Print
Email
Share

Gov't advisers say birth control should be covered by insurance companies

by Associated Press

KING5.com

Posted on July 19, 2011 at 11:23 AM

WASHINGTON - Millions of women may soon gain free access to a broad menu of birth control methods, thanks to a recommendation issued Tuesday by health experts advising the government.

An Institute of Medicine panel recommended that the government require health insurance companies to cover birth control for women as a preventive service, without copayments. Contraception -- along with such care as diabetes tests during pregnancy and screening for the virus that causes cervical cancer -- was one of eight recommended preventive services for women.

The law already requires most health plans to provide standard preventive care for people of both sexes at no additional charge to patients, but the women's health recommendations were considered so sensitive that the nonpartisan institute was asked to examine the issue and report back. The IOM advises the government on complex issues related to medical science and health care policy.

A half century after the introduction of the birth control pill, the IOM recommendations may help to usher in another revolution. Medical experts say easier access could start a shift to more reliable forms of long-acting birth control, such as implants or IUDs, which are gaining acceptance in other economically developed countries.

First, expect a fight over social mores. Catholic bishops and some other religious and social conservatives say pregnancy is a healthy condition and the government should not require insurance coverage of drugs and other methods that prevent it.

However, short of repealing provisions of the health care law, it's unclear what opponents can do to block the recommendations. The final decision, by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, is expected to be issued quickly.

Birth control use is virtually universal in the United States, according to government statistics. Generic versions of the pill are available for as little as $9 a month at big drug store chains.

Yet about half of all pregnancies are unplanned. Many occur among women using some form of contraception, and forgetting to use it is a major reason. Experts say a shift to longer acting forms of birth control would help.

Birth control is about more than sheer prevention of pregnancy -- it can help make a woman's next pregnancy healthier by spacing births far enough apart, generally 18 months to two years. Research links closely spaced births to a risk of such problems as prematurity, low birthweight, even autism.

Other preventive services recommended by the IOM panel include: HIV screening; support for breast- feeding mothers, including the cost of renting pumps; counseling about sexually transmitted infections; screening for domestic violence and at least one "well-woman" preventive care visit annually.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 6 of 6

noskills said on July 19, 2011 at 4:28 PM

@firesoul...there is less added cost to the consumer with birth control then there is when then insurance company pays for the prenatal care and the birth and then to cover the child as he or she grows up. Im sorry but birth control will never add up to cost as much as it is to have the baby. You would think that insurance companies would want to cover birth control for that simple reason. Its also silly how some insurances wont cover birth control but ED drugs sure are covered.

70967428
Flag this comment

firesoul said on July 19, 2011 at 3:38 PM

@justin9727039791: Any added cost will always be passed on to the consumer.

70965127
Flag this comment

justin9727039791 said on July 19, 2011 at 3:25 PM

@firesoul - read the article it is not about taxpayer funded birth control, medicaid already covers birth control. This is about forcing private insurance companies to cover birth control as a preventative care item, meaning no cost to the insured.

70964384
Flag this comment

bazwest said on July 19, 2011 at 2:56 PM

The assumption here is that unwanted preganancies are happening because these women don't have access to long term birth control options. I would like to see the studies that helped them draw this conclusion. If this mandate is put into effect I am willing to bet that the rate at which women have unwanted pregnancies will not go down at all because it is going to be lifestyle choices rather than lack of access that is the largest contributor to unwanted pregnancies. As was highlighted in the story there are many cheap and effective forms of birth prevention methods out there already.

70962911
Flag this comment

firesoul said on July 19, 2011 at 12:43 PM

I do not like the principle of taxpayer dollars going towards birth control. We'd essentially be paying money towards something that responsible people should already be doing. The solution should not reward forgetfulness, laziness, or plain apathy. First off, if someone forgets to use birth control or doesn't care, how will it make a difference whether or not they are given it for free? Secondly, just like money can't buy happiness, it can't buy intelligence. People will still make poor decisions. Lastly, if someone can't afford birth control, what business do they have with intercourse?? No, taxpayer-funded birth control will not solve the problem.

70955693
Flag this comment

twowebfeetinwa51 said on July 19, 2011 at 11:46 AM

I hope that they cover BC. It is ridiculous all of these woman popping out these kids one after another. They need to say no and the men need to keep it in their pants! I am so sick of seeing these huge families getting help from the state or federal Gov because they can't support their huge families. Plus they can't keep their kids in line. Have the number of kids you can afford people and if you can't afford them, don't have them. And YES I have a kid, one!!! It was all we could afford.

70952063
Flag this comment