Print
Email
Share

Forensics engineer joins campaign to free Amanda Knox

by LINDA BYRON / KING 5 News

Posted on November 24, 2010 at 8:17 PM

SEATTLE - With Amanda Knox’s appeal now underway in Perugia, Italy, a grassroots campaign is ramping up here in the U.S. aimed at changing public perception about her case.

Retired forensics engineer Ron Hendry recently joined the cause. Hendry told KING 5 that he feels so strongly about Knox’s innocence, he flew to Seattle from Texas, where he lives, to explain his analysis of the case in an interview.

Hendry said he was able to obtain actual photos of the murder scene at the cottage in Perugia, Italy and all of the evidence points to a lone killer.
 
According to Hendry, the pictures don’t support the prosecution’s theory that Amanda Knox, her boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito and an Ivory Coast drifter named Rudy Guede, killed Kercher in a drug-fueled sex game.
 
“She (Kercher) had to be restrained by the person who killed her,” Hendry says.This contradicts what prosecutors told the jury — that Sollecito held down Kercher while Guede tried to sexually assault her and Knox cut her throat because the British girl resisted.
 
“Two people were involved,” Hendry said. “It was a life and death struggle at the end and the killer was a street fighter-type person who gained control.”
 
Kercher’s bedroom was small. Hendry said the open space is hardly bigger than a queen-sized bed and if there were four people in the room engaged in a physical struggle, they would have sustained injuries and they would have left their DNA all over the room.
 
Hendry said it was Rudy Guede who left a bloody footprint in the room, along with his DNA on the victim and on her belongings.   
 
"I believe that he (Guede) felt that his life was over, he was very upset with Meredith Kercher, for causing him to kill her,” he said. “It’s very twisted logic, but this was an act of revenge,” Hendry said. 
 
Hendry believes Guede was burglarizing the cottage and was surprised and angered by Kercher’s presence.
 
He also said that Amanda Knox was incapable of inflicting the mortal knife wound, which was three inches long and quite deep.
 
"Basically, it takes someone very strong to do this," he said.  
 
Prosecutors concluded that the break-in was staged and that Knox and Sollecito threw a rock through the window of one of the bedrooms to cover up the murder.  
 
“The biggest blunder that they (police) made in this case is with regard to the break-in. They didn’t investigate it,” Hendry said.   
 
During the trial, it was clear that police and prosecutors didn’t believe that a burglar would try to break into the cottage from a second story window that could be seen from the street above.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 15 of 24

hebeshebewebe said on November 29, 2010 at 3:31 AM

tj1999 you really don't know how spoiled and overindulged contribute to a spoiled kid figureing she can do what ever she wants, lie her way out of any pinch? Her parents more than likely did not ever confront her in her lies growing up as all kids lie growing up, but you see genius they are supposed to be called on it. It leads to a warped , skewed, pathological and almost always criminal personality. You see she did it.... but her lack of real parenting OBVIOUSLY contributed.

56494362
Flag this comment

goking said on November 27, 2010 at 4:56 PM

Linda, You da bomb!!! Thank you thank you, for your report!!!! -michelle

56439913
Flag this comment

tj1999 said on November 26, 2010 at 12:25 PM

@telman What does spoiled and overindulged have to do with anything related to the trial? Sounds like someone has a major grudge against wealthy women specifically wealthy American women. Get some help.

56393329
Flag this comment

phanuelb said on November 25, 2010 at 1:44 PM

saintquickey writes, "I wonder how many people making comments really did go to the trial or read the transcripts of the trial." Italian law does not permit full public access to the trial record. Aside from "Judge" Massei's 427 page speculation report, not one trial document in its original unaltered form is available on the Internet so that those with an interest in the case can see for themselves if justices was done. The reason for this law is to shield a dysfunctional judicial system from public scrutiny. People who were not at the trial have every right to pass judgment on this proceeding. Major American news organizations have had their correspondents report on the case and these people have come back breathing fire. This was a kangaroo court that has shamed all of Italy.

56358491
Flag this comment

blankingout said on November 25, 2010 at 10:49 AM

Why did Amanda and her boyfriend stay while Rudy, who plead guilty to murder, flee? Why is it some people on here are afraid of things or people with scientific backgrounds that keep coming forward to prove her innocence?

56354084
Flag this comment

chubbs said on November 25, 2010 at 9:48 AM

@ronulus You have no credibility when you are hawking your website. The only physical evidence was from the Italian murderer, Guede. His bloody handprint found on a pillow under the victim's back. His DNA was found in several locations in the bedroom: on and inside Kercher's body; on her shirt and bra; mixed with her blood splatter;[citation needed] and on her handbag. Guede's DNA was also found on toilet paper in one of the bathrooms.

56351799
Flag this comment

ronulus said on November 25, 2010 at 9:43 AM

The only thing that seems to be clear is that Linda Byron has been carrying PR shill water on this for years for the Marriott firm, Anne Bremner, Heavey,et al. In fact the entire local media market has been shilling for Marriott who came out of local TV. They roped in every media figure they could including former colleague turned network infomercialist, Peter Van Sant whose producer on the Knox story was convicted of extortion of Letterman. Collectively, by colluding in the PR misinformation campaign and slurring the Italian system and their officials they have cast an ugly shadow on all Seattleites who are not abetting their shill game. There was a murder, mountains of evidence, much of which could be thrown out and still result in conviction in the US, yet the shills treat it like some reality TV game show.

56351586
Flag this comment

ronulus said on November 25, 2010 at 9:26 AM

I saw this interview and what struck me was how clueless this latest arrival to his fifteen minutes is about the case. One of the strongest pieces of the mountain of evidence is the window which could not have been entered from the outside without causing grievous injuries to the entrant and would have resulted in the burglar's blood on the window and throughout the room. It is also laughable to say that it requires any strength to insert a knife into someone's throat. He like the other shills for Knox's PR crew really should read the evidence and findings before making a fool of himself. He is even more detached from the evidence than the self serving and conflict ridden former FBI agent whose wife thought they should get on TV too. The evidence and four hundred pages of court findings are available at truejustice.org.

56350806
Flag this comment

saintquickey said on November 25, 2010 at 8:15 AM

I think there are a lot of twisted people in this case. There are also a lot of twisted comments about this case. I wonder how many people making comments really did go to the trial or read the transcripts of the trial.

56347668
Flag this comment

phanuelb said on November 25, 2010 at 5:54 AM

Thank you Linda Byron for this story about the efforts of a grass-roots movement to correct a terrible injustice. Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito are completely innocent. The people of Seattle should be doing more. One of their own has been taken hostage by a lynch mob on the other side of the world. They should be marching in the streets with torches. Ron Hendry has but scratched the surface on this travesty. All evidence points straight to Rudy Guede. No credible evidence implicates Amanda and Raffaele. American commentators are calling this a "kangaroo court" and a "public lynching." An investigator put on site by CBS news called it an "injustice of biblical proportions." Senator Maria Cantwell stated that an "impartial jury" could not have reached this decision. The US State Department should get involved. The president should get involved. The Italian people have an obligation to rise up and reverse this outrage.

56342359
Flag this comment

maisondusuave663 said on November 25, 2010 at 4:56 AM

"During the trial, it was clear that police and prosecutors didn’t believe that a burglar would try to break into the cottage from a second story window that could be seen from the street above." .....and the climb to the window and through almost impossible to open shutters to climb in while clinging to the wall ...and there was no physical evidence left of anyone climbing through; no marks or scuffs on the wall, no hair, fibre, fingerprints, DNA around the window/shutters etc ...and the grass beneath the window not trampled ...and the window was broken from the inside after the clothes were thrown around (glass on top) ...and there was broken glass on the inner sill that would have been disturbed by someone climbing in ..and .Raffaele told the police that nothing was stolen when he couldn't possibly know. ...no physical evidence left by Rudy in Filomena's room at all ...and there was another obvious, easier route for breaking into the kitchen

56340854
Flag this comment

hebeshebewebe said on November 25, 2010 at 3:03 AM

All the family members here who post personal attacks on other posters are so easy to see through. Just like the FBI clown who ignores all the DNA evidence to declare her innocence.....Now we have this "forensics engineer" declaring her innocence because of a picture. Look why don't you READ the transcripts and explain ALL her lies. You see you won't prevail with concocting some scheme to get her released. She was convicted because she did it. READ the transcripts. No really.

56339116
Flag this comment

maisondusuave663 said on November 25, 2010 at 2:35 AM

This would be really, really funny if it weren't tragic. This forensic engineer is qualified only to confirm that the victim was not killed by someone cutting her brake cable. This is ridiculous. If he had anything of value to contribute, why isn't he testifying for the defense? He hasn't anything sensible to contribute, so no trip to Italy, no exoneration of the killers, just a really stupid piece on King 5. There's nothing left at the bottom of the barrel. Why do you insult everyone's intelligence?

56338721
Flag this comment

nocando said on November 24, 2010 at 11:57 PM

Where does Solliceto come in DNA brastrap Theres more to it.There was a stage.Where does Amanda fit.I have studied this.Stranger than a ship of fools!Amanda was 2nd party unwiitingly went along with Sollecitto.coverup.What could possibly be her motive?why not tell the truth,Did she really slash this girl!I don't think so. total vindication not a chance. wrong place wrong time wrong church wrong country Sorry Amanda I love You!

56336393
Flag this comment

catconway said on November 24, 2010 at 11:28 PM

I am curious as to how many people who are so convinced Amanda is either guilty or innocent have read the entire transcripts of the trial, or who have seen evidence that would convict/exonerate her that weren't given at the trial. If not, how can people be so passionate in their beliefs?

56335834
Flag this comment

shazam said on November 24, 2010 at 11:24 PM

Fascinating Linda !! You're the best there is. I want to know more about this forensic engineer. It made a great deal of sense to me. Thanks for bringing him to our attention !

56335763
Flag this comment

telman said on November 24, 2010 at 10:41 PM

Lynda you are at it again. The young woman is a spoiled over indulged brat that has had it too easy and now she is in big trouble and daddy's money is not going to get her released any time soon. See you in 30 years Amanda if you live that long.

56334764
Flag this comment

nocando said on November 24, 2010 at 10:41 PM

I am tracking this Solliceto dude And Guede.Why wasn't this put together as Guede and Sollicetto.Bra strap and DNA Sollicetto.Foot print of Guede?Hypothethical but Amanda doesn't fit unless involved in cover up for loverboy Confession compromised.Felony after the fact.Sollicitto smug coaching Amanda?Sollicitto stays in background doesn't defend Amanda !Paradox!

56334754
Flag this comment

brucefisher said on November 24, 2010 at 10:19 PM

Linda, Thank you for this excellent report. Ron Hendry has done extensive research on this case. His expert opinion must not be ignored. The truth is clear for anyone who is willing to see it. Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito have been wrongly convicted.

56334219
Flag this comment

brucefisher said on November 24, 2010 at 10:18 PM

Linda, Thank you for this excellent report. Ron Hendry has done extensive research on this case. His expert opinion must not be ignored. The truth is clear for anyone willing to see it. Amanda Knox and Raffaele have been wrongly convicted.

56334163
Flag this comment

barbrn said on November 24, 2010 at 10:06 PM

boobiewah - your name says it all....to truly look at the facts of the case and say she is anything other than innocent makes you a boob!

56333843
Flag this comment

collegeguy said on November 24, 2010 at 10:02 PM

yes, boobiewah, you sure know forensics and reality! The evidence has NEVER supported the conclusion of guilty that was made, you dingus. Any person with half a brain who has some understanding can easily see the many flaws in the so called evidence.

56333701
Flag this comment

boobiewah said on November 24, 2010 at 9:51 PM

How ridiculous to think that she can get away with murder on her appeal. Look at all the evidence and try to say that she is innocent. Living in Denial is so sad.

56333408
Flag this comment

boobiewah said on November 24, 2010 at 9:45 PM

She is Guilty and will be found Guilty a second time on her appeal.

56333193
Flag this comment