Print
Email
Share

Boeing wins $35 billion Air Force tanker contract

by GLENN FARLEY / KING 5 News and Associated Press

KING5.com

Posted on February 24, 2011 at 3:11 PM

Updated Thursday, Feb 24 at 7:02 PM

SEATTLE – Boeing has been awarded a $35 billion contract by The Pentagon to replace the Air Force's fleet of aging mid-air refueling tankers. It's news Boeing has been waiting to hear for a decade.

Boeing was pitting its 767 against Airbus' 330 for the deal for 179 jets.

The actual airplane will be built in Everett, Wash., with tanker modifications refueling boom and other military modifications made in Wichita, Kan with support from several other states.

Without the 767 tanker, the assembly line in Everett could have slowly closed down over the next three or five years. Airlines are largely switching over to the new  787. The tanker keeps this line open for decades to come.

Washington's Congressional delegation is happy and relieved.

"We are finally at a place where we know that the Air Force is going to be having their tankers built by American workers at a time when our economy needs it. It's good for today, but it's also good for our national security far into the future," said Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash.

"I am so excited that we finally won this after three go-arounds," said Rep. Norn Dicks. "It's just the most important victory for Boeing, for the workers of our state."

For years, the delegation fought to make The Pentagon pay attention to just how much more it would cost to fly and maintain the larger Airbus 330.

In 2008, the Pentagon picked the Airbus jet, only to have that decision overturned.

The economic implications for Puget Sound are far-reaching.

"The supply chain that is over 100,000 people in Puget Sound will continue to build the parts and services that go along with those defense contracts," said Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash.

Had Boeing lost, the next political battle would have been to ramp up the issue of subsidies – billions of dollars in European government payments that got the A330 into the air.

Subsidized or not, Boeing still beat the Airbus jet on price.

"This is a generational victory for what Boeing means and for what we do here in the state of Washington," said Rep. Jay Inslee, D-Wash.

The $35 billion could amount to a mere first installment on a $100 billion deal if the Air Force pushes ahead and buys more tankers.

It's not clear yet whether Airbus will protest the decision.

Through the years, the Air Force's efforts to award the contract have been undone by Pentagon bungling and the criminal conviction of a top Defense Department official.

In 2008, the Government Accountability Office upheld Boeing's protest of the tanker contract to Northrop and EADS, saying it found "a number of significant errors" in the Air Force's decision, including its failure to fairly judge the relative merits of each proposal.

The Air Force reopened the bidding in 2010 only to be embarrassed again as it mistakenly gave Boeing and EADS sensitive information that contained each other's confidential bids.

“The thorough and transparent selection process was marked by continual dialogue with offerors to ensure the Air Force had a clear understanding of their proposals and the companies clearly understood the service's analysis of their offers,” said Michael Donley, Secretary of the Air Force.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 15 of 30

davebrownspoint said on February 25, 2011 at 8:08 AM

Hey people, Boeing won on price! No conspiracy-theory whining like the Senator from Airbus, Richard Shelby did, saying it must have been "Chicago politics." Boeing won fair & square based on requirements and price. End of (lame) arguments.

61385771
Flag this comment

gablestout said on February 25, 2011 at 1:28 AM

Bellevuetom- instead of using "a guy at Boeing" as your source, why don't you actually read the Boeing proposal and the USAF's RFP?. Boeing just retooled their 767 production line in Everett using Lean Techniques to cut production costs down and make more room for the 787 line, and that assembly line's per plane cost is the one referenced in their proposal. In addition, Boeing expects the new line to be capable of producing at least 2 767s per month. Boeing has only manufactured an average of one 767/mo since 2004. This suggests intent to add additional production. The first KC-46 is expected to fly in 2015, giving Boeing 2 years to build the remaining 17. Given that the Air Forces KC-X Final RFP calls for a production level of 15 aircraft per year, this falls in line with the utilization of existing facilities at Everett. Moving the entire line to SC would be wasteful, as would building a second 767 assembly line in SC, given the projected demand for the airframe.

61369673
Flag this comment

charleylechein said on February 24, 2011 at 10:46 PM

This is great news, not only for the BOEING company, but for everyone in the PugetSound. How so? Trickel down theory. You pay workers to biuld the planes, they inturn spend money like for groceries and on the higner end go out for dinner, and then those people that worked in the service industries have more money and it goes on and on. Also, the state collects more money from taxes and softens the loss of income by a one percent or two or even three..... I wish I worked in a business or for a business that was a partner in this, but Im not... I hope that BOEING sees this as a means to get back to the basics, thats building planes here in the USA. After all, thats what the congressional delgation pushed... So, throse out any ideas of OUTSOURCING parts or anything to copmanies that are NOT in the USA, do not consider OUTSOURCING to ITALY, CHINA, EUROPE, and maybe stop OUTSOURCING to the STATE of SOUTH CAROLINA because of the 787. Learn from mistakes, never repeat them.

61365561
Flag this comment

calli said on February 24, 2011 at 7:25 PM

I just hope that Washington State does whatever they have to do to get business' into the sate. If it's big time tax breaks, so be it. Business means jobs. Jobs means money, especially good paying jobs.

61355443
Flag this comment

hourforum said on February 24, 2011 at 6:54 PM

shoreline exactly!! Boeing sends jobs overseas too often, gets tax breaks, does as little in Washington state as they can. Yet millions of dollars in reduced taxes. The good ol american enterprise at work

61353118
Flag this comment

shoreline said on February 24, 2011 at 6:26 PM

Yeah... you're BRILLIANT hourforum! Raise taxes on Boeing for outsourcing jobs... Of course THAT won't last long when Boeing decides to outsource it's entire Washington workload right on down to South Carolina. No more presence in WA means no more taxes in WA. Washington State better become more business friendly because that small little snowball has started rolling downhill.

61351421
Flag this comment

hourforum said on February 24, 2011 at 5:43 PM

To Boeing-Start looking where you guys can outsource the jobs. China, england,Japan,Korea,Cuba,Alaska!!! The sooner you guys start looking at where you can ship jobs off to the more of that cash you can hold!!! doesn't that sound like Boeing? I think the state of washington should raise taxes on Boeing, in part because they outsource jobs that can be done here at home. The state made a deal in taxes for Boeing just to keep them here.., Well-, now that Boeing is doing good, if they outsource jobs- they should pay a fine. CHA CHING OLYMPIA are you listening?

61348738
Flag this comment

puyallup said on February 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM

As a child in the 50's I was taken all around the nation on a train. I thought about repeating that and found trains now are mostly point to point commuter trains. When you see what Japan, China, and Europe have done with trains, I wish Boeing was building hi-tech trains instead.

61348523
Flag this comment

bellevuetom said on February 24, 2011 at 5:39 PM

Glenn....dont report news that is incorrect. I spoke to a friend of mine at the Boeing plant in Everett. Everett MAY or MAY NOT build the actual plane..or it may go to SC. It has NOT BEEN DETERMINED yet. Come on, you are a professional!

61348453
Flag this comment

tandori said on February 24, 2011 at 5:21 PM

It irks me that this is advertised as a victory of working men and women of Washington. No, it is actually a victory for workers in India, Russia, and China. Boeing outsources all its software development and other manufacturing overseas to save a nickel. How is that going to help the Washington State economy? I don't get it.

61347258
Flag this comment

siusir said on February 24, 2011 at 4:56 PM

Kendianne, wasn't this outdated argument made in the 50's? You've been in your house way too long. Get out more often. BTW, you still need a car to get around; the Jetson's flying saucer is still not available yet.

61345892
Flag this comment

silverton said on February 24, 2011 at 4:54 PM

The response to this news is best stated by President Eisenhower. Watch his final address to the nation on you tube.

61345783
Flag this comment

gablestout said on February 24, 2011 at 4:48 PM

Quit being a killjoy, countrygurl3. That's my job. Yes, Boeing has only been awarded Phase 1, design and engineering of 18 KC-46s. HOWEVER, the Phase 2 and 3 contracts are non-competitive and the Air Force does not include continued lifespan extensions a viable alternative to a drasticly reduced KC-46 fleet. This will be an easy aircraft for Boeing to build, since it is based off of an existing airframe, and boeing has the experience of the KC-135 fleet WRT refueler fittings.

61345327
Flag this comment

jonsmith said on February 24, 2011 at 4:45 PM

My, oh my. The liberals in MY family helped fly the B-17 and build the B-29. KBBCOOP should be ashamed...js

61345171
Flag this comment

kbbcoop said on February 24, 2011 at 4:37 PM

EADS will protest, this isnt over yet unfortunately. The liberals in our government who hate America must be fuming Boeing won this.

61344561
Flag this comment

molly2007 said on February 24, 2011 at 4:19 PM

Congrats Boeing. I'm happy our service men and women will be in an American Made aircraft. EADS (European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co, was formed in 2000???? Headquartered out of Leiden, Netherlands. Boeing, founded in Seattle Washington, United States of America in 1916, headquartered in Chicago, Illionis, also in the United States. I have family in the military and by God, I want them flying American. Thank you, thank you..... I'll sleep better tonite.

61343223
Flag this comment

countrygurl3 said on February 24, 2011 at 4:08 PM

To clarify, Boeing did not win "$35 Billion". They won phase one of a three phase contract. Phase one is $3.5 Billion, the next two phases are the remainder of the $35 Billion, which Boeing is not guaranteed. The ADDITIONAL 100 Billion is service and maintenance contracts.

61342173
Flag this comment

cyrixlord said on February 24, 2011 at 4:03 PM

Oh, and while all the legal rangling continues for over a decade now, we still don't have a tanker replacement.

61341773
Flag this comment

collegeguy said on February 24, 2011 at 4:02 PM

Kendianne, do you want some cheese to go with your whine? Manned aircraft will be fighting in many more wars to come.

61341707
Flag this comment

cyrixlord said on February 24, 2011 at 4:02 PM

Ah, the 11 year back-and-forth match continues between US subsidy laced boeing and European subsidy laced airbus. Then the appeals, then the reversals then the re-issuing of awards . Meanwhile, the accusations of who is subsidised more continue to bounce around the legal system.

61341686
Flag this comment

21garion said on February 24, 2011 at 3:58 PM

No one ever mentioned that it would cost the taxpayer over 8 billion dollars to refit all tha bases for tanker maintainence an runways to be made longer for a larger plane. Both the news media and the Pentagon somehow seemed to omit that fact. And to mention that EADS is famous for undercutting bids and bribing officials and then not delivering on time. Read the Aviation tabloids as this is a fact. Boeing and the US taypayer deserve this contract.

61341442
Flag this comment

aconfusedazn6592 said on February 24, 2011 at 3:53 PM

3.5bil is a little different than 35 billion

61341022
Flag this comment

speeadork said on February 24, 2011 at 3:47 PM

I don't agree with Norm on many issues but I can say thank you to all the hard work that he and other state politicians have done over the past few years to help keep American jobs in place. THANK YOU...

61340567
Flag this comment

kendianne said on February 24, 2011 at 3:42 PM

If we MUST build these airplanes, sure I support Boeing getting this contract. But it is a HUGE waste of money. We do NOT need ANY tankers. The next war will be fought with drones and missiles, NOT manned airplanes. And IF we NEED manned airplanes, we have an outfit called the U.S. Navy that has 11 supercarriers each ONE of which has 90 supersonic Super Hornets on it. That is 1000 airplanes! But it does create a LOT of jobs............all on the taxpayers dime. What a waste of money.

61340128
Flag this comment

freedomfrank said on February 24, 2011 at 3:37 PM

In my best Gomer Pyle voice,, Surprise surprise surprise,,,,

61339782
Flag this comment

countrygurl3 said on February 24, 2011 at 3:36 PM

I really really hope EADS does not file a protest. Our Service Men and Women need a safe reliable tanker.

61339757
Flag this comment

banditrider said on February 24, 2011 at 3:27 PM

Great news, now I don't have to get upset. The EADS deal never added up. Building a new factory , new workers, and a larger plane? There were hidden surprises here. The Boeing deal is smart. Proven aircraft and design, able to share parts with the civilian 767, and current hangars and airfields can be used.

61338957
Flag this comment

yogibear said on February 24, 2011 at 3:23 PM

Good.

61338597
Flag this comment

think said on February 24, 2011 at 3:20 PM

It's about time that our elected representatives stop playing global-politics and keep our defense-related procurements in-house. Good for American jobs, good for American tax-payers and good for America!

61338358
Flag this comment

peterl643 said on February 24, 2011 at 3:15 PM

Being a WA resident I'm not sure....does 2 out of 3 wins actually mean a win? Recent history in this state definitely confuses me!

61337843
Flag this comment