Print
Email
Share

Container trucks near Port of Seattle most dangerous in the state

by CHRIS INGALLS / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @cjingalls

KING5.com

Posted on October 27, 2011 at 10:30 PM

Updated Friday, Oct 28 at 10:36 AM

"I was praying to myself, ‘I hope this is nothing. I hope this is nothing.’”

Those were Bob Kentner’s thoughts when he saw something flying through the air as he zoomed down Interstate 90.

“All of a sudden this thing crashed through my windshield,” said Kentner. “It happened so fast I didn’t know it was coming.”

He still has the 14-pound hunk of jagged metal that flew into his car last month.

"Had it been three or four more inches to the left or right I could have had my head decapitated," said Kentner.

The Washington State Patrol determined the metal came from a truck traveling ahead of Kentner. Part of its braking system collapsed, dropping pieces of metal on the freeway. 

The truck is one of thousands of container haulers on roads every day. Container haulers are short-haul trucks that carry shipping containers between Western Washington shipping and rail ports and warehouses.

Numerous safety violations

A KING 5 investigation reveals safety violations are a chronic problem for trucks working in and around the Port of Seattle.  The problems are so serious officers are pulling many trucks out-of-service, an official term that means they can’t go back on the road until they are fixed.
State records show law officers pulled 13 percent of trucks across Washington out-of-service after inspections this year.

But at the Port of Seattle this year the rate was more than twice as high.   32 percent of container haulers were taken out-of-service, one out of every three inspected.

State Trooper Christopher Hooper is part of a new WSP task force that’s been inspecting container haulers for the past several months.

KING 5 asked him what he does when he sees a container truck out on the road.

“I change lanes. I get away from it,” said Hooper.

During recent random inspections it only took minutes for Hooper to demonstrate why.

His team quickly found a container hauler with a flat tire, one with no brake lights, and another with a window and headlight that were held together with household duct tape.

"It looks like it's holding the fiber glass together, like he hit something and it's all broken up under there," said Hooper as he poked at the tape holding together the front end of the offending truck.

The statistics get even more disturbing when specially trained commercial vehicle inspection officers dig deeper. They also perform Level 1 inspections, a detailed evaluation of the vehicle, driver and load.

Through a public records request the KING 5 Investigators identified more than 200 Level 1 inspections performed on container haulers around the Port of Seattle this year. To view these inspections and violations click here.

Officers put 58 percent of those trucks, more than half, out-of-service following Level 1 inspections.

Many of the trucks have more than one violation. For example, one truck pulled over earlier this month had a brake that was out of adjustment and five tires with little to no tread.

“I believe it’s safe, that’s why it’s on the road,” the truck’s driver/owner told KING 5. He called himself “K-9” and wouldn’t reveal his actual name.  His truck was pulled out-of-service five weeks ago.  He said he spent two thousand dollars on repairs. 

He was upset when an officer told him his truck was still too dangerous for the road.  “That's crazy. I've seen other pieces of crap on the road way more dangerous than this," said “K-9”.

Hauling containers is a scrappy business.

The drivers, who often own their trucks, are the day laborers of the trucking industry. Shipping companies pay them as little as 46 dollars per load.

"We just don't make the money we used to,” said Forrest MaCoy as a trooper pulled his vehicle out-of-service.   “I'm still working for a rate I made close to ten years ago."

"I'm a hard working trucker,” said “K-9”. “Overworked, underpaid.  We do what we got to do."

But Bob Kentner, who’s grateful he was not seriously injured by truck debris, said there’s a much higher price for being unsafe.

“This could happen to anyone as it happened to me. Someone will get hurt," said Kentner.

Truck inspections have historically been handled by the Seattle Department of Transportation which reduced the size of its inspection team in the past year partly due to budget cutbacks. Earlier this year, the Washington State Patrol stepped in and launched a special task force to target container trucks at Western Washington ports.

Up Next: Our investigation continues – who is tracking the trucks?

Have a comment?  We want to hear from you.  Click here, like us on Facebook and let us know what you think.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 15 of 36

Molly-Chase said on November 15, 2011 at 8:15 AM

Seattle city government is never going to get their priorities straight. Here we are with truck parts flying off and killing people on our roads, and they sit fussing about plastic bags and road diets. Well, what can you expect with a voter turnout of less than 30%?

76947588
Flag this comment

comiccon2010 said on November 14, 2011 at 7:13 PM

alot of port haulers do go above the speed limit. if they hired more cve officers there would be no deficet

76925169
Flag this comment

AlkiDweller said on October 31, 2011 at 7:39 AM

@monroe527, Not according to SDOT. About a year ago I had a conversation with one of the Seattle officers about the state patrol pulling over a commercial vehicle near one of the terminals. He told me that they don't have jurisdiction in the city. And it said in the article that the state was involved only at the invitation of the city. @lsmith5870400119, The reason they're not getting good wages is because container freight is traditionally the lowest paying freight for anything moving by truck. It's that way everywhere in the country. @anticap, Just like Canadian trucks, any Mexican truck operating in this country must abide by our regulations when operating in this country.

76103709
Flag this comment

mytruckmylibert said on October 31, 2011 at 12:08 AM

Monroe527@ i guss you don't understand the distinction b/n a highway truckers and short hauler trucker who are currently being misleabeled and abused . I guss you need help to kick the i... out of you . In case it help, Please refer to Seattle times on its Sep 15 edition "Port short-haulers struggle to make living".

76094391
Flag this comment

vffrwm said on October 30, 2011 at 7:08 AM

Novel idea. How about enforcing the law. I know, thats a huge step but just maybe in this case it would be worth it as it could save lives. If they know of the problem why not fix the problem instead of talking about the problem.

76069351
Flag this comment

anticap said on October 29, 2011 at 4:35 PM

Anybody see a pattern here? Look at the names on the sides of the containers being hauled. These are the only people making any money here while the squeeze play is on for the little guy trying to make a living. Between government trade policies and the big corporations that think only about money we are getting our lunch handed to us. And people wonder what all those "hippies" are so upset about occupying downtown.

76054657
Flag this comment

monroe527 said on October 29, 2011 at 4:07 PM

@ mytruckmyliberty- where do see a civil rights issue? Also the truck on the highway is a can hauler that comes and goes in the port. How do you not see the link? I see the writing on the wall. Your a bleeding right wing individual.

76054029
Flag this comment

anticap said on October 29, 2011 at 4:02 PM

I guess if America is now allowing unregulated Mexican trucks into the country, it would be somewhat hypocritical to put too much regulation on container trucks. Just another example of the downhill slide of our great country, the working person once again bearing the brunt of poor government/business policy.. Make sure you have a good attorney handy, should you survive a wreck with one of these death traps.

76053896
Flag this comment

denkoko said on October 29, 2011 at 3:36 PM

As far as cut back inthe funding to inspect these trucks, youcan thank the repudlicans for that. As far as the owner/operators go...IF IT AIN`T PAYIN ENOUGH....GO INTO A SAFER JOB, WITH A SAFER TRUCK !!!!

76053324
Flag this comment

mytruckmylibert said on October 29, 2011 at 1:06 PM

A misguided reporting. You failed to link the highway incident to any of the yard trucks you documented . These trucks you showed being inspected don't drive out more than two miles radiouse. They are drayage drivers b/n port of seattle and the two raills UpRR and BNSF. Lately these drivers are profiled by DOT and state patrol. They are badly under paid and can't afford maintainance. They pay insuranse up to $600a month, diesel $4.50 a gallon, truck tires $ 300 each, tonnage $160 a month, oil change is $280, and other maintianance labour is $85/h plus parts. Like every one else they have to raise family, pay business related tax and on and on. THere is a compaign going on to force them out of business by naling them with every bad truck accident in SEattle. For me it is a civil right issue in the making. Please stop potraying them as public hazards. Infact they are under paid and unprotected servants trying to live the American dream which i think is not there any more.

76049507
Flag this comment

wickeddriver said on October 29, 2011 at 11:58 AM

First off, it was said that the driver get as little as $46 a load. However, most loads pay far more. Also, if a driver is hauling between the port and the rail head, or delivering a load locally, he can haul as many as 8 of 10 loads a day. If a driver is hauling 8 loads a day, that computes to $368 a day, using around $100 a day in fuel, leaving $268 a day or $1340 a week. I use to drive, owned my own truck and made as much as $120,000 a year. I didn't work hard, long hours, just worked steady. I did keep my truck up, but there were times when I should have shut down to fix something, but I waited until the weekend. The moral to this is, the driver should be held responsible for his truck, period. But most of the driver on the port today can't even speak English, or very little English. It's not deregulation where the problem is, it's the state taking the bull by the horn and getting some of these bad drivers off the road.

76047594
Flag this comment

iowaboy said on October 29, 2011 at 9:33 AM

Now I know what it was that came skidding down the road at me a few weeks ago near Gorst. I couldn't help but hit it, and it scarred up my front bumper cover. I couldn't see where it came from, but suspected a cement truck ahead had lost part of its chute, but i recognized the piece from the news article on channel 5 last night. I'm sure glad that baby didn't come up and go through my windshield!!!!!!!!!!

76043349
Flag this comment

monroe527 said on October 29, 2011 at 9:23 AM

@AlkiDweller- The state has jurisdiction any where in the state. Why do you think their working down there in the first place.

76042993
Flag this comment

postnsons said on October 28, 2011 at 10:47 PM

This is the downside of trucking deregulation. Many of these truckers do not know how much it costs to operate. The shippers will not increase rates and the first place a trucker starts to skimp is maintenance. $46.00 for a shipment is ridiculous. Truckers are insane to accept these kind of rates, but they feel they have to keep "moving ". Defective equipment and red tagged equipment will continue to occur with cheaper rates. Bear in mind the Federal Way scales, north and south, are seldom open which is another reason for a reduction in truck inspections. Make shippers pay higher rates, and you will have safer highways.

76030921
Flag this comment

LztCA said on October 28, 2011 at 9:22 PM

Lezcano Trucking is not on this list of violators-I highly recommend them. Trucks are legal, compliant and operated by experienced drivers only. Give them a try..Serving both Ports daily.

76029594
Flag this comment

mthom1234 said on October 28, 2011 at 8:40 PM

In February of this year I was driving north on I5 with my wife and 2 kids in the car and we were struck by a piece of a truck that was owned by a Canadian company with witnesses that stopped and a police report all state that we were not at fault and the company denies liability. Our car was totaled and there insurance refuses to pay for it. It being a Canadian company insured by ICBC they havent even responded to our lawyers requests. I have a feeling with that we will be out the cost of our car and there is nothing I can do about it! I am so frustrated that I want to give up on it but Im not going to! I tried getting Jesse with it with no response but I hope the investigators can help in some way!

76028684
Flag this comment

lsmith5870400119 said on October 28, 2011 at 8:30 PM

The reason they are not getting good wages is that the longshoreman are getting more than their fair share.

76028396
Flag this comment

808in206 said on October 28, 2011 at 4:26 PM

Not only are these trucks in bad shape but the driving skills of these drivers leaves something to be desired. When they exit the port and merge onto E. Marginal Way from the west to get to the other container yard on the east, they think putting on their blinkers gives them the right of way. Even if THEY come upon you and THEY want over, you better move; THEY are coming over into your lane even if THEY haven't totally cleared passing you car. Guess they think being as big as they are that you have no choice but to move out of their way...NOT!!!

76021502
Flag this comment

MTappert said on October 28, 2011 at 3:26 PM

@AlkiDweller you are absolutely correct in regards to you comments regarding the Clean Truck Programs. Pacific Freight Express Inc meets all current requirements for both Seattle and Tacoma Ports "Clean Truck Programs", and we also qualify for "Smart Way" Certification.

76019464
Flag this comment

AlkiDweller said on October 28, 2011 at 3:13 PM

@dakotanative... The commercial vehicle division of the Seattle Department of Transportation is responsible for commercial truck inspections and according to them, the state has no jurisdiction in the city unless it's on the highway. If you look for the white SUV's with SDOT on the door, those are the guys that deal with commercial vehicles.

76019092
Flag this comment

AlkiDweller said on October 28, 2011 at 3:05 PM

To those of you that think the port isn't doing anything about the pollution, last year they started banning any trucks manufactured prior to 1994. In 2015 that goes to 2007. The Port of Tacoma is doing something similar.

76018848
Flag this comment

MTappert said on October 28, 2011 at 2:23 PM

Not all local Seattle Container Drayage Companies are the same. Here at Pacific Freight Express Inc, we are proud to operate well above local safety standards to provide the best service possible, with only 1 out of service violation, and over 20 trucks running the ports daily. Feel free to check us out on the web for more information on our fleet of 2006 and newer International and Freightliner trucks that we use for every sort of intermodal, flatbed, and dry van needs.

76017348
Flag this comment

cmmnsenselost said on October 28, 2011 at 2:18 PM

The only safe way to drive around trucks is to get away from them. Move over and stay right to let them pass by, or speed up a little and pass them. But Do not just drive next to one of them, and don't play 'citizen police' and try to slow them down by camping in the middle lanes of traffic. Do you really want to risk that truck not stopping in time due to some mechanical issue if something happens? Regardless of liability or responsibility, it's your life.

76017144
Flag this comment

foaks9 said on October 28, 2011 at 2:10 PM

The Port has some leverage here, if only they stepped up to the plate. They can impose requirements that would support safer practices, fair wages, and a better environment for all. Talk to the Port about their stake in this.

76016832
Flag this comment

mellybelly323 said on October 28, 2011 at 12:56 PM

If you have your hazmat & tanker endorsements, then sure, Williston is great. We have a friend who couldn't keep his family fed in the log truck business so he packed them up and moved to ND. They are now living in a 5th wheel (monthly payment for that) and paying almost $900/month for lot rent. And paying the mortgage on their house here. And keeping up with the repairs on his truck. They're the lucky ones who can manage it all. However, I don't think your average can hauler even has a hazmat or tanker endorsement. And since most of what's being hauled out there is oil, hazmat & tanker endorsements are a must have. All you really have to do is study and take the test - it doesn't cost much. However, if you're already sacrificing repairs on your truck to feed, clothe and shelter your family, I doubt you have the money for the background check and fingerprinting that you have to pay for. Not to mention the time off you'd have to take to sit down at the DOL while you do it.

76013439
Flag this comment

thatsjarrod1 said on October 28, 2011 at 12:45 PM

K9 should definitely NOT be the spokesman for the state trucking industry.

76012904
Flag this comment

dakotanative said on October 28, 2011 at 11:45 AM

Why dog on the port? If the truckers refuse to work for a low wage, they will have to raise the pay. Taco bell. They pay minimum wage because they can. Go to Williston, ND, and you can't find an entry level position paying less than $15. Yet the minimum wage is far lower out there. Wal-Mart has employees from Texas transfering to their store for the money. Any of these truckers can go out there and start at $20 an hour. And they don't even need to fix or drive their own truck.

76009969
Flag this comment

digiwave said on October 28, 2011 at 11:34 AM

And it will never change, probably only get worse.

76009344
Flag this comment

segzdbdoom said on October 28, 2011 at 11:33 AM

We need to look at the conditions the drivers are having to work. They are at themercy of the trucking companies to call them for a load that only pays what the trucking company decides to pay. The trucking company expects the driver to pay for gas, keep up maintenance and insurance on the truck. They work as many as 12 hours a day and bring home only about $28,000-$30,000 a year. With these costs of gas they are left with the decision to bring milk home to there families or buy gas, get a tire, fix a fender. If they don't have the money to fix the trucks, then no wonder the trucks are polluting the air. These drivers don't have money to keep buying updated trucks to decrease pollution. Where is the government involvment in this? Why does the Port Commissioner not take responsibility for solving this with new policies that insure safe trucks, less pollution to our close by neighborhoods like SouthPark and Georgetown.

76009292
Flag this comment

klondiko said on October 28, 2011 at 10:36 AM

The diesel exhaust these junkers are belching out due to lousy maintenance is bad enough. Port of Tacoma is at least as bad. They are good at sneaking around scales also.

76005834
Flag this comment

mellybelly323 said on October 28, 2011 at 10:14 AM

Do you ever wonder why you get cut off by container haulers constantly? Why they drive recklessly on the road? It's because they're desperate to drop their load and grab another so they can make money... And they're not making that much to begin with. The trucking industry took a pretty big hit when the economy took a swim in the toilet. And when you're only making a percentage of your load - well, it's not very much at all. Add that to hugely inflated gas prices. You do the math. I'm not justifying the actions of these drivers. And I'm not saying that ALL can haulers drive like crazy people. What I am saying is that unless there is some drastic payscale reform for these drivers, they're going to continue to neglect their trucks and continue to drive like nuts in order to get as many loads in a day as possible. Make it manditory that these guys make an hourly wage instead of a percent of their load. I bet then we'll see trucks in better repair and drivers able feed their families.

76004292
Flag this comment

hondaxr650 said on October 28, 2011 at 7:59 AM

I think it's time we had inspections on all vehicles, like many other states have. I'm a mechanic at a dealership and some of the things I see are downright scary. I worked on a van last week that had steering tie rod that was so worn and loose that it was about ready to come apart and the customer didn't want it fixed. Not the kind of vehicle I want travelling on the same roads as my family.

75996669
Flag this comment

dakotanative said on October 28, 2011 at 7:21 AM

Seattle is not responsible for truck inspections. The WSP is. The safety program is good, but they can be a little crazy. One brake out of adjustment on an 18 wheeler? Duct tape holding a window? Unless it is the windshield, and it is really holding it in place, no big deal. Maybe they should shift a little time to the commercial driver training folks in Tacoma. That is crash waiting to happen (in my opinion). Red lights? Optional. Speed limit? As long s you don't exceed the limit by more than 15, it is ok.

75994719
Flag this comment

vffrwm said on October 28, 2011 at 6:18 AM

Looks like again the state is letting it's citizens down. I wonder how many people will have to die before they do something about it.

75991231
Flag this comment

chuckstr76 said on October 28, 2011 at 6:13 AM

How about we do safety checks on some of the car and pickups traveling our roads, then see how that turns out. Am thinking its going to be about the same as the container trucks.

75990929
Flag this comment

shattah206 said on October 27, 2011 at 11:02 PM

Seattle doesn't care about making sure commerical vehicles are safe. It's where they chose to cut staff. But hey, they added a Deputy Director and a bunch of strategic advisors . . . whatever those are. And don't forget the mayor's 95K bicycle buddy

75982852
Flag this comment