Print
Email
Share

Is DSHS re-thinking how it handles supervised visits?

by ALLEN SCHAUFFLER / KING 5 News

Bio | Email | Follow: @schauffKING5 | Follow: @schauffKING5

KING5.com

Posted on February 8, 2012 at 7:51 PM

Updated Wednesday, Feb 8 at 7:54 PM

We’ll call her Louise. She's concerned about her identity being known, but when she heard that Josh Powell killed himself and his boys she had very personal reasons for feeling sick.

“The boys were the same age as my boys,” she said.

And they are having supervised visitations with their father, who she describes as violent and abusive. She thinks they could be in danger at those times.

"It hit me really hard because it’s my worst fear,” she said.

But these were on a neutral site like Josh Powell's early visits with his boys. Louise says they took place in a private family care center in Pierce County and far from the main office with no oversight other than one female supervisor. Louise thinks it’s odd in any case where the supervision is court-ordered.

"It means they've already determined there’s a possibility for danger, therefore they have an obligation to make sure the environments safe,” she said.

A DSHS spokesperson points out that Josh Powell's kids weren't taken from him because of abuse or neglect and there had never been reports of that kind of danger in the case.

Similar visitations will continue while the Powell case is reviewed.

 “We're required to make reasonable efforts to be reunified, it would not even be possible to stop visitations of all the children in our care with their parents and siblings,” said Sherry Hill, DSHS spokesperson.

Private companies doing supervision work have their own standards for hiring but say the workers aren't state licensed and there's virtually no state oversight.

For Louise, it doesn’t make sense. If you're 20 years old, have 20 hours of training in domestic violence awareness and a high school education you meet state standards. She and many people in the supervised visitation industry want to see changes.

"I would have to say if we don’t look at it then we're all at fault,” she said.

Chuck Cox said they had no role in choosing the company that over saw those visits. That was ordered by the court and DSHS.

Also, according to Sherry Hill at DSHS, all parties involved agreed that once-a-week supervised home visits would be ok.

The state now has six months to complete what they call a "child fatality review."

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 14 of 14

wmwlarsonphd said on February 14, 2012 at 10:09 AM

Stop blaming the judge in this situation. Judges only have the statutory right to order supervised, or non supervised, visitations. It is beyond their statutory authority to order where those visits are to occur. It leaves that determination to DSHS since it is the child's legal custodian. DSHS failed once again to make decisions based on the safety of the children involved.

81361078
Flag this comment

groovygal said on February 9, 2012 at 7:01 PM

The family court judge who ordered the supervised visitations even after ordering a pshychological sexual examination of Josh Powell should be removed from the bench! The judge was not prioritizing the safety and well-being of these precious boys who have already been through so much tragedy.

81143128
Flag this comment

Rowanc said on February 9, 2012 at 5:26 PM

I am with Louise! I had a proven case of domestic violence with the local womans shelter and DSHS. I had a nurse at the hospical report the behavior of my ex to childhood services. But I was told by the custody evaluator that my relationship with him was different and was no basis of what his relationship will be like with her. It was insulting. I felt like they treated me like a crazy woman against fathers rights. I was just trying to protect my baby and no one cared. I had a choice to stay in the horrible situation or else leave it and send her back to him unprotected?!? My fear has always been that a little child trusts completely, and if a sociopath (which clearly fits the description of Josh) turns on them, it comes out of no where (I know). It can destroy someone psychologically and in this case physically. But if I don't send her with him, I violate a court order and could loose custody.

81138702
Flag this comment

luna1sierra said on February 9, 2012 at 4:58 PM

The department of Social Services is so under staffed now it isn't funny. This department gets cut every time the budget comes up. Hire enough people to do the job properly!

81137211
Flag this comment

secretsmoker said on February 9, 2012 at 1:55 PM

The DSHS system in Washington state is badly in need of a complete overhaul. One only has to read the news to see that. You have cases like this, where the system tragically failed the children they are suppose to protect. You also have cases where families have been torn apart and put through months, and in some cases years of fighting to regain custody of children that should never have been taken in the first place. There is no consistency as to how cases are handled. Aren't there suppose to be protocols and procedures in place to protect the children as well as guard the rights of the families? If there are it doesn't seem like they are being followed or we wouldn't have so many of these types of cases in the news. I was a foster child back in the 1970's, the system was bad then. Does not seem like it has improved much in the past 40yrs.

81127187
Flag this comment

cjflyrton2012 said on February 9, 2012 at 1:18 PM

Supervised visits - they have been deemed necessary for safety of the children - therefor, they should be in a neutral place with protection for the children and the social worker - home visits should be separated from supervised visits. If parent is deemed stable - then visits in the home may be ok - there never has been anything stable about John Powell - I do hope the judge re-thinks what is appropriate for future safety of all - including neighbors and other innocent people!

81124963
Flag this comment

soberem85 said on February 9, 2012 at 12:48 PM

I consistently amazes me that DSHS/CPS can get things so wrong, on both ends of the spectrum. They consistently under-monitor reported cases of abuse & neglect on the one hand, and on the other make outlandish claims of abuse and neglect against innocent families that they over-pursue to the tune of hundreds of thousands in tax-payer dollars. (Our family having been one of the latter, against whom all completely unfounded claims have been dropped, but only after months of disruption and heartache.) The main issue is that, despite their claims, their first priority is NOT the welfare of children; it's COVERING THEIR OWN ASSES. They care more about liability than they do the actual welfare of our children. If they cared about the actual welfare of children, they wouldn't get it so WRONG on both ends of the spectrum. They do the bare minimum if it covers their bases in terms of liability, and they also over-pursue if they're worried about liability. Bureaucracy clouding common sense!

81123422
Flag this comment

spacedover said on February 9, 2012 at 8:47 AM

DSHS does it again, when are we going to eliminate this bunch of bureaucrats that can't do their jobs. Save the state a whole lot of money and future embarrassment .Remove this department and these people who are clueless in most situations and save the tax money, they waste every year..

81109084
Flag this comment

dakotanative said on February 9, 2012 at 7:03 AM

The social worker is like the rent a cop at the mall. Not there to pull a gun and take down a perp. Just there to observe and report. That is what she did.

81103328
Flag this comment

treeclimber said on February 9, 2012 at 6:34 AM

the guy was a nut case, and the person who took the boys there was not capable of insureing there safty.

81101931
Flag this comment

mrsss said on February 9, 2012 at 5:33 AM

dshs should be eliminated. Their constant incompetence is a daily issue. They are not capable of protecting anyone. How many more kids have to die because these people can't/won't do their jobs. Most of these people aren't qualified to dig ditches.

81099652
Flag this comment

commonsensewa said on February 9, 2012 at 1:26 AM

It's just too bad that the judicial system didn't take 5 minutes to consider the deteriorating mental and legal status of the murderer and adjusted the terms of the visitation. He was JUST sentenced to what was, in his mind, the last straw. What judge with so many years of experience couldn't predict that that murderer would act out? The basic problem we have and always will, is that we will Never be able to know what's going on in the mind of any one person at any one time. So why not err on the side of caution?

81096317
Flag this comment

tprop said on February 8, 2012 at 10:35 PM

This article has no particular point.

81093557
Flag this comment

dakotanative said on February 8, 2012 at 10:04 PM

I am not, and never will be a fan of DSHS, but in this case, there is nothing reasonable that could have been done, and nothing needs to change with them. The police and courts need to make changes. There is no one with half a brain that wouldn't see something coming. They knew they were messing with him, and eventually he would do something drastic.

81092783
Flag this comment