Print
Email
Share

Seattle competing for grant to build city-owned 4G network

by GLENN FARLEY / KING 5 News

KING5.com

Posted on August 23, 2010 at 6:27 PM

SEATTLE - You've seen them on TV - video from police car dash cameras. And while it's digital, dash-cam video isn't broadcasting live. But that could soon change.

Imagine a dash camera able to feed live video of earthquake damage or a terror attack into the city's emergency operations center as it happens.

A lot of our Broadband access is still pretty much dependent on wires. What the city wants to do is take a lot of what we're going when we're plugged in and put it over the air.

"This would be a 4th generation network. It would be high speed. It would allow two-way transmission of things like video - video from police vehicles, fire apparatus or similar things," said Bill Schrier, Seattle Chief Technology Officer.

Schrier is out to win the city a $17 million federal grant to build a city-owned 4G network.

Even cameras that send video from the streets over fiber-optic lines could send better pictures over the air.

But in a world where we can connect video wirelessly over smart phones now, what's the big deal?

"It's slow and kind of jerky," said Shrier.

He says this would be smoother, more dependable and high definition.

While the system would use commercial technology, the network would be exclusive for city use. Cell sites would be mounted in places including fire stations with backup power. It would couple to upgraded 911 centers that could send that video back out.

"So you could take a picture of somebody committing a crime, and it could be to responding police vehicles within seconds of the time that you send it to 911," he said.

Seattle will find out if it wins the Department of Commerce grant by the end of next month. Sixteen other cities are competing for the grant money.

Print
Email
Share

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 6 of 6

2cents said on August 24, 2010 at 6:36 AM

Waste of money, huge security risk and privacy issues. Sounds half-baked to me.

50492381
Flag this comment

tootoo said on August 24, 2010 at 4:44 AM

But when they take profits from the honest, hard working cell phone companies, who will be able to pay to get Dino Rossi into office so he can then funnel tons of money to them?

50482809
Flag this comment

blankingout said on August 23, 2010 at 9:50 PM

The first place they need to put live cameras in are the WSP cars, especially their "Stalker and Entrap" unmarked cars... and stream online as a freedom of information. Then also make it so the driver has no control over the camera video or audio. There should be a HUD display for the camera viewer that displays the WSPs car speed and whether the car has it's emergency lights engaged; cause non-emergency speeding is still against the law (for all you black and white law lovers).

50470441
Flag this comment

3gpplte said on August 23, 2010 at 8:33 PM

One more comment, sending live video or sending a message on event of emergency is possible through M2M technology not 4G. These two are not related. M2M is possible through existing HSDPA 3G network. Do your homework first before competing for grant....

50468409
Flag this comment

3gpplte said on August 23, 2010 at 8:27 PM

Okay my mistake, it is federal grant. Regardsless it is free money, it is awful way to waste money. Put WIFI router all over the city. That is the way it should be done.

50468211
Flag this comment

3gpplte said on August 23, 2010 at 8:17 PM

This is ridiculous way to waste already depleted state budget. Everyone in telco business knows that WIFI is competing technology for what Schriner called "4G network" which are basically 3G LTE and WIMAX network. It is very expensive comparing to WIFI network, but it does litlle more than WIFI. Big city like Seattle, WIFI is better choice. Why would anyone waste money on half cooked "4G network" now, if you wait a couple of more years, Femto cell 4G network will be available that support more bandwidth and way cheper price. Don't waste money on "4G network", save money for public education, DSHS, police men, and fire fighters, seriously please!!!!

50467866
Flag this comment

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?

Register Now

Member Benefits

Link your account to your Twitter or Facebook account for easier login!

Link your account to your Facebook profile Link your account to your Twitter profile

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

* - Indicates required field

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

Connecting to

You may need to allow pop up window for this step of registration

Just one more step:

Please take a moment to review the available e-mail newsletters has to offer. Place a checkbox next to the newsletters you wish to subscribe to.

Welcome.

Thank you for becoming a member of KING5.com. You now have full access to the best local coverage and late breaking news from KING5.com. Soon you will be redirected to the page you were seeking, and a confirmation email will be delivered to you.

You will need to respond to the confirmation e-mail for your account to be activated.

KING5.com is dedicated to bringing you exceptional news and outstanding information services, all while personalizing it to your liking. We're sure you'll enjoy being a KING5.com member! If you need assistance, please contact us.