Print
Email
Share

Company builds roads for coal terminal without proper permit

by JAKE WHITTENBERG / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @jakewhittenberg

KING5.com

Posted on August 1, 2011 at 5:20 PM

Updated Monday, Aug 1 at 5:20 PM

BELLINGHAM, Wash. -- Whatcom County is prepared to fine Seattle-based company SSA Marine after it says the company built a series of roads through sensitive woodlands without the proper permit.

SSA Marine has proposed a $500 million multi-commodities terminal at Cherry Point. It would receive shipments of commodities like coal and ship it over the Pacific to China. The company says the two miles or so of dirt road is necessary to allow heavy equipment to conduct environmental impact studies in the area of the proposed terminal.

The company has not officially applied for the state and federal permits, and the required environmental impact studies have not begun. A company spokesman says SSA Marine, though it was permitted to build the roads based on a permit it received for a separate terminal in 1997.

Whatcom County decided Monday that SSA Marine exceeded its permit. It also says the company is in violation because it failed to protect sensitive wetlands.

"They have a lot of explaining to do," says Pete Kremen, County Executive. "For them to disregard our regulations on something this important just amazes me."

Kremen says the company could face fines from the county and the state Department of Ecology for the violations.

"My administration is very serious about this issue and a slap on the wrist is not what we're looking at," says Kremen.

In a statement from SSA Marine, company Vice President Bob Watters says, "As soon as we became aware there was a question about our compliance, we ordered an immediate stop to all work until we had cleared up the matter. We have reconfirmed to all our employees and contractors on the Gateway project that SSA Marine has a strict standard of full compliance with all environmental regulations.”

Kremen says the county's rules must be followed.

"It certainly does raise questions about their claim about how concerned they are about following all the rules and regulations," he says.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 7 of 7

seatteresid said on August 2, 2011 at 12:28 PM

This is even a worse deal for Seattle than it is for Bellingham. At least Bellingham gets a few pennies in tax dollar and about 50 jobs. For the millions of dollars of profit that SS Marine gets, Seattle gets train noise, train horns, train delays, train soot, and coal soot. Nothing makes a family not want to go to Pike Street market or the Aquarium or any other place downtown than to think that there's so much noise and pollution that you come home angry and frustrated. And for those people who have a home or own property near the tracks, say something now to Gregoire or resign yourselves to living with it forever (without getting a dime to compensate you for the money you lose in property values).

71694281
Flag this comment

Bob_Ferris4d8 said on August 2, 2011 at 12:11 PM

Yes jobs are jobs and everyone is sensitive to that fact but indications are that this project will cost more jobs that it creates--particularly when viewed on a national scale when we ship under-priced raw materials to a growing and competing economy.

71693329
Flag this comment

Jimmy19671977 said on August 1, 2011 at 11:48 PM

Jobs are jobs people..

71662013
Flag this comment

Whatcomman said on August 1, 2011 at 8:28 PM

I lived in Montana where the coal trains will be coming from. The trains on average are over 200 cars long, very dusty and lost of noise. Bellingham is trying to revitalize a waterfront for the good of Washington State, a port would be a very bad choice.

71657592
Flag this comment

Bob_Ferris4d8 said on August 1, 2011 at 7:16 PM

If it were five trains a day it might not be that bad but this project when running at 72% of capacity (48 million metric tons) would mean 18 additional train trips a day a long the 624 mile route through Washington State.

71654286
Flag this comment

skok_cush said on August 1, 2011 at 6:08 PM

Im sick and tired of taxes, i mean the permit process. good for the company, if it was left to the govt to get economy and jobs going, WA would be, well, like it has become.

71651231
Flag this comment

brexcavator said on August 1, 2011 at 5:44 PM

We do not want 5 trains per day, all over 1.5 miles, all going right through Marysville, Mount Vernon, Burlington, Bellingham, all for a very small number of jobs..

71650147
Flag this comment