Print
Email
Share

Washington ready to compete for possible new boeing jet

by GLENN FARLEY / KING 5 News

KING5.com

Posted on June 8, 2011 at 7:41 PM

Updated Wednesday, Jun 8 at 10:11 PM

RENTON, Wash. -- Governor Gregoire makes it clear the state intends to compete hard for the new Boeing jet that will replace the 737.   

Boeing's Renton plant is home to the world's most popular airliner, the 737.  The plane is so popular, Boeing has three assembly lines building them at the rate of over one new jet a day. And soon they'll make them even faster. 
 
To stay ahead of Airbus, Boeing is seriously looking at replacing the 737 with an all new, plastic composite jet built on a new type of production system.
 
But, the big question is whether the new jet will be built in Renton or even within Washington state.
 
"We're going to hit the ground running, no matter what the competition is," Governor Christine Gregoire said.
 
Washington has been down this road before.  Back in 2003, then Governor Gary Locke, launched Operation Olympus to get Boeing to put the 787 Dreamliner here.  
 
The Dreamliner stayed in Washington, but could've gone to Kingston, North Carolina. 
 
And as it turns out a second 787 Assembly line will open this Friday near Charleston, S.C.
 
The man just appointed to keep the 737 at home is Attorney Tayloe Washburn.  Washburn played a major role in helping the state win the $35 billion dollar Air Force tanker deal over Alabama. 
 
"Everyone recognizes that for the next 9 months this is a one state effort. And we're all going to pull our resources to get it done," said Washburn.  
 
In what's now named Operation Pegasus, Washburn and a team that will soon be assembled will fill a book with data on other states that are sure to jump into any race.
 
It's a little early to know which is going to rise to the top if there's a national competition. 
 
Boeing hasn't even decided yet, whether it's even going to go ahead and build a full on replacement for the 737.  It could choose just to put higher efficiency engines onto the existing model. But we should have more clarity on what it's going to do by the end of this year.
 
 
 

 

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 3 of 3

lsmith5870400119 said on June 15, 2011 at 7:12 PM

Look at the bright side Seattle. You won't have much traffic congestion when boeing pulls out, and they will.

69091044
Flag this comment

mount1si1grad said on June 9, 2011 at 2:27 PM

Rattler they were going to agree to a 10 year no strike deal in the puget sound area, but it came too late. So if I was them I would say so long as you get the average or above raise for the local aerospace workers you have to agree not to strike. They might have the union in on it for reasons of safety.

68702574
Flag this comment

Rattler said on June 9, 2011 at 1:00 PM

It will never happen. The machinists union will strike as soon as it becomes a potential commercial success. It will cost the shareholders billions. Given the history of the Rivet Monkey Union...Boeing would be negligent to the shareholders to not seek out a more stable work force environment. All of the second tier suppliers would also prefer to locate in a right to work state.

68696739
Flag this comment