Share this article:
Print

Investigators: Report confirms strange practices at King County Morgue

Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

by LINDA BYRON / KING 5 News

Posted on February 1, 2010 at 7:48 PM

Updated Monday, Feb 1 at 8:39 PM

******

SEATTLE - The Medical Examiner’s Office processes crime scenes and investigates unexplained deaths in King County. But it’s what was going on inside the office that prompted an investigation after a whistleblower stepped forward in 2007.

Robinette Struckel worked as a forensic autopsy technician at the King County Medical Examiner’s Office (KCMEO) between 2001 and 2007. She says during that time she witnessed lax procedures, unprofessional conduct and improper handling of skeletal remains, tissue samples and hazardous waste.

"It was difficult to come forward and I came forward to address the insufficient oversight at the Medical Examiner’s Office, to protect public health safety and the environment, and to hopefully facilitate change at the Medical Examiner’s Office,” Struckel said.

One of the practices that concerned Struckel involved her boss, Chief Medical Examiner, Richard Harruff. 
Harruff was personally paying employees to donate semen for use in the lab. Harruff would leave a $20 bill in a box labeled "My Anonymous Specimen" inside the morgue cooler for anyone who wanted to leave a semen sample. The samples were used as controls in lab analysis.

"It, again, is not proper science," Struckel said. "I felt that his authority was abused; he was abusing his authority."

The King County Ombudsman’s Office investigated the practice and determined that it was voluntary, that no employees were pressured to donate semen. But the Ombudsman’s report said the practice "appeared to be inappropriate and could have been misinterpreted." The Chief Medical Examiner stopped paying employees for semen samples after the KING 5 Investigators reported it was happening in 2007 and asked if it was appropriate.

Altogether, the King County Ombudsman’s Office investigated seven allegations of wrongdoing. It found only one rose to the level of “improper governmental action,” and that was the dumping of formalin, which contains formaldehyde, down the drain in the autopsy suite. The KCMEO uses formalin to preserve human body tissue for autopsy.  Because it contains formaldehyde, formalin, is classified as dangerous waste and is regulated by the King County Code, state law and federal law.

"The formalin should have been poured into a fifty-five gallon drum and that drum would have been picked up by Clean Harbors and it would have been disposed of legally," said Struckel.

Dr. Harruff wouldn’t talk to us about the report. But the Manager of Prevention for the Seattle King County Health Department, which oversees the Medical Examiner’s Office, did answer our questions.

Gareth Johnson said he is disappointed with the Ombudsman’s report and disagrees with its findings.

"That (dumping formalin) was never an approved method of disposing of formalin in the MEO (Medical Examiner’s Office) and it was a method that employees were never instructed to use. And in fact we made costly provisions for that formalin to be disposed of properly," Johnson said.

Johnson says the Health Department’s internal review found that the only person improperly dumping formaldehyde was Struckel, the whistleblower. But the Ombudsman's report concludes two staff members did it between 2001 and 2007.

And a former Medical Investigator told the Ombudsman’s Office that when he worked in the autopsy suite, he and others exclusively dumped brain formalin down the drain between 1999 and 2003. 

The Ombudsman’s report says that the KCMEO has made significant changes since 2007, including developing a written procedure, conducting staff training and introducing the use of a formaldehyde neutralizing agent that makes formaldehyde safe for direct disposal to the sewer system.

As for the semen samples, Dr. Harruff now buys them from a medical supply company.

Click here to read complete Ombudsman's report.

Share this article:
Print

To add a comment, please register or login.

Leave your comment
1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

HTML is not allowed.

factoid said on February 1, 2010 at 9:36 PM

Well at least their not selling brains. Oh wait, they did that too. I wonder if you can request to be taken elsewhere before you die. What other types of behavior do we not know about.

yogibear said on February 1, 2010 at 10:41 PM

People are dying to get into this place

summersunshine69 said on February 2, 2010 at 5:14 AM

Get ri of him

cseattle said on February 2, 2010 at 6:02 AM

Dear "gatitaminina", Please refrain from referring to people as "dirty lesbians." Your post was extremely homophobic, disrespectful, and off-topic. Thank you. cseattle

someotherguy said on February 2, 2010 at 8:46 AM

Robinette Struckel sounds like a she needs to try harder to get along with others and not expect the world to change for her when she doesn't like something. I've worked with enough people to recognize a "whistleblower" from a discruntled employee with an ax to grind. I be willing to bet that she isn't happy at her new job either.

dberg35136495792 said on February 2, 2010 at 12:54 PM

Lets recap the recent events from our beloved Medical Examiner (KCMEO). They lost a body from their morgue because a manager wasn't doing his job then tried to cover it up. They promoted Supervisors who lied about their qualifications on their applications. They paid $150,000.00 to a woman because they sexually harassed her. They got caught selling brains (which the supreme court ruled unanimously that they shouldn't do). They got caught buying semen from employees for "lab purposes". No other lab in America does this. They lost multiple records for ldead people but then by some miracle they found them again and lo and behold, missing persons were accounted for. This is just a few of the things this Medical Examiner has been caught doing. None of it would have come to light if it weren't for "whistleblowers". Amazing how our health department never finds that KCMEO is at fault even after facts support that they are. I for one think the entire staff should be fired.

sara41 said on February 2, 2010 at 2:07 PM

Ugh!!, it's hard to be a whistleblower, you become the bad-guy and are accused of being disgruntled, even though what you are reporting is TRUE. It reminds me of when I worked for City of Seattle - they applied for funds in a budget to use for one account but then would use those funds for other projects. When they were "given" box seat tickets at Key Arena they lied and said it was OK. The Director seemed to think if she approved of something that made it okay, WRONG. When you are a new employee it doesn't take long before you see what's going on, the question becomes are you going to tell?

thewholetruth said on February 2, 2010 at 3:56 PM

Let's not forget that a year ago a King County Death Investigator was fired for stealing illegal and prescription drugs from the autopsy suite inside the ME's office and had been abusing them while investigating homicides for six years even though this whistleblower brought up protocol concerns regarding drug disposal and storage for that very reason...employees stealing. Because of her coming forward, at least you know that when you take your dog or kids down to the beach, they won't come out growing a third eye.

support said on February 2, 2010 at 6:36 PM

I think what she did is great. The medical examiner isn't going to come forward and his cronies sure as heck wont if they want to keep their jobs. Between the stealing and the employees who are taking drugs/evidence I'm fed up with the whole mess. Why does the Health Department keep this guy on or his obviously incompenent managers for that matter? I thought we had a county council and a board of health to oversaeee these places.

pscottsea said on February 2, 2010 at 10:55 PM

Dating all the way back to 2005 there has been reporting from KIRO television news, The Weekly and others about the corruption surrounding the culture of death in King County government: http://www.pscottcummins.com/blog/2005/04/time-for-your-voice-on-king-county.html http://www.pscottcummins.com/blog/2005/04/weeklys-rick-anderson-scandal-nothing.html http://www.pscottcummins.com/blog/2005/04/same-practices-as-king-countys-brings.html http://www.pscottcummins.com/blog/2005/04/king-county-signed-contract-to-profit.html http://www.pscottcummins.com/blog/2005/04/coroner-profits-without-consent-from.html

conspiracy said on February 3, 2010 at 10:29 AM

Their Office Manager needs to learn that it takes more than a CSI lunchbox and de-coder ring to do that job. He has no formal training in either discipline yet he remains. Why does the health department think that someone with no experience or training with conducting investigations, handling crime scenes, or performing lab work, can run this department? The chain of command in the yearly reports clearly show that he runs the investigations and autopsy departments but he has no formal training in either. Mr. Johnson isn't very credible when he goes public and says he doesn't believe the report (which took 2 years to complete). It's obvious who has more credibility and it's the whistleblower on this issue.

1lincoln25 said on February 3, 2010 at 1:03 PM

Gosh, it's hard to know where to start. Linda, I watched your report and then read the Ombudsman's report. It sounds to me like the Ombudsman didn't find much merit in any of the complaints, and the one that did raise some concern; your informant was the prime offender. Then even with something as serious as pouring formalin down the drain, what did they do? They fixed the problem and didn't bother with trying to fix blame, what would the point be. As for the control samples of semen, the practice at the Medical Examiner's Office might be unusual, but whatever lab you order your samples from does the same, someone gets, a cup, some privacy and a payment. It might be a bit odd, but at the end of the day the only difference is the middleman is cut out. As for the quality of the science, one could argue that having an anonymous, but if need be identifiable cohort of donors is a better practice. Linda, maybe you should click on that link and read and report with an impartial eye.

conspiracy said on February 3, 2010 at 2:43 PM

1lincoln25 : Two points you make are noteworthy and require a response. The head of the Health Department said that the whistleblower was the only person who dumped formalin down the drain. The Ombudsman (not as biased as the Health Dept. Director) found 7 people who dumped formalin. I doubt the Ombudsman spoke to as many people as they could have or that number would have been much higher. I believe the whistleblower. You also appear to feel that it is alright for the ME to buy sperm from his employees. Here's a news flash, it's inappropriate and not in line with industry standards. The price for comparison samples of semen are minimal at best and there is no reason for the ME to create his own. It only adds to the notion that he's doctoring the results on criminal cases and it isn't done at any other medical lab that deals with criminal evidence. The Medical Examiner behaved unethically and improperly AGAIN and we taxpayers will be stuck with the bill.

1lincoln25 said on February 3, 2010 at 3:42 PM

Conspiracy: Of course Ms Struckel wasn't the only one pouring formalin down the drain, the larger point is that appeared this practice seems to have been corrected well before anyone did any whistleblowing. So what was the "whistleblower's" point with this issue? As for the semen samples, It's not the norm, but that doesn't make it wrong. It seems to me that some people have some rather unscientific issues with some bodily fluids; if these were buccal swabs instead of semen samples I doubt anyone would care. Bottom line I respect the judgement of the Chief Medical Examiner on what's best in these regards. As for who manages the office I can only assume that the Health Department has selected these individuals for their skills in non-operational areas, as they say "we all bring something different to the party". I sincerely hope that everyone can have some peace and productivity now that this report is complete.

conspiracy said on February 3, 2010 at 8:06 PM

I have to respectfully disagree with 1lincoln25. You seem to take the attitude of "no harm no foul". If I pour a can of anti-freeze down the drain at home I'd get fined and threatened with jail time. How is it that trained professionals can do it and nobody says a word? As for everyone bringing something to the party, that might be correct in some fields but not crime scene investigations. Good crime scene work takes formal training and supervised on the job training. I've investigated thousands (yes, thousands) of crime scenes and I know this to be true. I researched some past articles about this medical examiners office and I'm surprised at reports that have come out about this office. Between selling brains without consent to a staff member stealing drugs, I think that's a pretty expensive learning curve the office manager is on. High quality, professional investigations take formal training. Makes me wonder about our medical examiner.

pragmatic2 said on February 4, 2010 at 12:16 AM

Wow, Linda Byron, I am under*^%^ingwhelmed! You got your whistleblower as the prime suspect in the only complaint that had any merit. Investigative FAIL.

1lincoln25 said on February 4, 2010 at 8:09 AM

Conspiracy: In regard to no harm no foul, I doubt the DOE would have mounted a case against an already mitigated discharge, I suppose they would have logged the incident in some fashion, warned the Office, and maybe done some monitoring. At the end of the day, the Office recognized the problem and corrected it. I'm not sure what to make of the CSI lunch box and decoder ring as it relates to the Office management. We are talking about the Medical Examiners Office aren't we. If so they aren't a "Crime Lab", nor do they deploy CSI's to crime scenes. They do from what I've heard have a very skilled group of investigative and technical staff who have a very similar skill set to the CSI's and other forensic professionals. As to the decoder ring, I've searched the County's web site and I can't find a covert section in the Health Department that would have need for such an encryption device. Maybe you're mad at the wrong people.

conspiracy said on February 4, 2010 at 8:58 AM

Unfortunately Loncoln that's incorrect. I'm not even certain that the health department ever notified the DEQ that there was a complaint regarding them for dumping hazardous wastes illegally. I ask, what does the DOE (Department of Energy) have to do with this matter? If you are referring to an environmental agency, I'd voice the same concerns. If KCMEO is playing above board, where is the environmental agency report? As for them being a crime lab, they are performing functions like a crime lab (testing sperm) and gathering crucial evidence used in criminal prosecutions. The office management obviously has a deficiency in ethics (can't tell when selling organs is wrong) and in securing evidence their office is entrusted with. This is why a KCMEO investigator stole drugs for years and why a body disappeared from their cooler. As for being a "skilled group", the depositions in a previous lawsuit paint another picture. The health dept. should be more careful with taxpayer $.

rangemaster said on February 4, 2010 at 12:13 PM

Good job Linda! Some of us would like to know what our appointed officials are up to. I tend to think that former employees are usually the only ones willing to tell the truth Pragmatic.

1lincoln25 said on February 4, 2010 at 12:34 PM

Conspiracy: Sorry for the error, but it appears you knew I meant the agency responsible for water quality with DOE. As for their knowledge of the practice, since a news crew showed up and asked one of their representatives about Struckel's allegations, I guess you'd have to say the were aware. Characterizing the ME's relationship with the Stanley Foundation as "selling brains", is inaccurate and seems intent on creating an image of someone in a dark alley with a trench coat and a brain in a bag. As for the investigator you so enjoy mentioning, his actions (the missing drugs) represented an unforgivable breach of the public's trust. That said, it's my understanding that he was an exceptional employee in all other regards. All posturing aside I think it's fair to say there are times when no manager can see these things coming. For those of us who are human you make mistakes and/or observations, you learn from them and you move on.

rangemaster said on February 4, 2010 at 1:59 PM

You mean the DEQ? Also, I thing people in trenchcoats in dark alleys with brains is probably right on the money. I didn't see anything in their actions that was ethical nor, according to the WA supreme court , was it legal. I'm interested to see what that's going to cost us taxpayers.

1lincoln25 said on February 4, 2010 at 2:17 PM

Rangemaster: Do your self and the rest of the world a favor, let go of the past and move on.

rangemaster said on February 4, 2010 at 3:11 PM

Don't get cranky Lincoln1. I'm just saying that we should hold those people accountable who break the law or violate ethical standards. I also believe that government should hire skilled employees to do the people's work. Simply saying we "will look forward" is a fairly lame response to a real problem that was raised. I like the Puget Sound and I don't think we should dump untreated chemicals in it. I believe most of the people in here would agree with me. Don't get mad if we disagree with one another.

1lincoln25 said on February 4, 2010 at 3:36 PM

I'm not in the least cranky, and like I our waters to be pure as well. It just seems that with this issue in particular one of those "unskilled" employees recognized a problem, addressed it with management in an appropriate manner, and with the assistance of the same management you and others seem intent on bashing, solved it, and nothing in any of the reportage or investigation support the conclusion that there was a cover-up. I truly wish you well, and hope you find peace with these issues.

conspiracy said on February 4, 2010 at 3:43 PM

You make some very good points Rangemaster.