxed Enough Already!

nativeteacher said on February 9, 2010 at 9:03 PM

gritz, Why is it that people like you always claim to be married to an educator? And why, if your education was so superior, are you bearly (like my spelling, I did for you) literate? I also love the argument that teachers work so few hours. How would you know if you are working ten hour days? You couldn’t possibly see us leaving the house so late and slinking home so early. Unfortunately the quality of our instruction has suffered under No Child Left Behind, a poorly thought out and tragically implemented fiasco. There are some 100 plus ways to become a failing school and only one way to become a successful one. Did you know that if every student passes the test du-jour, a school will still be labeled FAILING if they have more than ONE PERCENT unexcused absences? So how do we attempt to combat this? We spend huge amounts of time teaching how to take a test so we won’t have a throng of pseudo intellectual ultra conservative screaming for public money for private school.

duuuhhh said on February 9, 2010 at 10:29 PM

The same ignorant voters that put Gov. Quagmire and Obama in office think voting "NO" saves them money.