Print
Email
Share

Sex offender sues family he victimized

by TONYA MOSLEY / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @TonyaMosley

KING5.com

Posted on May 20, 2011 at 5:39 PM

TACOMA, Wash. -- A Tacoma mother says her family is going broke fighting a legal battle against a man convicted of victimizing their child.

A sex offender, Patrick Rojas, is suing the mother for negative comments she made about him on her blog. Rojas, 26, was convicted four years ago of innappropriate contact with Danielle Schneider's 11-year-old child.

Danielle spends her days cleaning, cooking and caring for her family, but at night when all six of her kids are asleep, she says she blogs about him.

"His story became my story when he chose to abuse my child," Danielle said. "I just felt if I could save one child from being abused, I could take being vulnerable and sharing my story," she said.

But sharing her story has come at a price. Rojas is now suing Danielle for $60,000. He says she's slandering his name. Now mounting legal bills and counseling for their daughter has left Danielle's family almost broke.

"My husband and I have had to go to food banks," Danielle said.

KING 5 News spoke with Mike Davis, Rojas' attorney, who said he tried to come to some sort of compromise with the Schneiders before filing a lawsuit. He says there are many details on the site that are private information and simply not true. He also says Rojas served his time and has gone to counseling.

Davis hopes to come to an agreement with the family before this goes to trial in December.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 15 of 60

Woodsman said on September 29, 2011 at 11:10 PM

dankemper pretty much sums it up. It isn't enough that her daughter went through this but now her mom has to continually reopen the wound day after day. Instead of being able to heal the bandage gets ripped off continually so her mother can get revenge. This has become all about her mother now and the daughter will just have to sit back and take it as her mother goes on and on. The daughter will probably move away at the earliest possible opportunity just to try to get away from it all. As for the mothers "facts" I'd bet a careful examination of what she is portraying would expose a heavily misleading and slanted blog. What Rojas did is wrong, and what she is doing is wrong. Sad.

74575019
Flag this comment

dankemper said on May 25, 2011 at 11:39 PM

She is hurting her own family by continuing down this path. Where is the father in all this? Why is he not stopping his wife? Will he sit like a potted plant while she implodes her own family?

67751096
Flag this comment

dankemper said on May 25, 2011 at 11:33 PM

Schneider attacks not only Rojas but many others not remotely related to her child's case. She is a cyber bully that needs to be stopped. A clear message should be sent that vigilante antics are not acceptable. Her methods have not helped her own daughter or herself heal but have badly damaged countless lives. I wish she would own up the her name calling defaming website, absolute zero united. I do not condone Rojas actions but a message needs to be sent to this unstable woman that she can no longer serve as judge and jury via cyper bullying.

67750972
Flag this comment

stryker said on May 23, 2011 at 2:37 PM

Hey Patrick, I have some 11 year olds, wanna come over and play?

67571689
Flag this comment

stryker said on May 23, 2011 at 2:35 PM

No way I would let this little pr|ck continue with this. If this F'r had affected someone in my family, he would not be able to pull this sh|t. Someone should cut his junk off and cram it down his throat.

67571539
Flag this comment

ex_bkr said on May 23, 2011 at 11:01 AM

( shaking my head,,,,,) Slandering the name of a child sex offender ?!?!?!?!?!?! Really?!?!?!? How is that even possible ???

67558802
Flag this comment

vikingjimmy said on May 23, 2011 at 10:39 AM

I do feel bad for the mother and the victim. But I would not donate to this cause with so many other worthy causes out there more deserving than this. U camp in the woods, u get attacked by a bear. You fend off said bear after he tears your arm off. Bear runs away. You don't go back into the woods and try to find the bear so you can take out your agression on the bear for him leaving you without an arm. Don't poke the BEAR!!!

67557517
Flag this comment

waycash155207539 said on May 23, 2011 at 9:47 AM

This is what is wrong with are legal system. This sex offender should have no rights. Let him rot in hell.

67554129
Flag this comment

snocoguy said on May 23, 2011 at 9:27 AM

This is exactly what is wrong with the world.

67552777
Flag this comment

wmdkitty said on May 22, 2011 at 10:54 PM

Really? REALLY?! *disgusted*

67532409
Flag this comment

shoreline said on May 22, 2011 at 8:59 PM

Mom blogging every day isn't going to help her child heal. In fact, mom is dragging her daughter through more hell by ruining her family's finances. Money that could have been used for therapy now has to be diverted to defending a lawsuit that mom brought upon herself! Blog to your heart's content about the FACTS of the case and what this sub-human man did. Litter the city with his picture and description of what he was convicted of. But blogging things that aren't fact or simply untrue about this guy.... you opened this can of worms yourself! You could have blogged about just the facts and gotten your message out. Maybe mom should spend more of her effort on her daughter and not on this creep.

67530096
Flag this comment

Happy2live said on May 22, 2011 at 7:46 PM

Seems to me there is a wide range of possibilities "innapropriate contact" could mean. Us not involved in the trial, as we don't know what happend shouldnt assume things about this case without doing any research on this specific case. The mother should have took the original offer from the attorney before the lawsuit started. Then atlease she wouldnt be swammped with legal bills, and her and her family could have been back to continuing on with life.. Genius!! No sympathy for mom, just the daughter for having been victimized and then slowly reminded of that dispicable event everyday by mom as shes on the computer all day everyday blogging, trolling and rambling on and on and on.. Good grief..

67528263
Flag this comment

fosterp said on May 22, 2011 at 3:22 PM

If the lawsuit had no merit...she wouldn't have legal bills mounting up, as the case would have already been dismissed by a judge.

67520628
Flag this comment

KatieLincoln said on May 22, 2011 at 10:25 AM

TAH! Keep your hands off the children and there wouldnt be a reason for their parents to have to deal with you on any level. I agree with the individual who said.. no money, no pay off. To the mom.. Blog your heart darlin. Your story and his does intertwine now, because of how he touched your baby. Maybe you should sue him for destroying that precious child and her outlook on life, security, and intimacy. I deal with the sex offenders on a daily basis through a web site for missing children. Befriend me on FB and send the link to my page.. I'll pass it forward. One of the biggest issues is the silent world of the survivors and their families. If more people shared their experiences, more people would understand what's going on. Prayers and love to you and your little one.

67512007
Flag this comment

dakotanative said on May 21, 2011 at 10:42 PM

fosterp is right. Blogging about what the guy MIGHT do is infamatory and fixes nothing. If you want to spend hours a day doing something, spend the time lobbying for more harsh penalties. I don't even agree with labeling sex offenders after they have served their time. Do we have a drunk driver registry for drivers who have KILLED people telling how I agree that drunks and rapists need to be monitored if they are likely to reoffend, but not on the streets. They need to remain locked up until either dead or rehabilitated.

67494794
Flag this comment

smoocher1 said on May 21, 2011 at 10:40 PM

This family should declare bankruptcy... no assets no payoff.

67494752
Flag this comment

squaw14 said on May 21, 2011 at 9:29 PM

How can she be sued when Sex Offenders are on Internet with the charges they did. This is for life time. Victims need to be protected.

67493307
Flag this comment

fosterp said on May 21, 2011 at 9:27 PM

@remainingreal - What is "as far as your concerned" doesn't mean jack in the reality of the matter. In this country, criminals do not lose all of their civil rights when they are convicted of crimes. It doesn't matter what you "think" is right, the law is the law. If you don't like that, then you should lobby for change, or run for office. It is a tort when someone says publishes false information that is damaging to someone else's reputation. The only defense for the mom's actions in this case is 1) the information is true, or 2) Rojas' reputation is already so bad that her publication could not have made it any worse. Claiming that the laws should not apply in certain circumstances is completely ignorant and only shows disregard for how the justice system in this country operates.

67493254
Flag this comment

wojdalski said on May 21, 2011 at 7:45 PM

The real criminal here is the attorney who took the perpetrator's case. Shame on him/her.

67490396
Flag this comment

remainingreal said on May 21, 2011 at 3:59 PM

Ihasamom-the taxpayers aren't paying for this, the two parties involved are paying for it. The taxpayers pay when the STATE is involved. Stave vs. whomever. [I think.]

67483142
Flag this comment

remainingreal said on May 21, 2011 at 3:55 PM

fosterp-even if it is the case about her speaking this way about the family, why hasn't the family come to sue her? It's just the criminal suing. If they have a problem with it, they should be suing her, not him. I'm sorry, but I don't agree with you. And I REALLY don't agree with any of you who say she just stop, settle and move on. This lawsuit was brought on by THE CRIMINAL. As far as I'm concerned, he lost his rights when he committed the act. How can you defend someone who is despicable? It's the same as the stinking burglar who sues the people he is robbing because he got hurt while robbing them. Too stinking BAD!!! Quit sticking up for the criminal.

67483009
Flag this comment

Happy2live said on May 21, 2011 at 3:38 PM

I agree with fosterp and bazwest, just stop the slander, settle and move on.

67482452
Flag this comment

freedomthinker said on May 21, 2011 at 2:37 PM

how can something be both "private information" and "simply not true"?

67480434
Flag this comment

fosterp said on May 21, 2011 at 2:16 PM

As sick as this person is for the crime he committed, if you read this woman's blog you will see she makes some astounding claims of fact not only about Patrick but also about his family members. Those facts, which if true, would be incredibly damaging to the reputation of his family, who have not been convicted or charged with any crimes in this situation. Since Patrick is already a registered sex offender, it would be pretty hard to show any actual damages to his reputation (can it really get any lower than being a convicted sex offender?). However the statements about his family could be damaging, and if she cannot show these statements to be true, it IS libel, and there is a case.

67479771
Flag this comment

walts said on May 21, 2011 at 1:26 PM

should of just hung him. done deal

67478201
Flag this comment

bazwest said on May 21, 2011 at 12:33 PM

There is no justification for abusing children and this guy was convicted and served his time for that. That is how it works in our country. At the same time, this lady has the right to tell her story if she sticks to the facts, but if she is embellishing the truth, making stuff up, and basically lying in order to do him damage then he may have a claim against her for slander. It may not seem fair, but it is. He would not have a case if she stuck with the facts as they came out in the trial. If there is no further possibility that he can hurt her child again it is so much better for her to get on with life and forgive the guy. That is how you get rid of him emotionally. Instead she and her family are being held hostage by the memory of what this guy has done. They choose to keep living it instead of getting on with life. There is so much more joy from living life in the light than from living in the shadows of a tragic situation.

67476159
Flag this comment

unconnected said on May 21, 2011 at 11:22 AM

hahahahahhahaa many many lulz to be had this weekend.

67473166
Flag this comment

Rattler said on May 21, 2011 at 8:26 AM

OK..read the blog....they all deserve each other.

67466283
Flag this comment

Rattler said on May 21, 2011 at 8:17 AM

On the face of it...I am surprised he is still alive....unless he courting disaster. On the other hand, I would have to see the blogs and on line postings. We all know a "wacko" crazy lady who lives down the block.

67465883
Flag this comment

msbetty said on May 21, 2011 at 8:16 AM

Read the original story posted to King5 on March 3, 2011. Schneider had offered to take down the site if Rojas dropped the suit, as they could not afford any more legal bills. Rojas and his attorney said they would still sue. My conclusion? This is about a chimo who can't get a job because of his CRIME (not Schneider's blog), and now he figures his paycheck will instead come in the form of a lawsuit and payout. He's not fooling anyone. Just because you served your time doesn't make the original crime go away - and in this case, he didn't steal someone's bicycle -- he violated a child, and she has to live with that the rest of her life. Rojas? You deserve everything you get now - rot in hell.

67465819
Flag this comment

chuckstr76 said on May 21, 2011 at 7:49 AM

As a convicted felon, he should have no rights in this matter.

67464504
Flag this comment

unhappy said on May 21, 2011 at 5:53 AM

what kind of low life lawyer would even help him..... Sue him for civil damages.......

67459517
Flag this comment

kingsolver1000rr said on May 21, 2011 at 12:14 AM

one in the chest, one in the head

67452688
Flag this comment

camero said on May 21, 2011 at 12:10 AM

He was convicted and how about sue him for the damages being done to Danielle's family.

67452652
Flag this comment

shimo said on May 20, 2011 at 11:54 PM

Only in America! Though I don't think this going to go too far in civil court, but than again this is Washington. The victim can sue this piece and his family of pieces for pain and suffering which probably have a better chance to stand in civil court. The silver linning is everybody can play this legal game.

67451537
Flag this comment

lovewashington said on May 20, 2011 at 11:37 PM

In my book he lost all his rights when he molested that child. He doesn't get those back . This child does not get her childhood back so why should he. The hell with him and the boat he sailed here on..

67450723
Flag this comment

monroe527 said on May 20, 2011 at 10:37 PM

He's a convict sex offender! Right there he has lost all rights! He's barely a human being now,,,,,, he's as low as low goes and if most people had there when it comes to punishing sex offenders he wouldn't even be living. If this goes to a jury I would be very surprised if he wins anything at all! Slandering his name come on! His name is already mud in circles that know what he has done. Also to anyone that does a back ground check on him before employing him.

67449614
Flag this comment

Mike_Larson976 said on May 20, 2011 at 10:27 PM

Yes he was convivted, but their is a reason this is slander and it isnt because she said the truth, we all know that duh! He was convicted inapropriate contact with a minor we all know that part, the slander is all the other @%$# this lady is saying about him and his family wich is never right to gossip publicly about here say and rumors about people wich is what she is doing, just go read her blog and then decide what she is saying, before commenting.

67449428
Flag this comment

biggr said on May 20, 2011 at 9:42 PM

Oh man if this isnt the outrage of the year I dont know what is. Number 1, in my opinion, a child molestor/rapist is about the lowest form of life there is. #2 next in line is the type of attorney that would even represent that type of person in the 1st place let alone take a case like this. I dont see how the "atty" can sleep at night knowing he is hurting an hardworking honest family for the benefit of freako sick criminal like a child molester!?! I hope this kids parents are real proud of the "boy" they raised - I I had my choice or it was my son/daughter he did that too - his parents would be visiting his grave! I think child molesters should hang - they arent even worth the cost of a bullet let alone the rope they would swing from.

67448256
Flag this comment

lhasamom said on May 20, 2011 at 9:23 PM

So now he could sue anyone that hurts his pea brain feelings on a blog. Sheesh what a waste of tax payers money and time.

67447652
Flag this comment

gracer said on May 20, 2011 at 9:21 PM

So, is he going to sue King5 now for "dragging his name" through the mud? What a loser. You chose to be despicable. Sex offenders are never "cured" or "fixed". Can we start a legal fund for the family to fight this perv??!

67447592
Flag this comment

livinglife said on May 20, 2011 at 9:15 PM

he was convicted. He choose the crime he committed. It has changed the families lives in so many ways that I can not imagine. If the mother blogs about her life and her day, her life and days are now changed because of what this guy did to her family. Its his own fault and he should not be able to sue them for it.

67447399
Flag this comment

aziza said on May 20, 2011 at 9:10 PM

granny? Her intent was to warn other parents and to spare any other children of what this monster did to her child. The fact that she isn't "moving on" is rather selfless and heroic.

67447106
Flag this comment

aziza said on May 20, 2011 at 9:07 PM

This is so absurd! He was convicted and its a matter of public record!

67446982
Flag this comment

kittykat1912 said on May 20, 2011 at 9:04 PM

He was CONVICTED! It's only slander if it's untrue.

67446838
Flag this comment

grannydub said on May 20, 2011 at 8:51 PM

I would never defend a child molester! Never! But why would the victim's mother spend her time and energy blogging about him? Good grief.....move on and take care of your child.

67446383
Flag this comment

glock2117 said on May 20, 2011 at 8:38 PM

classic america

67445834
Flag this comment

Mike_Larson976 said on May 20, 2011 at 7:23 PM

I hate pedophiles, It is despicable, but GOD is the only judge jury and executioner... He served his time, for now the slander needs to stop.. It is her sinking as low or lower because it is not just making people aware of this sex offender and what he did, she has hundreds of rambles of what she PREDICTS he might do, could do, and she takes rumors and tries to make them facts and even worse she publishes them as the truth... Now it is going viral because she brought the media in on this.. Sorry lady but that is SLANDER.. And it is not helping or making you a better person. I read alot of the blog and to me I see alot of Slander, and to me Slander is a terrible thing to do to someone, specially after they have been so called rehabilitated by serving his time. She needs to stop the rumors and slanderous comments in her blog or she is infact breaking the law and I hope he wins, not money, but the right to have the Rumors, and un verified sladerous comments removed from her blog!

67442417
Flag this comment

ohmygoodness said on May 20, 2011 at 7:14 PM

The idea that this pervert feels slandered by his victim's family is mind-boggling. HIS actions created his "image"..and HE is responsible for the limitations he now deals with....and his crying about having the blog appear when his name is entered in an internet search, Well, 'Whah-whah-whah"...That's part of the open records act & freedom of information. Should've thought about that several years ago. Unfortunately, you get to deal with the long-standing consequences of that 'scarlet letter' that being a sex offender brings. Hopefully, the young, innocent victim will find some peace through counseling & her family's love & support. This is a frivolous lawsuit @ it's finest.

67441931
Flag this comment

cpenrico24274615 said on May 20, 2011 at 7:14 PM

Slime!

67441892
Flag this comment

sealass said on May 20, 2011 at 7:11 PM

What????? he lost his rights the second he violated a child ...........he needs to disappear

67441793
Flag this comment

TheOtherSide said on May 20, 2011 at 7:11 PM

Does he think he is immune to not being discussed since he violated an 11 year old??? WTH? Since he is a sex offender, we all have every right to talk about what needs to be discussed. Sounds like Patrick Rojas needs to grow up and accept the consequenses for his actions. Maybe, just maybe, the unwanted attention he has received will deter him from repeating his actions in the future to another child. He made his bed, now he has to lay in it.

67441784
Flag this comment

stryker said on May 20, 2011 at 6:08 PM

per round

67438566
Flag this comment

stryker said on May 20, 2011 at 6:08 PM

I have 9mm, that I only paid 16.9 cents after tax, that I would gladly donate to see this scum go away.

67438546
Flag this comment

deenicshawn said on May 20, 2011 at 6:05 PM

I am curious of what kind of job Patrick had before he was a convicted sex offender. As a sex offender there are limits to where he can work. Maybe that is the reason he can not get a job....Patrick can not be around CHILDREN no matter how much time he spent in JAIL or how much therapy he has had...He is not allowed to leave by a school either is he suing the STATE for that...

67438477
Flag this comment

ameso said on May 20, 2011 at 6:00 PM

A .45 ACP round is only 30 cents.

67438251
Flag this comment

TeresaErik10 said on May 20, 2011 at 5:57 PM

I just read this blog and the comments left. I think this site needs to stay up because the whole family is a continued threat not just the son. I pray and hope that they are found so their own daughters can be protected from them. To Danielle stay stron and in prayer.

67438154
Flag this comment

Blewone said on May 20, 2011 at 5:55 PM

Wait, what? He slandered himself when he became a sex offender. This isn't some 18 year old who has sex with a 16/17year old and her parents freak because they wanted her to remain a virgin until she was married. Those types of cases are iffy to me, this victim is only 11 RIGHT NOW! What a spineless coward that has to sue his victim & put them through so much again. With the price of counseling, it's no wonder the mom takes to her blog as a way to heal herself while her daughter gets the actual counseling. Where is the justice in this?!??

67438091
Flag this comment

artsea said on May 20, 2011 at 5:55 PM

Every day I see stories like this. I have come to believe I no longer live in the America I was born in. I have begun to feel happy that I'm getting old and may not live to see the end of a once fair and decent country.

67438083
Flag this comment

biohazard1 said on May 20, 2011 at 5:54 PM

Ok now this is just the stupidest thing i have ever heard of..... if i was a judge i would throw this case out of court on the grounds it;s just stupid... so this idiot is re-victimizing the child all over again..... Slandering his name would be the LEAST of his problems if it was MY child.... he would be the NUTLESS WONDER.... if you know what i mean...! NO wonder our Legal System is in a mess... this mother has every right to tell the world about Rojas... before he strikes again and hurts someone elses child !!!

67438022
Flag this comment