Print
Email
Share

New study claims cell phone laws don't work

by ELISA HAHN / KING 5 News

Bio | Email

KING5.com

Posted on January 28, 2010 at 10:34 PM

SEATTLE - As states across the country, including Washington, ban cell phone use and texting while driving, a new study finds that those statutes have failed to reduce crashes. It's the first look at crashes in states with laws against hand-held cellphone use for drivers.

The new study, by the Institute of Highway Loss Data, has some puzzling results. It found that laws banning their use while behind the wheel have not led to fewer crashes.

"We do know laws, at least the hand-held bans, are working to reduce the number of people who are talking on their hand-held phone, but we don't see a comparable reduction in crashes," says Adrian Lund of the Highway Loss Data Institute. "In fact, we see no effect."

The Highway Loss Data research compared insurance claims for crash damage in four jurisdictions before and after bans were enacted in California, New York, Connecticut, and Washington, DC. Data was also collected in nearby areas without bans.

The findings are contrary to a nationwide push to get drivers to put down their phone. Close to 20 states, including Washington, have passed no texting laws or put restrictions on cell phone use while driving. And starting this week, big federal fines on any driver of a large truck or bus caught sending or reading text messages behind the wheel.

Those researchers are trying to figure out why their findings don't match up with what we already know about the risk.

The president of the Highway Loss Data Institute will present the information to the Society of Automotive Engineers in Washington, D.C., Friday.

Print
Email
Share

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 15 of 21

peadge said on April 28, 2010 at 6:42 PM

This sure doesn't sound like a very scientific study! Making a law does little to change behavior. ENFORCING the law is what causes change. How about we start enforcing the law? Every day I see a dozen or more people driving like idiots talking on cell phones, not using turn signals, not stopping at stop signs, stopping at greeen lights and turning left from the far right lane. Are law officers told not to enforce this law or what? What we (people who obey the law) need is a device in our vehicles that jams cell phone signals. We could just drive with in on all the time, or just turn it on when we see someone breaking this law. ;-)

42199302
Flag this comment

lonestarss said on January 29, 2010 at 10:04 PM

How bout they just make a law that states, You must have both hands on the wheel, except while shifting. I see so many drivers on the road, looking back talking to their kids/passengers, eating, shaving, putting on makeup, reading the newspaper, messing with their radio, not using turn signals during lane changes, cell phones shouldn't be the only cause here. The reason we learn to be defensive drivers is because of all the careless drivers on the road.

36658162
Flag this comment

sunnyseattle said on January 29, 2010 at 3:32 PM

hang up and drive

36640952
Flag this comment

mackd said on January 29, 2010 at 2:07 PM

I continually seem to be in the minority. I belive the laws are too narrow and it has nothing to do with cell phones and everything to do with "anything that causes a distraction to the driver." However I have recently decided to "play by their rules" and not talk on the cell phone while driving. So yesterday I went to taco bell and got an 89cent 5 layer burrito. Trying to eat that while driving was one hell of a challange... and probably dangerous to others. But hey... at least im not breaking the law!!!

36635872
Flag this comment

bbas44 said on January 29, 2010 at 2:05 PM

Duh, It took a study to reveal the obvious. How much did the study cost? bmeyer

36635739
Flag this comment

coolblue9 said on January 29, 2010 at 1:54 PM

Collegeguy...the study is based upon statistics from state collision reports that are completed by police officers upon investigating collisions. Just like here in Washington, those reports note causal factors such as the driver being distracted as well as how they were distracted. Drivers are less likely to admit to a police officer about cell phone use during a collision because they will be ticketed for that. So the statistics show "X" number of collisions occurred. If drivers were untruthful regarding cell phone use during the investigation before and after the law went into effect then you cannot say that the law had an effect on collision reduction or not. The data is not reliable enough to make that conclusion.

36635004
Flag this comment

chuckstr76 said on January 29, 2010 at 11:54 AM

Play nice there Mr. chevelle70ss. He's not the only peron posting who has poor command of the english language. There are so many more out there.

36625887
Flag this comment

chevelle70ss said on January 29, 2010 at 10:59 AM

nickc, you might want to take a grammer class before you post your comments. Your opinion doesnt really matter if it doesnt make sense. On another note ban everything while we are at it, might as well ban thinking because that can be distracting too.

36621842
Flag this comment

nickc said on January 29, 2010 at 9:43 AM

Sounds to me like three data is incomplete. A total band of cell phone or car phone across the country is what is needed and why where at it ban eating and the consuming of any beverage of any type because that is just as dangerous. There is a reason they call it driving. If you want to talk on the phone, text or consume food or beverage get off the road first.

36615154
Flag this comment

wawolf said on January 29, 2010 at 9:28 AM

Studies have proven that it's the act of talking on the phone that distracts drivers. It doesn't matter that much whether it's a handheld or BT device they are talking into. Really talking on cell phones while driving should be banned, but that will never happen.

36613812
Flag this comment

bazwest said on January 29, 2010 at 8:15 AM

Clearly cell phone use continues to grow and thus, while a few good citizens may be deterred enough by the law to change their cell phone behaviors, there are plenty who simply step into the role of scofflaw.

36607407
Flag this comment

milleramerican85 said on January 29, 2010 at 8:05 AM

How much you wanna bet this study was paid for by the cell phone lobby? Any law that puts your eyes and attention back on the road is a good thing. They should also ban those other things that are a major distraction like eating, make-up, video players in the drivers view, etc. For the record, I was rear- ended by a girl talking on a cell phone a few years ago. You will not sell me on letting this one go!

36606534
Flag this comment

chuckstr76 said on January 29, 2010 at 7:09 AM

Go Figure, it took a study to realize this? Just stand at a street corner and watch people driving, easily 25% of the poeple are on the phone, turning, shifting and bs'n on the phone.

36601904
Flag this comment

logic14 said on January 29, 2010 at 6:59 AM

Soft judges, too few police, and a basic selfish attitude explains this. What are these people talking about that wasn't around 40 years ago. Everyone should ask themselves "Is this phone call necessary?" I am so tired of the cellular phone superceding everything. When someone answers their phone while talking to me, I simply walk away. Social grace no longer exists. People rather kill each other than hang up the phone. It is the classic opinion that such things happen to others and not me.

36601027
Flag this comment

stryker said on January 29, 2010 at 6:43 AM

I dont have time to talk on the phone while driving, Im to busy texting.

36599802
Flag this comment

aziza said on January 29, 2010 at 6:36 AM

That says it all folks! The laws are no good and while we are at it, lets lift the Driving while intoxicated laws too since that doesn't seem to work either! Let's just have anarchy out on the roads! (I'm being facetious). Driving is not a right and people who abuse it need to have their licenses revoked. Plain and simple.

36599294
Flag this comment

collegeguy said on January 29, 2010 at 6:35 AM

wittyname, read the law, emergancy workers are allowed to use their cell and so are a few industries that need the cell to talk to their dispatchers. coolblue9, really? And how do you know this? This study is not flawed because what they are saying is that there are still just as many accidents on the road either way, passing laws against cell phone use has NOT cause the rates to drop. And yes, more people will be more truthful when answering the study because they can't get in trouble, and besides, playing with your radio will get you a ticket just as fast as using your cell phone since there are already distracted driving laws on the book that cover cell, radio, make-up and any other distraction you might have that leads to an accident. So please, don't post out of your failed opinion.

36599262
Flag this comment

factoid said on January 29, 2010 at 6:35 AM

This study just backs up other studies that show the same thing. It is the conversation, not the device that distracts drivers in most instances. But the State wants more money, so we will probably see the bill pass.

36599182
Flag this comment

coolblue9 said on January 29, 2010 at 6:04 AM

The data from this study is flawed. It is dependent on people admitting they were using a hand held cell phone at the time of their collision. Nobody will ever do that. They will be more willing to say they were messing with their radio than talking on their phone. The data from all studies regarding cell phone use are unreliable because of this.

36596852
Flag this comment

wittyname said on January 29, 2010 at 2:12 AM

And what do they find when looking for a cop? Law enforcement officials driving while they are chatting it up with their cellphones to their ears.

36588677
Flag this comment

blankingout said on January 29, 2010 at 1:06 AM

No kidding, people now are doing the opposite, once holding the phone at road level by the steering wheel, now people are hiding the cellphone and now have to look away from the road to text... MUCH WORSE! Focus now is diverted from the road to looking around for a cop. Also bad for road safety.

36587849
Flag this comment

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?

Register Now

Member Benefits

Link your account to your Twitter or Facebook account for easier login!

Link your account to your Facebook profile Link your account to your Twitter profile

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

* - Indicates required field

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

Connecting to

You may need to allow pop up window for this step of registration

Just one more step:

Please take a moment to review the available e-mail newsletters has to offer. Place a checkbox next to the newsletters you wish to subscribe to.

Welcome.

Thank you for becoming a member of KING5.com. You now have full access to the best local coverage and late breaking news from KING5.com. Soon you will be redirected to the page you were seeking, and a confirmation email will be delivered to you.

You will need to respond to the confirmation e-mail for your account to be activated.

KING5.com is dedicated to bringing you exceptional news and outstanding information services, all while personalizing it to your liking. We're sure you'll enjoy being a KING5.com member! If you need assistance, please contact us.