Print
Email
Share

Ferry system unveils action plan

Ferry system unveils action plan

Ferry system unveils action plan

by SUSANNAH FRAME / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @SFrameK5

KING5.com

Posted on November 17, 2010 at 5:07 PM

Updated Wednesday, Nov 17 at 9:31 PM

SEATTLE -- Washington State Ferries (WSF) delivered a 102-page action plan to the Governor Wednesday in an attempt to improve the system, which the KING 5 Investigators have found is riddled with inefficiencies and wasteful spending.

The action plan is the Washington State Ferries' (WSF) response to 36 recommendations given in September by an expert panel assembled from ferry systems across the country. The panel, made up of members from the Passenger Vessel Association (PVA), of which WSF is a member, concluded WSF is a “well-run industry leader.”

However, they also identified areas of improvement.

Recommendation: Manager aboard each boat

WSF says it agrees with most recommendations, including making the Captain on each run a manager, as opposed to the current system where Captains are employees represented by the union Masters Mates & Pilots. WSF says making this change would hopefully lead to more accountability with the crew, including cutting down on overtime and making sure the sailings are on time. Currently, no one in management is aboard the vessels.

The WSDOT Ferries Division action plan states:  ”Washington State Ferries (WSF) believes the PVA Panel's recommendation that the vessel Master (Captain) act in the capacity of management's representative is the most important recommendation given to the Governor. Making the Captain the management representative on the vessel would allow WSF to develop a set of management and performance objectives associated with the operation of the vessel that the Captain would be responsible for and held accountable for meeting.”

But making this switch won't be automatic. Current union contracts do not allow for a change in status for Captains to move into management positions. Becoming managers means Captains would give up their long-time benefit of earning overtime.

Recommendation: Allow national bidding to build new ferries

The PVA also recommended WSF get in line with what every other ferry system in the country does: allow nation-wide bidding on contracts to build new ferries. Current Washington State Law requires ferries be built in-state.

Last week, the KING 5 Investigators uncovered that WSF’s newest vessel, the MV Chetzemoka, is the most expensive boat ever built in the country. The total cost came to $80.1 million. Using the industry standard of calculating costs by how many cars a ferry can carry, the Chetzemoka cost $1.2 million per car slot. That’s more than double the industry average of $500,000 per car slot.

WSF's response? Further study is needed.

According to the Action Plan, “WSF will evaluate this further in advance of the next vessel procurement contracting opportunity, which is currently expected to be in about 10 years.

While WSF appreciates the logic behind this recommendation, it believes a change in policy at this time is unnecessary. They state: "The current new construction projects (64 and 144 car vessels) are under contract with Todd Shipyards. The 64 car vessels are already under construction, and cannot be changed. Construction of the 144 car vessels has not begun, but the contract for the 144‐car vessels would require a termination of the contract, new legislation, and a subsequent national rebid. Given the costs, time delays, and possible legal implications of terminating this contract and rebidding the vessels, WSF is not considering bidding these vessels nationwide."

WSF has identified more than $3 billion of unfunded capital projects over the next 20 years; most of it coming from the need to replace vessels, with no money to get the job done.

Over the last eight months, KING 5 has produced 15 stories in an ongoing investigation “Waste on the Water.” The series has detailed millions of dollars of wasted taxpayer dollars and a lack of accountability at WSF.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 4 of 4

raincentral said on December 5, 2010 at 10:36 PM

Thanks you King5 for always giving me only selected facts. Now i can make my decision based on what you what me to know!

56864233
Flag this comment

paulharvey said on November 18, 2010 at 2:57 PM

If you make the captain a manager you will drive a big wedge between him and his crew, including his chief mate who he must rely heavily on for the safe navigation of the boat. You also dump a heap of administrative duties on him while the vessel is running when his only focus should be on the operation of the vessel. There is a reason it has been this way it is for so long. Look for the great safety record at WSF to go right out the window.

55991684
Flag this comment

prestolog said on November 18, 2010 at 9:51 AM

The reason the boat was so expensive is that it was designed and built by politicians (no small wonder it leans to the left). The MkII's are a fine example of employee input, and were not "design and build" boats. The engineers and people that operate the vessels had a hand in the design, albeit not large enough. They are a huge success. Personally, I would not name a boat after one that had mysteriously sunk.

55970764
Flag this comment

sailsman said on November 17, 2010 at 9:41 PM

Ah yes the ol' "requires further study" strikes again. Why don't they investigate the money that would be saved if every thing didn't "require further study"? If a “well-run industry leader” garners a list of 36 recommendations from a panel of "experts", what kinds of recommended areas of improvement would one that is not a “well-run industry leader” receive? Paying more than twice the going rate per car slot makes no sense at all. If WSF is a “well-run industry leader ", " how do you "get in line with what every other ferry system in the country does" Someone must be in front of the line. And to think that the taxpayers paid that exorbitant amount of money for a boat that was already designed? I think maybe the list of recommendations is not long enough.

55942734
Flag this comment