Print
Email
Share

18% tax on soda equals 5 pounds weight loss, study finds

18% tax on soda equals 5 pounds weight loss, study finds

Credit: AP

18% tax on soda equals 5 pounds weight loss, study finds

by KING5.com

KING5.com

Posted on March 9, 2010 at 11:15 AM

Updated Tuesday, Mar 9 at 11:16 AM

SEATTLE – As the Washington state Legislature mulls over whether to raise taxes on cigarettes, candy and bottled water, a new study suggests that people would lose five pounds a year if soda prices were hiked up 18 percent.

Nutrition researchers at the University of North Carolina, studied the eating habits of 5,115 adults between the ages of 18 and 30 over a 20 year period. The study looked at consumption of soda, pizza, hamburgers and whole milk.

Researchers found that a 10 percent price hike led to a 7 percent decrease in soda consumption and an 11.5 percent decrease in pizza consumption. More specifically when it came to soda, researchers reportedly found that a $1 increase in the price of soda resulted in an intake of 124 fewer calories per day. As a result, there was weight loss.

From that, the researchers suggest that an 18 percent tax on the price of soda would cause a person to consume about 56 fewer calories per day and lose about five pounds in a year. They say that could lead to fewer cases of diabetes, heart disease and cancer.

The study reportedly found that, on average, participants started the project consuming 2,972 calories per day and lowered that to 2,403 calories per day. While that sounds impressive, it also contradicts a study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released in 2004 that showed American women increased their daily calorie intake by 22 percent between 1971 and 2000, and men increased their daily calorie consumption by 7 percent over that same period.

The beverage industry disagrees with the North Carolina study's findings. A spokesperson for the American Beverage Association tells USA Today that the study "is not representative of real world eating habits, It picks and chooses what foods to look at with narrow presumptions about how foods might be substituted for one another."

The study was published Monday in the Archives of Internal Medicine.

Print
Email
Share

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 15 of 35

justme1970 said on March 12, 2010 at 10:18 AM

COLLEGE GUY - yea, replace it with wine!! much funner and better for your heart!! :)

39134581
Flag this comment

collegeguy said on March 11, 2010 at 5:50 PM

Whine, complain. But the study is wrong because it makes an assumption as to how much the average person might cut back because of the increased cost. Not to mention any weight loss will mainly be at first when someone cuts soda. Most people will replace those calories with something else.

39095286
Flag this comment

intell said on March 11, 2010 at 11:13 AM

They won't be happy until they run soda ,candy and pizza vendors out of business by taxing.

39072708
Flag this comment

gritz said on March 11, 2010 at 9:56 AM

In actuality, the State is trying to change human behavior through price control. There is a agenda that they are trying to fulfill. They want you in shape, non smoking, drinking and not over weight. By reducing those factors you will be in better shape and will be less of a medical burden to the State. While this hypostasis is correct, I do not want my Government forcing their will onto me. While I am not sure this is a conscious process, the taxes that are being implied are lifestyle enhancers, except for the water tax which is just stupid. I predict we will have more gas taxes soon. That way we will be forced to drive less, car pool or take public transit. This will lower our emission and help "Green" the State. If the state was serious about gaining revenue, they would lower the price of cigarettes. Make the state the lowest in the country. What you lose in higher tax revenue we would gain more back in quantity. “Outerstaters” would come here to buy in bulk.

39067398
Flag this comment

mamafrou said on March 10, 2010 at 1:11 PM

I agree Seattlelovemongr - Aren't we supposed to be allowed to make our own choices? Opening the door for so many other things....

39014718
Flag this comment

tj1999 said on March 10, 2010 at 1:00 PM

"More specifically when it came to soda, researchers reportedly found that a $1 increase in the price of soda resulted in an intake of 124 fewer calories per day. As a result, there was weight loss" Actually, wouldn't that just prevent additional weight gain? You need a caloric deficit for weight loss and that's not gonna happen at 124 fewer calories a day unless you're on a pretty meager diet.

39013869
Flag this comment

rmo70 said on March 10, 2010 at 10:41 AM

I sure hope they don't think they're going to put more tax on diet/ sugar-free soda?!!

39003713
Flag this comment

javajoe said on March 10, 2010 at 9:54 AM

Who would have thought that increasing taxes decreases consumption? Do you suppose that increasing taxes on much of anything makes sense especially during an economic downturn? So the truth of it is the politicians understand this principle. Yet they impose higher taxes on us anyway. WAKE UP PEOPLE

38999883
Flag this comment

angelainbothell said on March 9, 2010 at 11:16 PM

Why can the government not make the intuitive leap between "tax soda and cigarettes, people drink/smoke less" to "tax businesses, people hire fewer workers"? They KNOW taxing things reduces that thing. Hello??

38973594
Flag this comment

clear2copy said on March 9, 2010 at 8:50 PM

bad day for the diet-coke heads.. stuff leeches the calcium outta your bones and dehydrates you at the same time..

38969993
Flag this comment

d8tabrazil said on March 9, 2010 at 5:29 PM

Boy, so many people focusing on candy and soda. DId you happen to actually read the "bottled water" part? So 2 out of the 3 have sugar in them. But TAX on WATER?! I guess water must be adding weight to people. What's next? A fruit and vegetible tax added to the potatochips tax? No wait, maybe a tax on meat, pork, chicken, and fish tax added to the popcorn in a box tax. Get on the phone, call your rep, and start yelling at this obsurd mentality that the legistlators of WA have succumbed to.

38961146
Flag this comment

jah20 said on March 9, 2010 at 5:26 PM

Time to move to Idaho! They understand basic economic principles over there...

38961043
Flag this comment

jah20 said on March 9, 2010 at 5:25 PM

This is a perfect example of how stupid people are in government. If you raise the tax on something, people will spend less money on that item. When people spend less money on the taxed item, less taxes goes to the government. Government then raises taxes further on other items to make up for the lost revenue coming from the taxed item that people no longer want to buy because of its price. EXAMPLE: Cigarette taxes! To bring in more money and keep people from smoking the government has hiked cigarette taxes over and over again. Why? When they become more expensive the government may have achieved the goal of getting people to quit smoking, but now the state is bringing in less revenue. If they hike cigarette taxes even more, then even fewer people will purchase cigarettes and fewer tax dollars goes to Uncle Sam. So rather than another obscene cigarette tax they are going after another market, soda pop! And the cycle continues until no one can afford anything.

38960983
Flag this comment

tj1999 said on March 9, 2010 at 4:50 PM

No tax on water @tornado actually, there is if it's bottled and depending where you are, you can't always get water that isn't in a bottle or at least, you won't want to.

38959596
Flag this comment

gphxgphx said on March 9, 2010 at 4:40 PM

Maybe those people would lose weight because after buying their cigarettes, soda, and water they'd be broke, have no money left for food, and be starving. This type of tax always impacts the poor most of all. Previously I lived in Phoenix and the last increase in tobacco tax saw the rise of something I'd never seen before, people holding up convenience stores to rob them of cigarettes and only cigarettes. Making it so people can't afford things only criminalizes them through the back door. The joke is sugared soda is taxed as unhealthy but as far as I can tell sodas with artificial sweeteners that are being looked at with more and more suspicion, aren't. Now that's a joke.

38959127
Flag this comment

anonymoususer said on March 9, 2010 at 4:03 PM

A doughnut tax would make more sense - but then you would have all the cops on strike........................... what about the sugar in lemonade and other non-carbonated drinks? And how do they define sugar ---- will the tax be on high fructose corn syrup too or just cane / beet sugar?

38957203
Flag this comment

scott_bellevue said on March 9, 2010 at 3:35 PM

Soda pop is not food. Corn sugar is not nutrition. Saccharin is not food either. That being said, this will neither raise taxes or decrease people's weight. Just more bureaucracy in search of ways to balance a budget that could be balanced with more state efficiencies.

38955796
Flag this comment

anonymoususer said on March 9, 2010 at 3:17 PM

So how many donuts can one eat to make up for one soda??? ............ If the state did in the over priced under capacity viaduct replacement tunnel nobody (but the developers) want, they would have enough money to fund everything twice over without having to increase taxes - but the fools in olympia will build their idiotic tunnel at any price - even if it means raising taxes on everything else and driving companies to move out of the state.

38954798
Flag this comment

fixin2go said on March 9, 2010 at 3:05 PM

Amen anonymous! Both major parties suck!!

38954221
Flag this comment

anonymoususer said on March 9, 2010 at 3:02 PM

When they tried a usage (parking) tax on state parks to raise $$$ - claiming it would raise BILLIONS for the state, nobody went to the state parks and they ended up removing the tax. ............ So now they want to raise money by taxing soda claiming people would lose weight if they put a tax on it - if everyone quits drinking the soda (and lose weight) as they claim, then how does that help the state budget? They can't collect taxes on a product nobody is buying. The fact is, if they put a tax on it to raise money for the state, they would WANT people to buy it - so why are they throwing out this hogwash with how much healthier people will be if they tax it and people stop buying it???......................... So much for the bottling companies that employ people in this state (not to mention the truckers who ship them their ingredients and truckers who haul their products to the stores)........... It's time to vote out the party candidates in the state and elect INDEPENDENTS.

38954058
Flag this comment

sunnyseattle said on March 9, 2010 at 2:49 PM

If drinking pop is the worst thing people do....lets add a tax to candy, in fact lets add a tax to anything that has sugar in it... the government needs to mind its own business.

38953406
Flag this comment

kb1971 said on March 9, 2010 at 2:32 PM

@ tacwistler, I am not over weight. I don't use soda to replace my healthy food. it is my one vice or what ever you would like to call it. just like those that drink coffee. as for your cigarettes, why should I be exposed to your second hand smoke that has been shown to cause cancer which would then increase medical expenses?

38952438
Flag this comment

chuckstr76 said on March 9, 2010 at 2:29 PM

And somebody got paid to figure this out!!! What a rocket scientist he is...

38952223
Flag this comment

hawgger1951 said on March 9, 2010 at 2:19 PM

So if we stop drinking soda so we can lose weight how many jobs are lost by the manufacturing plants that make the soda and how does the increase in unemployment benefits for those affect me. Leave my soda alone and cut costs within the government.

38951711
Flag this comment

tacwilster said on March 9, 2010 at 1:54 PM

to KB1971 why am i penalized for smoking cigarettes, over weight people account just as much if not more for medical expenses in this country than do smokers, so why am I penalized. I think all people that are 30 pounds over their nomal weight should be taxed 25% for each pound over and then there would be no money shortage in government**

38950118
Flag this comment

ohhello said on March 9, 2010 at 1:35 PM

I really don't remember signing on the government to be my Mother. Another great idea by the woman who has cost us billions.

38949003
Flag this comment

justme1970 said on March 9, 2010 at 1:11 PM

drink wine! "women who drink wine less likely to gain weight, says study". I don't drink much soda, but buy it to have around and i too think this is ridiculous! I agree, cut salaries and start with the wretched Mrs. G!!!

38947608
Flag this comment

gritz said on March 9, 2010 at 12:59 PM

Well we just added a 90% increase to a case of water. How is that going to figure in your equation? The timing of this story and the placement you give it tends to correspond to your political position. I wish you, King 5, would stop trying to sugar coat our predicament. Using your logic, if the price of food gets to expensive to buy, we all will lose weight. DUH...This is another one of your stupid stories that you fill your website with. Total waste of time to read.

38946758
Flag this comment

wawolf said on March 9, 2010 at 12:50 PM

Yes soda is bad for you. And like most sugary treats, should be consumed in moderation. However if you tax the hell out of it people will stop drinking it. This will result in a lot fewer sales, which equates to lost jobs in the soft drink industry. These people will need to rely on unemployment benefits, thus negating the gains the state might get from the increased tax.

38946187
Flag this comment

fixin2go said on March 9, 2010 at 12:44 PM

Here's an idea...stop drinking soda all together, lose an average 10 lbs. in a year and tell the politicians to get bent. Oh wait...if they can't get your money that way never fear they will just have to start taxiing air ! WA government needs to stop spending money like a kid on a Christmas shopping spree!! Oh sh*t...I just mentioned Christmas...just can't win!!

38945773
Flag this comment

rmo70 said on March 9, 2010 at 12:41 PM

I sure hope they''re not talking about sugar free soda! There's already a tax on soda anyway! 9% isn't enough?

38945526
Flag this comment

tornado said on March 9, 2010 at 12:22 PM

No tax on water and for most people it's free. Drink up.

38944178
Flag this comment

lifeinamerica said on March 9, 2010 at 12:13 PM

This is good news! Pop is so bad for our bodies! Raise them taxes up so high no one buys pop anymore. Drinking pop is like drinking poison. Ick!

38943626
Flag this comment

kb1971 said on March 9, 2010 at 11:48 AM

Why am I to be penalized for having a soda? I don't drink coffee and I limit my soda intake to 1-2 cans per day but this is my caffiene source. Seems slightly unfair to me. I understand that we have a budget problem, but taxing bottles of water and soda and then candy doesn't seem the way to fix it. Maybe pay cuts in Olympia instead?

38941912
Flag this comment

seattlelovemongr said on March 9, 2010 at 11:33 AM

Why is the govermnet telling me how and what I can eat?????...I eat healthy food when I can "afford" to eat them.....I tell you what Government...lower the cost of healthy foods ...then I will eat healthy....(ie) unhealthy can of soup .79 cents....healthy soup $3.49....unhealthy cookies $2.99....healthy cookies $5.59.... the next thing you know it's the dinner selection being a choice between Soylent Red, Soylent Yellow, or Soylent Green.......Big Brother needs to stay out of my pocket, life choices and dinner table!!!!!!

38940916
Flag this comment

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?

Register Now

Member Benefits

Link your account to your Twitter or Facebook account for easier login!

Link your account to your Facebook profile Link your account to your Twitter profile

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

* - Indicates required field

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

Connecting to

You may need to allow pop up window for this step of registration

Just one more step:

Please take a moment to review the available e-mail newsletters has to offer. Place a checkbox next to the newsletters you wish to subscribe to.

Welcome.

Thank you for becoming a member of KING5.com. You now have full access to the best local coverage and late breaking news from KING5.com. Soon you will be redirected to the page you were seeking, and a confirmation email will be delivered to you.

You will need to respond to the confirmation e-mail for your account to be activated.

KING5.com is dedicated to bringing you exceptional news and outstanding information services, all while personalizing it to your liking. We're sure you'll enjoy being a KING5.com member! If you need assistance, please contact us.