Print
Email
Share

Expert says data may link sonar to orca death

by GARY CHITTIM / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @gchittimK5

KING5.com

Posted on February 17, 2012 at 2:37 PM

Updated Friday, Feb 17 at 11:27 PM

Scott Veirs of the Salish Sea Hydrophone Network is up to his ears in marine mammal detective work this week.

Since the discovery of a dead endangered southern resident orca on the Washington coast last weekend, Veirs has been investigating the possibility of a link between the death of the orca and exercises conducted by the Canadian Navy. He said he has married sounds from his network which revealed sonar use by the Canadians near the San Juan Islands last week, and the locations of the Navy ships, available online to anyone.

He has placed their location near the recorded sightings of orcas in the resident L-pod at roughly the same time. He has also detected what he and other members of the network describe as sounds consistent with an underwater explosion.

Veirs said he wonders if the dead orca, also a member of L-pod, may have been exposed to either a deadly dose of sonar or an underwater blast.  Initial inspections of the orca's carcass showed it had suffered extreme trauma but no visible signs exterior wounds.

Veirs said the injuries, deep bruising and discolorations are common affects of percussion wounds suffered by mammals being too close to an explosion.

The Canadian Navy is cooperating with investigators. It has admitted to using sonar in that area during those dates but so far, has not responded to the reports of an underwater blast.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 13 of 13

plant_a_tree said on February 19, 2012 at 4:42 PM

Canadian leaders are not responsible stewards of the environment (witness the irreversible damage of the tar sands) and should not be allowed to use their sonar in our waters as they don't give a d*mn. The U.S. military is aware of the effect of sonar on marine mammals but considers it unpreventable, with the need to test sonar outweighting the torture and killing it causes. With computer technology much more advanced we should insist on computer modeling of sonar with live testing only done in areas without marine mammals. Where are our State representatives? Hiding behind "classified" labeling? This is cowardice when it comes to protecting the unprotected. Step up and challenge the military or account for why you won't!

81657764
Flag this comment

jonjuan said on February 18, 2012 at 6:09 PM

You mean it wasn't Glo Bull warming?

81594334
Flag this comment

davebrownspoint said on February 18, 2012 at 10:43 AM

Right-O clothyard, it could be "some other phenomena," so tell us what that could be. Fairy dust? The Lord's will? You armchair professors are so much more qualified than scientists who study this stuff full time. Right, we can believe YOU.

81573751
Flag this comment

Sir_Real said on February 18, 2012 at 9:55 AM

That looked more like a scrape in the other photos, this whale was physically attacked. BTW the image above looks like the cartoon whale if you type "free willzyx" in google images, ha ha.

81572208
Flag this comment

freedomfrank said on February 18, 2012 at 6:00 AM

In other news, there's no evidence that sonar killed this whale.

81564858
Flag this comment

tprop said on February 17, 2012 at 10:53 PM

@clothyard:antharain'tnoglobalwarming. doh.

81559467
Flag this comment

tprop said on February 17, 2012 at 10:49 PM

hey you know - we gotta play warrior. sht happens. duh. whatever. doh. I like cheerios. whats for breakfast.

81559378
Flag this comment

andriam said on February 17, 2012 at 10:26 PM

um duh, you think?

81558954
Flag this comment

clothyard said on February 17, 2012 at 9:30 PM

What qualfies Scott Veirs as an "expert" by the way, Is he an expert on marine mammal biology? On Sonar? On underwater explosives? Just what are his qualifications? Are we just supposed to take his (or your) word?

81557669
Flag this comment

clothyard said on February 17, 2012 at 9:28 PM

An awful lot of speculation supported by very little Real evidence other than the fact that the so called expert is really not an expert at all but rather one of the fringe so called marine mammal experts. Now it is possible that Sonar or some sort of underwater explosion did injure said Orca, but is is just as possible that some other phenomena is also responsible. How about doing a little bit more factual reporting rather than just passing on speculation.

81557599
Flag this comment

kaseyconrad said on February 17, 2012 at 8:30 PM

This is heart breaking.

81555517
Flag this comment

1wonders said on February 17, 2012 at 6:55 PM

Our Navy continues to do sonor tests too. It's been proven, YEARS AGO, that those sonar detonations are killing whales, dolphins, etc. yet they continue to do them. Our Navy goes so far as to deny the damages, much like the tobacco companies that spent decades denying the cancerous effects of cigarettes. It is unacceptable to allow these tests to continue. However, since in reality they won't stop them, I would think that they could at the very least SUSPEND sonar testing during the time the whales are migrating off the coast. Seems that would be a no-brainer.

81552032
Flag this comment

zymara said on February 17, 2012 at 5:54 PM

Geeeeeezuz! In other words, the Canadian Navy may have blown up one of our L-pod orcas. That's horrible!

81549814
Flag this comment