Print
Email
Share

Child removed from class because of hair product

by TONYA MOSLEY / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @TonyaMosley

KING5.com

Posted on June 4, 2010 at 6:09 PM

SEATTLE - Bellen Drake still can't believe she's here, at a news conference with the NAACP, fighting to get her 8-year-old daughter back into honors classes - all because of hair moisturizer.

"I couldn't comprehend it. I was trying to make sense of it and it took awhile," said Bellen.

Bellen says late last month, the teacher pulled her daughter out of class at Thurgood Marshall Elementary and into the hallway.

"My daughter reports that she kept saying she's afraid and it's your hair and that she could go to another class for the rest of the day."

Bellen says the school never contacted her about it, but instead removed the girl from her honors class and into a regular classroom.

"This is about the conduct of an adult and the ramification of that conduct by the principal," says Vonda Sargent, the family's attorney.

It was the talk of the salon at Good Hair in Seattle. Stylist Danyale Thomas says singling out a biracial child about her hair in front of her peers is damaging.

"It just seems like with adults and especially in the school system, they'd be aware of the differences culturally and know how to handle it as such," said Thomas.

The district says it cannot comment on the specifics of the incident.

"We're concerned and we're looking into it. Our priority is to get the child back in school," said media spokesperson Theresa Whipple.

Bellen says all she's asking for is a meeting with the district and a chance for her daughter to return to school.

"Everyday she's asking when she's going back to school," said Bellen.

Earlier in the school year, parents were notified that this teacher had allergies. The NAACP plans to file a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 15 of 18

jinxedagain said on July 18, 2011 at 11:27 AM

... and you cannot be prepared for EVERY allergy with shots or medication. It just doesn't work that way

70882749
Flag this comment

jinxedagain said on July 18, 2011 at 11:18 AM

You can have an allergic reaction to a hair product someone else has used. My daughter came home from college after using a conditioner with apple "essence" in it. within 10 minutes, i had a severe allergic reaction. Simple solution. She doesn't use it when she comes home anymore. Teacher should have contacted the parent immediately if she felt there was an allergy issue and ask that she use something else. There are tons of products out there. Even of the hair in question. If the parent refused, (no courteous person would refuse a medical related request I would hope) then the teacher should have gone to administration. Same as if a child or teacher has a peanut allergy. I don't see why this ended up being a racial issue. Other than to make headlines.

70882284
Flag this comment

tsalazar said on June 14, 2010 at 5:28 AM

Turblumber: Your comments are completely ridiculous. Everyone's hair is different. Her hair is curly. When you have curly hair it is hard for your natural oils to reach the ends of your hair, thus allowing breakage and dryness to occur. Dont speak of things you do not know. Why would you ever wish that there could be a complaint filed against a group that has a goal to protect the rights of people? Would you wish that there was a chance that we could have sued the National Woman's Suffrage Association, or any other social reform group that stood for providing equality amongs a humanity that doesn't truly believe in the term? You probably feel good about your comments and as though you really gave us an ear full with your ideology, but you did none of that. You picked on a child because of her hair mositurizer that got her kicked out of a class she was rightfully in. You disregarded her right to an education and the alternative means that could have been taken to prevent these measures

45328769
Flag this comment

tsalazar said on June 14, 2010 at 5:12 AM

What I don't understand is why people are ignoring the true problem here regardless if it was racially motivated or not! This child was removed from her class and singled out even more than she already was. Of course the welfare of others should be regarded, especially the teacher, but what about the child? How come she was not given the opportunity to at least change her hair care conditioners because my God there are not other conditioners out there that her parents could have bought to relieve whatever allergic reaction this teacher was having? So every time this teacher has a problem with the way a child smells is she going to have that child removed as well? Or what if she is in any other institution or public place is she going to have those people removed because they are bothering her allergies? If they were that bad how come she was not on stronger dosages? There are shots out there for situations like these! She took drastic measures that hindered this child's education!

45328074
Flag this comment

tsalazar said on June 14, 2010 at 4:58 AM

Is it not a school policy to notify the parents if there was a problem of any kind before making arrangements regarding their child? Do they not keep a progress report for the parents regarding the grades? Why would they not allow the parents a report over something such as this. Apparently it was imperative to the teacher so why not include the parents? Perhaps sending a letter or making a call to the parents informing them to potentially change the child's hair care regimen could have been suggested, but it does not seem that it crossed this teachers mind. Maybe it did and she ignored it. All she wanted was the child out of her class and she did what she could to see to that. What else would this be about if it wasn't about the current suggestions? Regardless of how well educated, talented, and dedicated this teacher was does not exclude her potential to make stupid judgements and I will go as far and say, act of bad moral character. A simple meeting w/the parents would have sufficed

45327569
Flag this comment

elijahwisdom said on June 7, 2010 at 4:33 PM

Here's the problem I have. It doesn't matter what hair she had...Why was she transferred to another class without notification of the parents? The idea of the child being happy with she wants instead of what she needs is the sorriest line of reasoning. I'm not going to fired up on here but if people would pay attention to the whole story intead of bullet points, then you'll understand why the NAACP was involved. Now on a racial note.. There's not any white person in any town who will allow their kids' educational opportunities to be downsized in the name of a hair product!! And believe it or not, we are not satisfied with just sitting at the front of the bus anymore!! And forget about that line about Obama being president because he doesn't have a high school named after him. However the school is named after a black man. Which makes the INJUSTICE and these responses go hand and hand with idiocy.

44900883
Flag this comment

mkonings said on June 7, 2010 at 8:49 AM

I know the teacher in question very well. She was our daughter's advanced placement teacher last year at Lowell Elementary. I helped out in the classroom many times and had additional contact with her as a PTA board member. She's an incredibly talented and dedicated teacher and well respected by many, many parents. When our daughter was assigned to her class last year so many parents told me how lucky we were. I do not believe race has anything to do with the current situation and it's unfortunate the parents choose to make it an issue. Unfortunately with the lawyers now involved, we can't learn the teacher's side of the story or what was discussed in the school other that what the parents are saying.

44869847
Flag this comment

olyjim said on June 6, 2010 at 3:27 PM

This is outragous....Why is noone concerned with the health and well being of the teacher? Rebelron, why does the teacher have an attitude problem???? If the family or NAACP sues they should have to repay the district's legal fees, but that won't happen...The district will settle because it's cheaper than fighting...If this was my school district I would be at every board meeting telling them to fight!!!!

44835824
Flag this comment

aunt_rie said on June 6, 2010 at 1:56 PM

All schools should be fragrance free zones. Most of todays fragrances that you find in personal care products and laundry products are petroleum based instead of being based on natural oils. My whole family is very allergic and i know first hand how hard it is to breath when around people that use excessive fragrances or mix multiple fragranced products. These products can also cause asthma attacks in adults as well as children, I know this because my own mother suffers with it. I hope the teacher in this case has a whole team of professionals to back her up. The world needs to wake up realize what fragrances do to an ever increasing allergic population. A basic rule should apply to all, and that is "your rights end where my nose begins."

44833593
Flag this comment

brucelee said on June 5, 2010 at 1:02 PM

This school approves hair gels from L.A. Looks, but nothing else!

44792344
Flag this comment

rebelron said on June 5, 2010 at 11:21 AM

Me thinks there is something wrong with situation,I dont thing it's all about a hair thing.This teacher has some serious attitude problems toward this poor child.I think the parents should sue the school and/or the School District for discrimnation and malice.thank you very much

44788268
Flag this comment

alicynx said on June 5, 2010 at 9:37 AM

You cannot tell me this woman had an allergy to the f*$@ing SMELL of a moisturizer. That is beyond ridiculous - with no airborne contaminants to react to, the teacher is either a hypochondriac (who should not be teaching children) or she has something against this child. Someone who believes she has allergies so acute that the smell of a non-airborne substance can make her sick should NOT be working with the public, period. Put this girl back into her honors class (yes turb, there are honors classes even at that age, and at 35 I can tell you they had them when I was a child, because I was in them) and get that nutso teacher away from the public - give her an office job, where she can limit the smells she has to encounter. Don't let her continue to scare kids with her alarmist attitudes about things that won't hurt her!

44782782
Flag this comment

bobknows said on June 5, 2010 at 8:12 AM

Is anyone else old enough to remember when MEN ran the schools? Is anyone fool enough to think that any of this would have happened with men running the schools? Its a disaster at taxpayer expense. The lot of them should be fired.

44778777
Flag this comment

turblumber said on June 5, 2010 at 5:31 AM

whoa. Whoa. WHOA... Who the HELL? Why the hell is the NAACP involved? This has absolutely N O T H I N G to do with the child's race. She's in ELEMENTARY honors classes? What the heck? Weren't Honor's classes reserved for Jr and Sr High Students? The parent's were notified about the teacher's allergies and yet persisted to continually use the same moisturizer? First off, the mother needs to be slapped, then the girl needs some better shampoo and conditioner if she's using "Hair Moisturizer." The Kid and the mother need to work backwards, start by using a lotion consisting of something else other than Olive Oil. No Luck? Try a different shampoo & conditioner. No Luck? Take your child out of a class she doesn't need to be in. I mean COMON, Honors in Elementary School? Tanya Mosely, find something else to focus on. For God's sake King5, please stop reporting worthless news such as this. I'm praying there will be an opportunity for us to file a complaint against the NAACP.

44772467
Flag this comment

maynerdgkrebbs said on June 4, 2010 at 9:53 PM

The article states the child is still in school. Just NOT the class MOM wants. The child is getting her needs an education,not her wants . separate what needs and wants are. Using this we might actually balance the state and federal budget, separating wants and needs go along way.

44765023
Flag this comment

native6th said on June 4, 2010 at 9:34 PM

one only has to report health problems to an employer if they prevent one from doing the job one was hired to perform. the teacher was out of line by not reporting her problems. gee she should have not been hired. perhaps could not do the job. the teacher handled this very poorly. one would think she could have been an adult about the situation. you would think some tact and diplomacy in the school talking to the parent. bet there was a different product that could have been used on the childs hair. this is nothing about race, color, or creed. this is about a teacher thinking she is above reproach and the world revolves around her and her needs. the school and the teacher should loose on this one hands down. could sure give this mom some pointers on how to handle teachers and staff. hope she has a good lawyer and perhaps the teacher can join the unemployment lines.

44764394
Flag this comment

realisticnative said on June 4, 2010 at 8:28 PM

Right on Tomma. It's too bad this couldn't be handled upfront by both sides instead of getting dragged up and involving the naalcp for no reason. Get real folks, allergies are not racist...

44762263
Flag this comment

tomma206 said on June 4, 2010 at 7:53 PM

Well if the parents were notified about the allergy and yet still applied it in the kids hair, its their fault.Poor kid for her parents mistake.Foolish naacp for even thinking this is racial.Time for the nannies to hush up and go back to sleep.Call me racist i dare you

44760753
Flag this comment