Print
Email
Share

Washington one of several states working to preserve historic barns

Washington one of several states working to preserve historic barns

Credit: DAHP

Calf Creek Barn, Adams County - 1923 - was rehabilitated through a Heritage Barn Grant.

by Associated Press

KING5.com

Posted on February 19, 2012 at 1:43 PM

KANSAS CITY, Mo. - Thousands of precariously leaning, rotting barns with peeling paint and missing boards dot America's rural landscape.

The aging relics hold a certain romance for many, and interest is growing in numerous states in saving or at least documenting the rickety barns before they become victims of age and urban sprawl, the cost of maintenance too high when they no longer have a practical purpose.

Barn surveys have been started in states including Colorado, Connecticut, Michigan, Missouri, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma, Vermont and Washington. With photographs and basic information about the architecture, historical character, use and condition of the barns, the surveys will give preservationists a glimpse of rural American and hints about how to save its bucolic landscape.

"There is a feeling that losing those kinds of structures means we are losing a connection to a really important part of our country's heritage," said James Lindberg, a field director for the National Trust for Historic Preservation. "You would be hard pressed to find a more iconic symbol of rural America."

A 2007 U.S. Department of Agriculture census asked for the first time about barns built before 1960 and found there were more than 664,000 of them. Texas has the most, with more than 51,000, followed by Missouri with about 36,000 and Wisconsin with about 35,000.

In Missouri, awareness of the number spurred the formation last year of the Missouri Barn Alliance and Rural Network, which raises money to survey and find new uses for aging barns. It also created a fund that farmers can borrow from to make repairs and a Facebook page with photographs of old barns grouped by county.

"We figured if we've got a lot, we've got a lot to lose," said Bill Hart, the field representative for the Columbia-based Missouri Preservation, a statewide nonprofit that was instrumental in the formation of the barn group. He added that the band of preservationists "pushed the panic button."

And maybe for good reason. From the outside, many of the barns make for pretty pictures. On the inside, they're often dilapidated and potentially dangerous messes.

Hart, who has fond childhood memories of catching feral cats in his cousins' barn in Ste. Genevieve County in far eastern Missouri, now spends part of his time photographing old barns. Several of the hundreds he has captured over the past three years have since succumbed to neglect.

It's hard to say how quickly the others are crumbling. But the next agriculture census begins later this year, and the results might give barn advocates some clues.

"It will give us a picture of what the change is and the rate of change is," Lindberg said. "It may be encouraging, and if it's discouraging, it may cause us to think a little harder about how we can save them."

Only a handful of Missouri farms have been documented thoroughly enough to allow them to be added to the State Historic Preservation Office database of rural farmsteads. Preservationists want to see more farmsteads added to the list and have offered to meet one-on-one with farmers to help them document what remains.

In Connecticut, photos have been taken of 8,200 barns, said Todd Levine, director of Historic Barns of Connecticut. The effort started in 2004, when an architectural historian was hired to document the 100 most visible barns in the state. Levine said the group launched a website in 2007, and the following year a grant program began providing money to assess barns' conditions and look at ways to save and reuse them.

"The first step in preservation is documentation, so we need to know what we are losing to know what we need to do to protect them," Levine said.

Back in Missouri, barn enthusiasts are being encouraged to attend an upcoming meeting where the preservation group plans to discuss potential partnerships with other organizations to encourage more people to document their barns and perhaps consider reusing them as homes or businesses.

"We are losing them fast," Hart said, "so that is one of our first efforts to try to get as many of them documented as possible."

More information

Washington State Department of Archaeology  & Historic Preservation

National Barn Alliance
 

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 4 of 4

comiccon2010 said on February 20, 2012 at 1:29 AM

the state wont let people demolish them if they are on your property and force you to allow people to go see them if they want.

81684424
Flag this comment

Jake-518 said on February 19, 2012 at 8:46 PM

@spacedover I agree with you that these should be preserved but not entirely about keeping government out out of it. Instead of federal or even state government, these could be preserved by local county or town governments.

81672584
Flag this comment

spacedover said on February 19, 2012 at 5:48 PM

We must save these barns for history but keep the government out of the process.

81661162
Flag this comment

lsmith5870400119 said on February 19, 2012 at 1:54 PM

This is B.S. The government is already telling us how many houses we are allowed to build on rural property, and now the next thing will be telling us what buildings we can or cannot tear down. I agree that old barns are interesting, but they are just a building.

81647582
Flag this comment