Print
Email
Share

Lights out for electronic billboards in Tacoma

by CHRIS DANIELS / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @ChrisDaniels5

KING5.com

Posted on August 9, 2011 at 9:44 PM

Updated Tuesday, Aug 9 at 10:01 PM

TACOMA – Tacoma’s City Council voted Tuesday night to ban digital billboards in the city.

The move essentially voids a settlement agreement with Clear Channel Outdoor, which had sued the city 14 years ago over an ordinance to reduce billboards in the city. The company had agreed to take down dozens of traditional billboards, in exchange for the right to put up to 10 electronic billboards across the city.

The Council agreed to the terms of the deal earlier this year. But it was immediately met with criticism from people who were concerned about flashing lights outside their homes, including Neil Beckman. 

“I don’t like the looks of it right now,” said Beckman, who lives across the street from an existing billboard which looks down on his home. Clear Channel intended to turn it into an electronic sign.

“They are distracting. I’d probably move,” he said.

“I think it’s a matter of trying to do, with the resolution, what is best for the city,” said Tacoma Mayor Marilyn Strickland, a one-time digital billboard supporter. She says the original settlement would have reduced billboards by 85 percent, and acknowledges the resolution may prompt action from Clear Channel. 

“If there is a legal battle, we will have to deal with it as it comes,” said Strickland.

Clear Channel Outdoor’s Seattle Division President Olivia Lippens did not return a phone call for comment Tuesday night.  Another Clear Channel representative warned the council at the meeting that he believed their action opened the city to legal and financial risk, and would ultimately cost the city millions of dollars.
 

Print
Email
Share

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 6 of 6

wikblom said on August 10, 2011 at 3:28 PM

Brightly lit billboards are a pox on the community and make the entire town look like a trailer park. They need to be banned for the health and welfare of the community.

72156094
Flag this comment

c8lsonics said on August 10, 2011 at 10:18 AM

""Tacoma, America's #1 Wired City" is banning digital media.

72139057
Flag this comment

seamikey said on August 10, 2011 at 9:21 AM

The brightly lit, constantly changing billboards are a distraction to drivers. How many of you will admit to being drawn in to reading the billboard as you drive by, waiting to see what's next...just like you would while watching advertisements on TV? Your brain focuses on that specific task, taking away from the fact that you are DRIVING A CAR, and it can potentially lead to accidents much more often than the "standard, boring" billboard does.

72135471
Flag this comment

s10maniac said on August 10, 2011 at 5:01 AM

@maltbymike While making advertising harder might seem like a bad thing for business there may be some cases when it helps. When the government banded ads for smoking the tabaco companies were actually happy. The people that are going to smoke already smoke. They were in a competition between brands. By stoping advertising it saved each company millions of dollars. I do agree there are lots of things the government does to discourage business this may or may not be one.

72116622
Flag this comment

maltbymike said on August 10, 2011 at 3:58 AM

Another anti-business friendly decision. Congrats Tacoma your as stupid as the state and the federal government.

72113233
Flag this comment

Sir_Real said on August 9, 2011 at 10:47 PM

If an ordinance can void an agreement/settlement in Tacoma, then certainly an approved initiative to ban Red-light cams in Bellingham can void an agreement with a seedy AZ company.

72106037
Flag this comment