Print
Email
Share

Investigators: Senate bill would give relatives more rights in child welfare cases

by SUSANNAH FRAME / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @SFrameK5

KING5.com

Posted on January 21, 2010 at 10:59 PM

Updated Friday, Jan 22 at 6:55 AM

OLYMPIA, Wash. - A series of stories by the KING 5 Investigators is leading to potential changes in state law, giving relatives more rights in child welfare cases.

The "Alexis Stuth Bill" was heard before a senate sub-committee in Olympia Thursday. It stems from a three-year battle between the state and an Enumclaw couple over their granddaughter.

"I think it's huge," said AnneMarie Stuth as she and husband Doug walked into the state Capitol with little Alexis in tow. It was a family nearly broken apart forever by the system.

"We were going to lose her forever, never see her again. It was the end of the line," said Doug.

The bill would give relatives who care for a child the right to be heard in court with an attorney if the state takes the child away from them in favor of foster care -- exactly what happened in the Stuths' case.

"Family is all you have. That is the one thing that's a constant. It never changes. You always love them and they're always there and I don't think somebody should have the right to take that from anybody, especially a little one," said AnneMarie.

When Alexis was a toddler and a judge was deciding where she should live, the Stuths were criticized in court by state workers. They were accused of lying, making trouble and being unfit to take care of the grandchild they'd raised since birth.

They had to sit there and take it. Relatives have no legal standing to speak up and defend themselves.

"It was two years of sitting up at night. A lot of money. Tens of thousands of dollars. Not being able to be heard in a court. Made out to look like the worst people in the world," said Doug.

The KING 5 Investigators first exposed the Stuths' case in 2008. Alexis had been taken away and in foster care for nearly two years. They were hopeless and beaten down. We continued to show how the state and a judge didn't follow the law by giving priority to relatives. Then, in a sudden shift, the family was re-united one year ago. The Stuths formally adopted Alexis last summer.

The Stuths are hoping this landmark legislation will make a lasting change for children like Alexis in Washington state.

"I'm really optimistic. I'm really glad it's up in front of the Senate and I pray that it passes so people in the future won't have to go through what we have," said Doug.

At the end of the hearing, the committee chairman had encouraging words for the Stuths. He said, so far, there was no official opposition to the proposal and that he didn't see any roadblocks to moving the Alexis Stuth Bill a step closer to becoming law.

Print
Email
Share

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 6 of 6

sara41 said on January 27, 2010 at 10:00 PM

Alexis Stuth, the beautiful little girl FINALLY (after hundreds of thousands of dollars later) returned to her grandparents. What about the people that don't have the money to fight for their grandchildren, or children, or a niece or nephew? I don't know how the Stuth's carried on when they kept getting turned down/ denied by Judges, DSHS, etc. I would have been a basket case. It broke my heart when Alexis said on TV to her Grandfather, "I missed you". They were trying so hard to get her but she kept getting returned to foster care. I'm thankful nothing awful happened to her at foster care, as does happen to some.

36509042
Flag this comment

sara41 said on January 27, 2010 at 9:53 PM

UGH! This can be good in some cases and bad in others. I don't think it's good for Poca to be with family, but on the other hand, I'm overjoyed that the little blond reported on sometime back is FINALLY with her Grandparents. It's a hard thing to decide, and I just hate it when children end up dead after being returned to birth parent(s). The children are young and need protection and returning them sometimes means beatings, burnings, starvation. It makes me think of SIrita Sotelo, Eli Creekmore and the many others caught in the nightmare. Mango - you sound as stupid as your screen name. Since you obviously have the internet look up some of these children's cases. You will find as I listed above children starved by Daddy's girlfriend, or beat to death by Daddy's girlfriend after the child was returned to him, or the three babies returned to their alcoholic Mom, two were found dead and one barely alive.

36508862
Flag this comment

mango said on January 23, 2010 at 7:48 AM

Who in their right mind would think sending a child to a foster family versus staying with the family is the best thing for the child? This nothing more than a bunch of government agencies justifying their useless jobs.

36195867
Flag this comment

izzybella said on January 22, 2010 at 6:03 PM

I hope this legislative session will change the lives of the children that are in foster care. Someone needs to care and put the childrens needs first.

36171944
Flag this comment

mochamia said on January 22, 2010 at 10:12 AM

I appreciate the fact the KING 5 has still got investigative reporters. The biggest fear we should all have is that with the dieing of newspapers, we will no longer have reporters that investigate 'anything!' We have toooo many reporters(tv and internet) that are just there to entertain us-they don't think about fact vs fiction and will make up what they want or think they might like to have happening or suits their political beliefs! SUSANNAH FRAME thank you for delving into this situation and hopefully there will be legislation to address this issue!

36142602
Flag this comment

lovingfitfather said on January 22, 2010 at 8:13 AM

More baloney from the participants in the "Child Protection Rackets." A Government sanctioned crime ring.

36133217
Flag this comment

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?

Register Now

Member Benefits

Link your account to your Twitter or Facebook account for easier login!

Link your account to your Facebook profile Link your account to your Twitter profile

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

* - Indicates required field

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

Connecting to

You may need to allow pop up window for this step of registration

Just one more step:

Please take a moment to review the available e-mail newsletters has to offer. Place a checkbox next to the newsletters you wish to subscribe to.

Welcome.

Thank you for becoming a member of KING5.com. You now have full access to the best local coverage and late breaking news from KING5.com. Soon you will be redirected to the page you were seeking, and a confirmation email will be delivered to you.

You will need to respond to the confirmation e-mail for your account to be activated.

KING5.com is dedicated to bringing you exceptional news and outstanding information services, all while personalizing it to your liking. We're sure you'll enjoy being a KING5.com member! If you need assistance, please contact us.