Print
Email
Share

Stabbing in anger management class prompts lawsuit

by LINDA BYRON / KING 5 News

KING5.com

Posted on December 5, 2011 at 11:00 PM

Updated Tuesday, Dec 6 at 12:08 AM

ISSAQUAH, Wash. -- Luna Oraivej, 37, admits she got angry and broke a DVD player during an argument at home.

“I was wrong, I did something wrong,” Oraivej said. “I was being honest with police. I said ‘Yes, I stepped on it,’ but nobody touched each other, there was no physical violence.”
 
Because it was a domestic violence dispute, Issaquah Police arrested Oraivej for malicious mischief.
 
“When he [the officer] told me I had to go to jail for that, it really took me by surprise,” Oraivej said.
 
Oraivej was booked into the city jail and charged with a criminal misdemeanor. Her attorney and the prosecutor worked out a deal and when she got to court, the judge informed Oraivej that there was a way to make the criminal charge go away -- pay a fine and attend anger management classes.
 
Oraivej said on her way out of court, she picked up paperwork from a judicial clerk directing her to Court Services Institute. She said she thought it was a court sponsored program and she wasn’t given any other options.
 
“No, I was given this one place, this one number, call them up and they’ll tell you when to show up,” Oraivej said.
 
Oraivej said that she made the call and paid $180 for two all day classes to be held in a Bellevue office building. 
 
The first class went fine. But during the second class, the instructor popped in a Dr. Phil DVD. It was supposed to inspire students to control their emotions, but it had the opposite effect for one 19-year-old student.
 
Oraivej said the teen began yelling: “What the [expletive] does this have to do with my life?” 
 
Oraivej said that the instructor didn’t react, so she spoke up. “And I said, ‘Babe, it’s a really good show, just give it a chance,’ and right away she was like, "[Expletive] I know you ain’t talking to me like that.’”
 
Oraivej said that’s when the teen got out of her seat and lunged at her.

“She came in this way and hit me twice,” Oraivej said. “I moved back in a little bit like this to cock my arm away from her, and that’s when she caught me that third time.”
 
Oraivej had been stabbed with a paring knife. There were holes in her sweatshirt and a gash in her right shoulder.
 
“I just kept saying, ‘Oh, my God, I can’t believe she just stabbed me. She just stabbed me,” Oraivej said.
 
That’s when the instructor took the attacker out of the room and down to the lobby.
 
“And I was left there holding my arm and trying to dial 911 on my cell phone with blood streaming down my arm, dripping on the floor,” Oraivej said.
 
The aftermath was caught on a cell phone camera by a witness who was in the same building attending a different class.
 
The video shows the attacker, later identified as Faribah Maradiaga, sitting in the lobby swearing and muttering threats. 
 
Oraivej can be heard talking to the 911 operator. The instructor also called. Then police arrive and take over. A police officer is heard yelling at Maradiaga, “Bellevue Police, come out of the building now. Put up your hands.”
 
Maradiaga complied and was taken into custody. According to police, Maradiaga later signed a written statement explaining her actions: “The girl made a threat comment to me and I blew up out of control and tried hitting her stabbed her and then I was arrested.”
 
After the teen was taken away by police, Oraivej said she had to stay and finish class. She said the instructor told her, “We won’t be too much longer, I just have a few more things to cover with you and then you can go.”
 
Oraivej said she needed the certificate to present to the court. After she finished the class she said she drove herself to the emergency room to get the gash in her shoulder stitched up.
 
And she hired a lawyer. Attorney Andrew Ackley said that he did some digging and learned that “Court Services Institute” is not a court-sponsored program, but a private for-profit company. He said he also learned that Maradiaga had a history of violent outbursts before that day, including an attack on a high school principal.
 
The King County Prosecutor’s Office charged Maradiaga with the assault on Oraivej but the teen failed to show up for court and there is now a felony warrant out for her arrest.
 
“There’s really no excuse for someone being stabbed in an anger management class. It clearly didn’t come out of nowhere,” said Ackley.
 
Anger management programs are not certified in the state of Washington so there are no minimum standards for how they’re taught. Dr. Marsha Linehan, U.W. Professor of Psychology and an expert on anger management, thinks that’s a problem.
 
“As long as you have people who can manage a group of people with anger problems running the show it can be safe and effective,” she said. “Obviously, you would want to first be sure that people don’t bring weapons in.”
 
Oraivej said the class did teach her one thing: “Up until this point, I really didn’t know what the word ‘ironic’ meant. Now I know.”
 
Oraivej said that her own anger is gone, but it’s been replaced by fear and a lingering anxiety. She said she can’t forget Maradiaga’s threats.

“It doesn’t go away, you know. Just hearing somebody tell you that they’re gonna kill you and your kids. I didn’t do anything to this girl and not only has she hurt me she wants to kill my family,” she said tearfully.
 
Oraivej filed a lawsuit Monday in King County Superior Court against Court Services Institute and the company’s owner and president, Lorraine W. Nelson. The suit also names the instructor who taught the class. Oraivej is seeking a refund as well as monetary damages for her injuries and emotional distress. (Read the lawsuit filed by Oraivej at the bottom of this article)
 
The KING 5 Investigators contacted Court Services Institute and requested an on-camera interview. The office manager said the only person who could do an interview was Lorraine Nelson but she would be out of the state until December 12.
 
Reached by telephone in Hawaii, Nelson said that she saw no need for changes following the stabbing. “It happened once in ten years,” she said “It was an isolated case.”
 
Nelson said that the instructor had worked for years as a parole officer, where he would have received training in how to handle angry people.
 
Oraivej had many options for receiving anger management classes, but she said she didn’t know that. She said she was directed to Court Services Institute when she received her paperwork from a clerk following her court hearing.
 
The Court Administrator for Issaquah Municipal Court, told KING 5 News that the court does not endorse any one program, but does make a list available at the front counter as a courtesy.
 

Final Complaint: Oraivej v. Court Services Institute et al

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 15 of 34

gearz said on January 19, 2012 at 10:37 AM

Instructor "YOU'RE FIRED" how can you let a person sit with stab wounds bleeding, not to mention terrified from the attack... How in you're right mind can you do this? how??

80111862
Flag this comment

wishfulthinking said on December 8, 2011 at 12:59 AM

Priceless! Until this article I had no idea many of my client were being court ordered to attend non certified anger management programs. Know now! Will be asking for refferals to certified programs in the future. Can't wait for the expanations on that one!

78079868
Flag this comment

americnharly190 said on December 7, 2011 at 10:16 AM

@ dakotanative, the instructor should have immediately let her go. She was complying with her order, they should have just signed off on her class. The instructor said he only had one more thing to go over with her. If that is the case, it was minimal. You don't in good concience make a person sit there with a stab would, no matter how small. So i do think she has a right to sue.

78040689
Flag this comment

dakotanative said on December 7, 2011 at 8:00 AM

Handsfree is the key word. If the phone was on the seat with the speaker on, she would not have been stopped. The goal of the law is to not have people fumbling with things while driving. The fact that you can pick out a driver on the phone from several cars back just by how they are driving is reason enough to restrict their use.

78031834
Flag this comment

Rattler said on December 7, 2011 at 7:00 AM

Sue em'...just another money scheme by our cash strapped city/county governments. Hit em' back where it hurts.

78028088
Flag this comment

sammiejoe said on December 7, 2011 at 12:44 AM

By the way, speaking of the money grubbers giving tickets for everything and demanding these "classes be taken". One of my friends just had a ticket for talking on her cell phone. She was stopped in traffic on the highway so no movement but the cop was apparently right behind her and to the side. I read the RCW and it (RCW 46.61.667) and it specifically states that you can have a "hands free mode" while using the phone which means (same RCW) device with a speaker phone, headset, or earpiece. Combined with the RCW the section 1. the RCW says: "person operating a moving motor vehicle while holding a wireless communications device to his or her ear is guilty of a traffic infraction." So my friend got a $120 dollar ticket because it was the Complete and Total Arbitrary decision of the cop saying the phone was "too close to her ear" even though he admitted she had it on speaker phone. The RCW does not define "to the ear"; is that three inches, this law is just a money maker. Fraud!

78019404
Flag this comment

sammiejoe said on December 7, 2011 at 12:31 AM

This is the absolute dumbest thing I've ever read. Anyone who has a family that has not been in a shouting match please raise your hand? Ah, what...no hands raised? hmmm...so no even if we do not have any physical violence they are finding other ways to fine us and create a "record" for us. I would be suing for a violation of my Constitutional rights. If i want to break my dvd player I can do that, mad or not. If I want to break my refrigerator, still my right. So I'd say that this country has become harassment by police, and I am a support of police. But when they start citing people for this kind of thing...something is very very wrong. Over the course of a few years people have conflicts, most of these conflicts should be settled easily if there is not domestic violence which means fear and/or physical violence. Please let's have some sanity, to cite her for malicious mischief? She Has The Right to break her dvd player for any reason at any time. Period. Insanity. No court money.

78019178
Flag this comment

dakotanative said on December 6, 2011 at 10:58 PM

I highly doubt that anyone held a knife to her throat and forced her to stay in the class. How can anyone other than the attacker be held responsible? The instructor could not possibly know she would attack. He had no idea the other girl would start a fight. Maybe the whole program should be shut down. Just lock them up for a week and let them out to continue their behavior.

78017037
Flag this comment

ACDC1957 said on December 6, 2011 at 6:50 PM

A TSA inspection prior to the start of class, licensing providers & a large settlement will go a long ways in settling this.

78007517
Flag this comment

juliajae said on December 6, 2011 at 4:00 PM

@stryker - Not true. I called the police when an ex-boyfriend put his fist thru 2 of our homes interior doors and tossed large houseplants at the wall shattering them. The police came and suggested he leave the house for a while to cool down. This was in 2005. I had also heard that there is a mandatory arrest in DV calls. NOT the case. Again in 2006 as I was trying to move out he became violent, I called police and they told him to get in his car (he was intoxicated) and leave the scene. He refused and they STILL did not arrest him.

77999989
Flag this comment

gablestout said on December 6, 2011 at 3:14 PM

Why is this blog filled with substantive comments?Come on people! It was a friggen stabbing at an anger management meeting! That's better that getting a DUI on your way home from AA!

77997621
Flag this comment

klondiko said on December 6, 2011 at 2:22 PM

Looks like one of our old polio immunizations.

77994849
Flag this comment

THEJKH1999 said on December 6, 2011 at 12:52 PM

OK, so they mandatory arrest for a DV was accomplished, then the Judge order her to a class that is NOT allowed to be given for DV, not just sent to any anger management but a specific one and it turns out the class was a privately owned for profit class that LOOKED like a court class, it is not held to any standards and it turns out a court employee owned the company that class is held in. Its no wonder the people have NO faith in the courts these days :( We can all change that, look for your nearest civil rights group, watchdog group and if they support holding courts accountable with reform then join that group and get active. If we all dont get involved it will affect EVERYONE. Its a sad fact that we might ALL find ourselves in the same situation as this person!

77990334
Flag this comment

rights1918255526 said on December 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM

Nice story Linda. This shows so much that is wrong in our Courts today. First, the jusges/commissioners should not be allowed to direct you to a particular service provider. Two Judges were just sent to jail in Pennsylvania for doing that. Secondly, why was she not arrested for Domestic Violence. That is what it was. Why is it she was sent to Anger Management class instead of DV class. Oh wait - forgot, there are only DV classes for men in our state, and Anger Management is for women. It's time for our State Patrol to investigate our Courts, or better yet, give it to the Feds! THis story really shines the light on DV issues in our state - Bias and control by the courts.

77988809
Flag this comment

mellybelly323 said on December 6, 2011 at 11:59 AM

It's lucky she's not a man... Would have been so much worse. Ever since the David Brame incident - this state requires men who commit "dometic violence" acts to shell out thousands of dollars for "treatment". My husband went through this with his ex wife when he found out she was cheating on him with his best friend and while (understandably) upset, broke his favorite reclining chair. Cops were called and charges were filed because he broke apart his own property. He had to attend months of classes at his own expense. One of our best friends, when contacting his ex-wife via phone ONE TIME to ask her to stop calling and harrassing his new girlfriend, was charged with a felony and did jail time for "harrassing" his ex-wife via phone. Are you kidding me? Since David Brame, DV is taken very seriously in this state. In some cases, I think it's entirely needed. In others, it's a complete JOKE. There needs to be some discretion and cases need to be viewed more objectively.

77987162
Flag this comment

poedoldman said on December 6, 2011 at 11:58 AM

I wonder if Faribah Maradiaga failed the class? She probably has anger issues due to having to spell that name for the rest of her life.

77987117
Flag this comment

gritz said on December 6, 2011 at 11:33 AM

dakotanative - The vehicle breathalyzers you mention must meet federal guidelines, you just cant buy one off the shelf at wallmart and think you have fulfilled your requirements. Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21), supports the use of the ignition interlock system. This is a federal referendium that States use, to require violators the oppurtunity to drive a vehicle while on probation. Totally different then a judge saying go here and pay this amount and I will make this dissapppear. There is no state or federal guidelines that are substanuated by 48 hours of anger mangement. Who stipulates that 48 hours is suffiecient time? What training does the instructor have? Does he/she have the education to correctly identify someone who is a threat to society?

77985398
Flag this comment

starteck81 said on December 6, 2011 at 11:21 AM

There are many messed up things about this story but I think the most surprising thing, to me, is they made her finish the class after she was stabbed. Sure it wasn't life threatening but if she was bleeding even moderately they should have taken her to the hospital or nearest clinic to have it checked out.

77984556
Flag this comment

sealass said on December 6, 2011 at 11:15 AM

I think its good she was arrested for breaking things during an argument. If a man did that there would be no question weather to arrest him and send him to anger management. She should have kept her mouth shut it was an Anger managment class people are there for a reason.

77984108
Flag this comment

chiapetto said on December 6, 2011 at 11:10 AM

There are SO many things gone wrong here. I usually have no respect for our lawsuit-happy society, but this girl has multiple valid cases against the PD, the Court, the Class Providor, the Instructor..... It certainly appears to be some collusion and conflict of interest in this 'industry' of anger management classes, which are a complete waste of time and money. To not have a police officer in the classroom at all times is asinine. The worthless P.o.S. Maradiaga needs to go away for a VERY long time, minor or not. And this girl who was stabbed should be granted $millions, the anger management company fined AND prosecuted, and the judge disbarred for recklessness. Some laws also need to be seriously changed. This whole thing is ridiculous. She's been stabbed and bleeding, and the instructor says "oh, the class will only last a little while longer...' Are you kidding me? IDIOT instructor!

77983853
Flag this comment

snocoguy said on December 6, 2011 at 10:28 AM

“There’s really no excuse for someone being stabbed in an anger management class. It clearly didn’t come out of nowhere,” said Ackley. Could it possibly be that sticking a large group of volatile individuals in a small room for a long period of time is not a good idea? I would assume that violent outbursts happen often in an anger management course.

77981142
Flag this comment

wawolf said on December 6, 2011 at 10:25 AM

So many things wrong here. Like why was she arrested for breaking a DVD player in her own house? Sounds like a money grab by the state to get fines and kickbacks from the "Anger Management" class provider. Then there is the idiot instructor who didn't try and defuse the situation and then asked her to finish the class after she had been stabbed. Hope she gets a bunch of money from the idiots who run the class.

77980989
Flag this comment

Seattledad said on December 6, 2011 at 10:25 AM

dakotanative; I'm OK with them profiting, but it's not OK when a judge repeatedly sends his/her business to one named private company. i don't know that that is happening in this case, but i know for sure it happens when family law commissioners in king county send business to the same pet private DV treatment companeis every day. There's a list of 30 to choose from, but they funnel business to one or two pet providers and those providers reward the judges with 'expert testimony', "evaluations" and "expert reports" that say what the judge wants them to say. This way the commissioners make their predetermined rulings without any hassels from things like evidence, due process, etc. These judges/commissioners and their pet providers have gotten so comfortable with their arrangement that they don't try too hard to even make it look equitable. Some might call this racketeering...

77980933
Flag this comment

dakotanative said on December 6, 2011 at 10:07 AM

Why is it a shock that private companies profit from the courts? Private companies are putting machines in cars to stop drunken idiots every day. If there is nothing wrong with damaging your own stuff, is it ok to burn down the family house if you are upset?

77979953
Flag this comment

Maxium said on December 6, 2011 at 9:20 AM

Faribah Maradiaga "keepin it real" as they say

77977479
Flag this comment

gritz said on December 6, 2011 at 9:09 AM

Maybe I am wrong, but I fail to see how the courts can have your civil records expunged if you go to a non certified, non State sponsored course. The illusion of impropriety exists, when a third party business, is awarded state business without contractual competition. There has to be some standard as to what requirements are to be learned and I don’t think watching a Dr. Phil show is what they should be doing. I too, would be upset if this is what I would have to endure to get a BS charge removed from my record. Stabbing someone is overboard, but I understand her frustration. I will remove your reckless driving charge is you attend Velvet Jones’s school of driving. You pay the money and spend a class watching reruns of CHiP's. Are the Judge and Doctor associates?

77976891
Flag this comment

skwish-e said on December 6, 2011 at 8:19 AM

"Oraivej said the class did teach her one thing: “Up until this point, I really didn’t know what the word ‘ironic’ meant. Now I know.”" At least she has a sense of humor.

77974124
Flag this comment

stryker said on December 6, 2011 at 8:16 AM

If the police are called to your home for a domestic issue, a minimum of one person MUST be arrested.

77973932
Flag this comment

tugthug said on December 6, 2011 at 7:42 AM

Hire TSA to do strip searches before the class!

77971913
Flag this comment

big_don said on December 6, 2011 at 4:47 AM

As long as you don't injure anyone, and only damage your own stuff, Ms. Oraivej's original behavior should be considered constitutionally protected freedom of expression under the First Amendment. The State of Washington Constitution takes a strong stance on this, even going beyond the US Constitution in some cases. If Ms. Oraivej had appealed her original case to the State Supreme Court, bet she would have gotten off scott free, and that portion of DV law would get tossed.....

77965078
Flag this comment

ElBobbo said on December 6, 2011 at 3:22 AM

My DVD player will sleep better tonight knowing that this evil woman has been to 2 classes.

77963517
Flag this comment

Seattledad said on December 6, 2011 at 1:54 AM

If she was a man she would have been ordered to Domestic Violence treatment and it would be a minimum of 12 months not 2 days and with no maximum and it would cost her thousands of $$ not $180. In fact WA DV law requires that anger managment CANNOT be substituted for DV treatment - the DV treatment providers wrote this law themselves to fatten their wallets. Just another family law commissioner taking matters into her/his own hands to make sure the woman walks rather than following the law. She said she was surprised when she was charged with a crime. Stomping on a DVD player should not be a crime, but the DV industry has decided what is and isn't a DV crime. The only problem is that women commit DV too and the DV industry doesn't like that so they presure judges to make exceptions for women. We won't solve the DV issue until we stop sticking our heads in the sand. Both men and women get angry and do things we shouldn't.

77962759
Flag this comment

agarmy said on December 6, 2011 at 1:53 AM

That is really really stupid to be arrested. Perhaps they actually need some sort of supervision in these classes, considering the classes are for people with "violent" outbrusts. Or they are supposed to be for people who are supposed to be violent.

77962727
Flag this comment

intrepid1 said on December 6, 2011 at 12:08 AM

Funny how breaking a DVD player in one's own home (probably even one's on property or joint property) can result in an arrest on " malicious mischief" charges. This is just the sort of thing that people who want government out of people's lives should focus on, rather than seeking to put more and more government into people's lives -- but we know all they really want is less control on business and more on private citizens with whom they disagree. Silly, really.

77961069
Flag this comment