Print
Email
Share

Seattle officer charged for stomping handcuffed man in head

by KING 5 News and Associated Press

KING5.com

Posted on July 8, 2011 at 6:49 AM

Updated Friday, Jul 8 at 6:50 PM

SEATTLE – A Seattle police officer is now charged with assault for kicking a handcuffed man in the head following a fight outside a bar last year. But the police union president says the initial attack on the off duty officer was racially motivated and he is blasting the city attorney for filing charges.

Officer Garth Haynes is charged with fourth-degree assault, a gross misdemeanor, in connection with a December 2010 fight outside the Balmar Bar and Lounge. Seattle Police Guild President Rich O'Neill said the kicking incident, which was captured on a grainy dashcam video, came after three men assaulted Haynes.

"The Seattle Police Officers Guild is outraged by the decision of the City Attorney Peter Holmes to charge Seattle Police Officer Garth Haynes with assault. The whole story has yet to be told regarding this incident," said police guild president Rich O'Neill.

The Seattle City Attorney's Office brought the charge after the King County Prosecutor's Office declined to charge Haynes with a felony.

Haynes was at the Balmar with a friend when both men's jackets went missing. Haynes went outside, saw a woman holding the jackets and asked for them back.

While Haynes, who is black, was talking to the woman, he was jumped from behind by the three white men. Those men did not know the woman and, contrary to what they say, they were not coming to help the woman, O'Neill said.

Haynes called 911. When officers arrived, they handcuffed the three men. Hayes then stepped on one of the men's heads, which was caught on video.

O'Neill said there is a second video that hasn't been made public yet which shows the three men using racist comments toward Haynes as they are being taken to jail. One of the men allegedly said "What would you do if you saw a black man touching a white woman?"

"I believe the officer is a victim of a hate crime. When you have somebody being transported back to the precinct, telling the officer that's driving them to the precinct, 'What would you do if you saw a black man touching a white woman?' And these are the people now we're going to call victims here?" said O'Neill.

O'Neill said he takes issue that Haynes received a concussion and a black eye and the men responsible were not charged, but Haynes is now charged with assault for the off duty incident even though the men were not injured.

"Pete Holmes would not be charging him if he was Garth Haynes the plumber. He's Garth Haynes the police officer and he's seen on a video stepping on someone and causing no injury to them. Zero injury. And now, he's going to go through an entire trial," O'Neill said.

The attorney for the man who was kicked said even if racist remarks were made, it doesn't make Haynes' actions OK.

"If a plumber walked up, anybody walked up to Jake on the ground, handcuffed and kicked him in the head, he would have been arrested immediately," said Leary. "When someone is arrested and in custody and complying, officers are not entitled to get an extra shot, regardless of the situation, regardless of their feelings or frustrations."

The prosecutor's office said Haynes refused to talk to them about the case.

Haynes faces a maximum of one year in jail and a $5,000 fine if convicted of the gross misdemeanor. He is currently on administrative reassignment.

Haynes is the second Seattle police officer to be charged with assault this year.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 15 of 63

jdinkitsap said on July 10, 2011 at 2:07 PM

@ justaguy- Very well said- I couldn't agree more. The ARE paid very well and many of them should not be on the force. The fact that they had to extend there recruitment to out-of-state just to get enough shows that they will probably hire some losers who wouldn't have normally been hired if they had plenty of recruits to chose from. But, the dregs filter through and still have all the power they all possess.

70462412
Flag this comment

jdinkitsap said on July 10, 2011 at 2:01 PM

That's a bunch of C&@p that "Pete Holmes would not be charging him if he was Garth Haynes the plumber.". The police THEMSELVES would have arrested the plumber instantly!! The fact that the cop did it- they didn't even blink an eye and that is what this all boils down to. In fact, if it was a plumber involved, he wouldn't have even been allowed in the proximity of the three men. The fact that O'Neill is trying to justify police brutality is a perfect demonstration of the problem itself. That they feel outside the law itself and not applicable to its constraints clearly reveals their mindset here. This is the police leader himself saying police should be allowed to step on a man's head when he posses no possible threat. He is shooting himself- and all other cops- in the foot with that idiotic comment!

70462177
Flag this comment

otter814u said on July 10, 2011 at 6:25 AM

Sentenced, good. Why would anyone, especially a cop, think that it would be OK to kick someone who is on the ground. What is wrong with these guys? (The police) Does a "God" complex come with the badge?

70446031
Flag this comment

yessir said on July 9, 2011 at 7:22 PM

justaguy... I don't disagree with your sentiments... some people indeed should not be police officers.

70433567
Flag this comment

straydog33 said on July 9, 2011 at 6:46 PM

according to washington state law, kiking some one in the head is a class b felony, if a normal citizen were caught kicking someone who is allready sudued in the hed they would get charged with assult in the 2nd gegree, possible attemted murder if they were a minority or had a record

70432256
Flag this comment

calli said on July 9, 2011 at 3:22 PM

You know, the cops CHOOSE to be cops, a known dangerous and challenging profession. It pays well and can be exciting and satisfying. If the cops can't control themselves and accept the fact that they are going to be challenged and at times they HAVE to suck it up and deal with it. Many don't and abuse the badge. They don't have to be cops. If they can't handle being a cop, quit and sell shoes or work and Walmart. No excuses. Citizens are at the mercy of a cops discretion with mass amounts of authority and cops must conform to the challenge they face with integrity and honesty. If they can't do that, like I say, choose another profession.

70424121
Flag this comment

whatsyurbeef said on July 9, 2011 at 2:37 PM

It take a lot to get through to some. Some just got to learn the hard way.

70422957
Flag this comment

justaguy1267 said on July 9, 2011 at 12:46 PM

@yessir, I am niether simple minded nor easily manipulated if that is what you are implying. There certainly are some good cops out there, I've met them. I don't consider it extreme to shoot someone that say, starts waving a gun at a routine traffic stop. Cops get paid pretty well to do their jobs. They chose that work for many reasons and are not drafted or conscripted. I get irritated when they are always referred to as "heros" for doing their jobs! I believe that term is used very loosely in that context. Many people in many occupations don't recieve the recognition they deserve for going the extra mile in their work. It's not just cops! Please don't confuse me with being a lib, I believe many people deserve to get tazed, clubbed or in some cases shot for acting violently when interacting with police. But, beating or kicking individuals after they have been cuffed or otherwise subdued, is unacceptable and unprofessional! Some people shouldnt be cops!

70420126
Flag this comment

blackforge said on July 9, 2011 at 8:48 AM

Police in this state have the right to use force providing their is no malicious intent. This is well, good, proper and protects officers lives. The question of malicious intent does come up when a officer on or off duty kick a person that is handcuffed and laying on the ground. The officer also claimed it was done because of racial slurs. Is that not admitting to malicious intent? I would hope that a officer that is a victim of a crime when off duty. Acts and is treated like a civilian after on duty officers show up to sort things out and make arrest if needed. Having a off duty officer as victim of crime, helping with the arrest and any other part of the process that a civilian would never do. Is a conflict of interest. I do think this officer need his day in court to explain to his civilian peers why he had a right to kick this guy on the ground head. He may convince them their was a just reason for doing it. I'm just not seeing it in the video.

70411862
Flag this comment

mgchawkfan6421 said on July 9, 2011 at 8:15 AM

Humans are the smartest, and stupidest spicies on this planet at the same time. Give us authority, and we take advantage of it, but we also are responsible enough to make right decisions. Doesn't make sense? Or does it? Depends on how you look at it. Personally, i REALLY don't care.

70410596
Flag this comment

kairi0222 said on July 9, 2011 at 2:03 AM

i'm not understanding these sentencings stop talking like your in elementary school and quit the fighting get back on subject now what i was gonna say is oh shouldnt the three white men get charged well hell ya they beat an officer off duty of course but still thats a hate crime but two wrongs doesnt make it a right so charge the three white men with the hate crime and the officer with the the fourth degree assualt charge and oh by the way spd why dont you charge that one officer that cause suffiecent amount of damage to the wrongly accused man who is now needs support of the government excesive force is excesive force no need to push him into a wall and make him go into coma ok being a cop does not give you the right to push others around especially the innocent!!

70400652
Flag this comment

yessir said on July 9, 2011 at 12:08 AM

Mathias... I'm not a cop and wouldn't want to be. What do I know about them? I've stared a dead cop in the face who was shot to death who chose to try and calm and control a suspect rather than shoot him. He paid for it with his life. Newcastle... June 22, 2002. You can look it up if so inclined, but I was there. I don't consider that in-depth knowledge about "policing", but I'd sure call it first hand experience. As for "bad cops"... I've stated on these blogs more than once that such individuals should be prosecuted and held accountable, as should anyone engaged in criminal activity. In return I expect a reasonable view that all cops aren't bad, nor are most of them. Bloggers who live in the silly world of rhetoric and sweeping generalizations rapidly lose credibility with me. I don't surmise that cops are infallible... but I do respect the role they fill in our society and suspect many of them are good people doing the best job they can.

70398632
Flag this comment

matthias said on July 8, 2011 at 11:05 PM

yessir "you are in no majority my friend" "I" did not claim to be. "they are going to have a police department" I believe there should be a police department so good for that. "and they sure as heck aren't about to put someone like you in charge" Did I accidentally post my resume? Please if you are capable of learning take note of this, there is a difference between cop-haters and bad-cop-haters. I support those who are tasked to uphold the law. I do not support those who use their shield as a way to boost their already sorry lives. Now if you truly know so much about Policing as you portray then feel free to post how it is you are so well versed in the subject. I hope it is better than "i know a cop" or "I am related to a cop".

70397507
Flag this comment

yessir said on July 8, 2011 at 10:52 PM

or "angst" if you will (I added the 2nd post just for you!)

70397246
Flag this comment

yessir said on July 8, 2011 at 10:51 PM

Hippie... I'm just pleased I've captured your fancy ; )

70397232
Flag this comment

freedomthinker said on July 8, 2011 at 10:26 PM

"When someone is arrested and in custody and complying, officers are not entitled to get an extra shot, regardless of the situation, regardless of their feelings or frustrations." ^^this

70396711
Flag this comment

andyblue555 said on July 8, 2011 at 10:19 PM

andyblue555 avatar

jdtt1 , everything you said has nothing to do with an officer kicking a handcuffed man in the head while lying on the ground. It is an indefensible disgrace. Maybe your parents taught you by beating you. That is a shame. You would be begging a cop who smacked you to take you to jail? That is just strange and still has nothing to do with this case. Your not having "issues" with the law also has nothing to do with accountability and our officers being held to the same standards and laws that the rest of society is held to AS REQUIRED UNDER FEDERAL LAW.

70396532
Flag this comment

hippiescum said on July 8, 2011 at 10:15 PM

@yessir ---- Why do your posts have to come in twos? Does your attention deficit disorder prevent you form formulating a thought in one post?

70396457
Flag this comment

yessir said on July 8, 2011 at 10:08 PM

and hippie... regarding getting what I have coming to me? I'm doing quite well... Happy as all get out... so... yeah... keep it coming ; )

70396268
Flag this comment

yessir said on July 8, 2011 at 10:06 PM

LOL... apparantly I just did... Nutjob

70396198
Flag this comment

hippiescum said on July 8, 2011 at 9:20 PM

@yessir - I'm an "anti-government nut job" as you put it, but someone with the limited intellect that you have could not possibly rile me up. Just keep bending over and saying "yessir" and you'll get every thing you have coming to you.

70394962
Flag this comment

jdtt1 said on July 8, 2011 at 9:11 PM

Andyblue: That's the union. That's what they do. It's their job. You live in a state that promotes this (one letter hint..."D"). It's not O'Neill's fault. It's what he is supposed to do. You can't have it both ways. Okay...not you in particular, but you get the point. I don't think you would like my personal non smart-a** opinion of this particular incident though. I came from a place that wasn't as pu**ified as this area. If a cop woulda smacked me, I'd be begging him/her to take me to jail and not tell my parents I was such an a-hole that he/she smacked me...cause I woulda got it worse at home then had to write the cop an apology letter, maybe wash some patrol cars or something. Hey...maybe that's why I don't have issues with the law? Accepting personal responsibility, not whining and not being such a little b***h when things don't go my way...novel concept. Many people don't have "the man keepin them down"...cause they don't put themselves in that position.

70394637
Flag this comment

yessir said on July 8, 2011 at 7:37 PM

mathias... you are in no majority my friend... the people want those police officers on post.. yeah... they'll want them corrected when they are out of line, but make no mistake... they are going to have a police department... and they sure as heck aren't about to put someone like you in charge ; )

70390871
Flag this comment

yessir said on July 8, 2011 at 7:32 PM

If you knew how much I enjoy getting you anti-government nutjobs riled up... you'd never reply to me : )

70390622
Flag this comment

whatsyurbeef said on July 8, 2011 at 6:59 PM

You're bound to find a few bad apples in every barrel. This web site is a real good example. So Whats your Beef ?

70389254
Flag this comment

proudamerican said on July 8, 2011 at 6:30 PM

Hey Rich O'Neill, how about you lay on the ground handcuffed and I'll stomp on your head...

70387907
Flag this comment

cjcampbell said on July 8, 2011 at 6:23 PM

A disturbing story. While I think officers should be held accountable for their actions, the decision to let the three "men" who assaulted him get off without charges is terrible. They should be charged with assaulting an officer and a hate crime at the least.

70387616
Flag this comment

jdinkitsap said on July 8, 2011 at 6:06 PM

So, let me get this straight- the police union president is angry because he feels there is justification for stomping the head in of a handcuffed man who no longer posses a threat? That's just the boys in blue covering for each other again! I'm just happy there are cameras everywhere now and finally some of this is getting discovered. Police brutality is under scrutiny BIG TIME and the city attorney understands this. Its time for cops to finally get some of the punishment they deserve. The good cops will shine through & the bad ones will get filtered out. We need more cameras and more public disclosure. If the police union president is all for this kind of behavior, I say we start at the top (keep the camera on him) and work our way down!

70386806
Flag this comment

DimpleSkin said on July 8, 2011 at 5:37 PM

Actions unbecoming of an officer of the law, off duty or not. Remove him of his badge. That was a hate crime. He should have let the arresting officers handle the situation. That would never have been tolerated in New Orleans. LOL.

70385597
Flag this comment

jdtt1 said on July 8, 2011 at 5:36 PM

I'm also kinda wondering when some of the people who comment on here are going to jump over to the good cop stories (solved murders, found missing person, etc.) and comment? Why all the hatin'? I mean some people here only talk "bad cop this and bad cop that". Ya know...they do get murderers off the street and stuff too. Jump on over there and say "Good job". C'mon...it will make you feel better. Group hug

70385497
Flag this comment

andyblue555 said on July 8, 2011 at 5:35 PM

andyblue555 avatar

jdtt1 , unfortunately that is not what will happen. Under O'Neill's disgraceful leadership this officer will be advised not to plead guilty and the taxpayers will flip yet another HUGE lawyer's bill for defending the very police that commit these crimes. Over 10 million tax dollars spent to defend Seattle police in just ten years and counting. Lets close more schools and cut more services to pay for it. We will also need to raise taxes on homeowners. There is no way around that at this point.

70385471
Flag this comment

jdtt1 said on July 8, 2011 at 5:27 PM

The cop should just plead guilty. Who cares? He doesn't lose the right to carry a weapon, he has no prior crimes so he won't get any time, etc. If he did get time, it would be wrong because no one else does for fourth degree assault with no priors. He should be offered a plea bargain for maybe "attempted 4th degree assault" or something. Everyone else gets offered a plea...why not him? Prosecuting him to the fullest would be a little "discriminitory". He can pay his fine and go back to work. There is also a crime called "Disorderly Conduct" which part of that is using abusive language that creates a risk of assault, so it looks like the "victim" qualifies even if it's not a "hate crime". He should be charged and just plead guilty to that. Then they can both go to anger management classes together and talk about mistakes, loving one another, making good choices, etc. It will be a big ol' gigantic Seattle peace loving win-win. The cup is half full people. :)

70385157
Flag this comment

andyblue555 said on July 8, 2011 at 5:03 PM

andyblue555 avatar

Maybe one day the Seattle police will realize just how bad O'Neill makes them look. Until that day they also have to bare the shame of his comments as he threatens to sue the citizens of Seattle with the best attorney's the citizens of Seattle can buy whenever we try to hold them to any accountability. Haven't the Seattle police been embarrassed enough by this clown? The taxpayers sure have. He is nothing more than a bully displaying obvious small man syndrome time and time again.

70384228
Flag this comment

donmack37 said on July 8, 2011 at 4:37 PM

Good! Im sick of these pigs getting away with this B.S. And whats with the crying of " they were saying racist remarks? You'll learn in the anger managment classes that words are just that little piggie--WORDS! Not a reason to assult someone. OFF WITH HIS HEAD!

70383184
Flag this comment

seamikey said on July 8, 2011 at 4:15 PM

kboard306...completely agree. And, not just because you are a retired law enforcement officer. It all comes down to common sense, and the ability to control one's emotions. Obviously, the officer's co-workers had the situation under control, and the officer who was essentially a civilain at the time should have let them handle the situation. If a "hate crime" was committed, why didn't the off-duty officer call 9-1-1 at the first sign of trouble?

70382334
Flag this comment

wmdkitty said on July 8, 2011 at 4:11 PM

4th Degree assault? He's getting off light.

70382154
Flag this comment

nickc said on July 8, 2011 at 3:57 PM

Well if this video dose exist which at this point it's hearsay that's one thing, but he's a police officer he should of known better.

70381652
Flag this comment

matthias said on July 8, 2011 at 3:31 PM

Chuck, get out of the house you hermit. The fact that you mention spitting on the sidewalk allows for a an opportunity here. Police officers have what is called discretion over many of the things they choose to act on or ignore. For instance spitting on the sidewalk. Now if a cop is going to ticket you for such an act and you know it was completely his choice to do so and not his obligation, what does that say to you about that cop? The J-walking incident on Queen Anne as well. The cop decided not only to stop the individual for J-walking but then proceeded to escalate the incident which eventually led to a full on beating of the person. The result was an inquiry and investigation in which money, time and man power were lost. In addition the police lost even more confidence from the public. So Chuck, you think all that was lost was worth what would have been a small ticket at best? Or do you think maybe the officer should have used his discretion and avoided all that?

70380614
Flag this comment

kboard306 said on July 8, 2011 at 3:22 PM

I am a retired Deputy Sheriff, having retired in March of 2011. Sorry Officer O'Neill, there is no excuse for EVER assaulting a person who is handcuffed and on the ground, even if we are being called names. I never struck anyone who was handcuffed. I agree, we can still be hurt by a handcuffed person, but this incident is not one of those times, and for Officer Haynes to stomp on the offenders head is completely out of line. My department trained us to NEVER strike a person in the head unless it was a fight for your life, then all bets are off. Officer Haynes is, as are all police officers, expected to conduct themselves at a higher level than the average person. I understand we (officers and deputies) get mad at times, but we MUST not allow our emotions to dictate our actions. I think the city prosecutor is right in charging Officer Haynes with Assault 4th. With your attitude about these things now and in the past, I have to wonder if SPD is guilty of brutality.

70380267
Flag this comment

andiamotodd said on July 8, 2011 at 3:06 PM

The union is doing themselves a great disservice here. There simply is no justification for stomping a suspect in the head when they are handcuffed.

70379517
Flag this comment

goingnative1 said on July 8, 2011 at 2:52 PM

Once someone is hand cuffed and lying on the ground you can not stomp on there heads no matter if they are jerks or not, IMO.

70378887
Flag this comment

3012b said on July 8, 2011 at 2:45 PM

Well Seattle's leaders, idoits, are at it again. They are nothing but a joke.

70378561
Flag this comment

matthias said on July 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM

"Just because 10 are yelling in a single room, it doesn't make them the majority in the land" Just because 3 people are yelling the opposite of 10 does not make them the majority either. But if the Feds are investigating SPD and even surrounding police agencies are aware that SPD is VERY BAD then that should speak volumes to all the sheep everywhere.

70378401
Flag this comment

wolven said on July 8, 2011 at 2:41 PM

This is such bs. I don't care if the guy made a racist slur to the officer, law enforcement is paid to protect and serve!! What happened to leading by example?? He should have been the bigger man and let the slander roll of his back, NOT retaliated!! Then later the criminal could be charged with a 'hate crime' as well as whatever he was originally being charged with. Now, the criminal should be charged with a hate crime, the officer with a more severe punishment; assault and battery, and they BOTH should go to jail. A crime by a citizen to another citizen is ONE thing, but a crime by an officer of law enforcement against ANY citizen, criminal or not ... should have a more serious charge since the officer is supposed to be the bigger person.

70378307
Flag this comment

chuckstr76 said on July 8, 2011 at 2:20 PM

Wait till you get a $50 ticket for spitting on the sidewalk... and yes, there is a city that has this law, and yes it enforced....Enjoy your freedom of speech while you live here in the states...

70377262
Flag this comment

freedomfrank said on July 8, 2011 at 1:33 PM

There is no excuse on the face of this earth for kicking someone in the head when they are laid out on the ground in handcuffs. Thats why we have laws and judges. If the guy in handcuffs did something wrong let the courts have him, when the police stoop to their level it does nothing but further breakdown the relationship between us and the police.

70374532
Flag this comment

coyotebmw said on July 8, 2011 at 12:27 PM

Seems like the whole story may not be here. Just watched the followup story on KING 5 at Noon. The story indicated that the office might have been the target of racist behavior on the part of the three other men. Sounded like he was attacked for asking for his coat back from a Caucasian women, and the three Caucasian men took acceptation to a black man talking to a white woman. The three attackers were not aware that he was a police officer. But, in another video, that for some reason has not been released, the three white men are recorded as making racist remarks about the incident.

70370316
Flag this comment

freedomfrank said on July 8, 2011 at 12:22 PM

Not even a comment from you Yessir? Why do we need to praise those that do their jobs as they are intended? No different than the primadonnas in the NFL celebrating when they score a touchdown,, thats what they get paid to do so do it. Cops don't get paid to bash on people, its just further degradation of our society. Wanna live in a police state? MOVE to Czechoslovakia. This is America and we ain't gonna put up with it.

70369972
Flag this comment

yessir said on July 8, 2011 at 12:16 PM

justaguy... 1 bad apple only makes the whole barrel look rotten to the simple minded or easily manipulated (or those with agendas... be that anti-cop or anti-government as a whole) . Should police be held to a high standard? Yes, of course and they should be prosecuted if a crime has been committed. That said, not every single incident where a police officer struggles with, tazes, or shoots a suspect is a crime. To listen to some posters on here, every single police action is criminal, and such ascertations that "all the cops are in on it" only serves to disolve the credibility of the poster even further. I noticed an article a ways back that told of a Bellingham police officer involved in a very laudible program. In the accompanying news blog? Not a single comment. That says volumes about many of the frequent posters on these news-sites. Just because 10 are yelling in a single room, it doesn't make them the majority in the land.

70369627
Flag this comment

andyblue555 said on July 8, 2011 at 12:16 PM

andyblue555 avatar

CrichSeattle if those officers were held accountable rather than just paying settlement after settlement then the public would be able to tell the good from the bad. If we can not weed out the bad then they are all forced to carry the reputation of bad and are seen as such. They have been proven over and over to lie as a group to protect themselves over the rights of the citizens of Seattle and King County. They bring disgrace upon themselves as they threaten to sue the tax payers with the best lawyers the taxpayers can buy. Police unions have perverted our state laws to make pretty much anything they do legal while the taxpayers flip the bill for medical costs. When a nurse at Harborview says that she suspects more than 50% of all suspects who are escorted in are victims of overuse of force and no one is questioning this I think the problem is more widespread than anyone can even fathom. Fear of reporting and being seen as a trouble maker is a problem there apparently.

70369606
Flag this comment

paulharvey said on July 8, 2011 at 12:14 PM

"It’s unfortunate that one or two irresponsible officers spoil the reputation of those who actually do a good job." You mean one or two a week, just in this area. Now factor in the one's who haven't been caught yet, and the so-called "good" cops who just look the other way when their buddy stomps someone's head, and we have a whole more than "one or two". You can't be that naive.

70369491
Flag this comment

CrichSeattle said on July 8, 2011 at 11:41 AM

You may villify them, but who do you call when you need help? If you take a rookie and you put him on a force like the SPD, in the beginning he probably thinks that he got into law enforcement to help people. Pretty soon, he gets the idea that all the people he is out there helping hate him. Then it becomes us and "them". Guess who's the "Them"? We are: The people of this city and of these communities. I saw the video of a woman resisting a ticket who shoved a police officer. He ended up punching the woman, and the video was edited to make it look like he punched her for no reason. Some police officers are bad. We know this. However, if the media would stop biased reporting and editing video we could make our decisions based on facts and the results of investigations. That is why I watch Channel 5. They seem to be more fair and report facts not opinions. We need communities and law enforcement to work together.

70367397
Flag this comment

justaguy1267 said on July 8, 2011 at 10:54 AM

Stomping on someones head should be considered attempted murder. Pretend commandos like garth haynes should be thrown in with the general population in the KC jail and an announcement should be made who he is. Remember the cop at the Seatac jail who beat the 15 year old girl because he was "assaulted" with her flying flip flop? It's no wonder even the good cops have to watch their backs more now than they ever have. I hope the SPD one day realizes that one bad apple makes the whole barrel look rotten.

70364361
Flag this comment

freedomfrank said on July 8, 2011 at 9:51 AM

Lets not forget SPD detektive O'Neill (yes I spelled it wrong on purpose for the spelling police) was playing biker gang with his other cop buddies in Sturgis and shot the Hells Angel. I think thats when things started going down hill for the SPD. Why would you emulate the very people you are putting in prison? Then go to one of their hangouts and not expect trouble. Then on top, be drinking and having a gun on you? He didn't get in any trouble either. You can't be a cop and act like an outlaw.

70360171
Flag this comment

andyblue555 said on July 8, 2011 at 9:25 AM

andyblue555 avatar

One or two irresponsible officers?? Let me remind you that in every case that was on the news every single officer lied on their reports or made false statements. Remember the stomp video? Every officer's statements from the scene were reported NOT to coincide with the video. Look at Officer Lee who kicked the teen and kicked another outside in the head. He lied on his report. When John Williams was shot and killed downtown Ian Birks superiors omitted the part where he (Birk) wrote "He lunged at me with the knife" once witnesses came forward and stated otherwise. King County police are no better. The officer who pushed Christopher Harris into a wall downtown made false statement claiming he ran into a wall repeatedly to paramedics. The girl that was beaten in King County Jail. Both officers lied on their reports. Lies lies lies. How much do YOU think all these investigations, hospital bills and settlements REALLY add up to? Like I said, its time to raise taxes on Homeowners.

70358397
Flag this comment

matthias said on July 8, 2011 at 8:55 AM

"most of the people that comment here really have no clue what street life is like and live in their own little perfect world" Yes Chuck you do.

70356562
Flag this comment

chuckstr76 said on July 8, 2011 at 8:39 AM

It’s unfortunate that one or two irresponsible officers spoil the reputation of those who actually do a good job. But then again, most of the people that comment here really have no clue what street life is like and live in their own little perfect world…

70355617
Flag this comment

paulharvey said on July 8, 2011 at 8:35 AM

Drunk cops in bars with guns. Now there is an obvious policy change just waiting to happen. What's the rationale for this? That he might have to respond to a crime? What, while drunk?

70355342
Flag this comment

andyblue555 said on July 8, 2011 at 8:31 AM

andyblue555 avatar

Yet he is still a Seattle police officer. People should be warned before traveling to Seattle or King County. A king county jail guard almost killed a man and walked away with a misdemeanor after doctors and his own fellow guards testified against him. We need protection from our own Seattle and King County police but I doubt that help will never come. We need to raise taxes on homeowners to make up for all the lawsuits and settlements.

70355131
Flag this comment

matthias said on July 8, 2011 at 8:20 AM

Tootoo learn to read. The story says it is the second cop to be charged. That means it is not a single officer that is causing the problems genius. Additionally there are officers who have either been fired, disciplined or who are under investigation who eventually will be charged or fired. I am sure it makes you feel warm and fuzzy to believe that just because someone is an officer of the law, it is impossible for them to do something wrong but the sad truth is your super heroes are human and just as capable of acting irrational as the criminals they are supposed to pursue. Further more it is a fact that SPD in particular has an extremely difficult time attracting highly qualified individuals to become officers so they are forced to use lower standards when recruiting. Check the website for the requirements.

70354492
Flag this comment

stryker said on July 8, 2011 at 7:10 AM

To drunk to remember his coat and this thug is running around threatening and assaulting people. SPD is such an embarrassment.

70350112
Flag this comment

tootoo said on July 8, 2011 at 7:06 AM

In before neo-cons start judging every cop off the action of a single cop.

70349841
Flag this comment

freedomfrank said on July 8, 2011 at 6:56 AM

Good,,, another jackboot off the streets.

70349251
Flag this comment