Print
Email
Share

Cancer patient says Microsoft cut his job because he got sick

by ERIC WILKINSON / KING 5 News

KING5.com

Posted on April 21, 2011 at 5:34 PM

Updated Thursday, Apr 21 at 5:38 PM

BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, Wash. -- A former Microsoft employee is suing the company, claiming managers eliminated his job after he got cancer and became too expensive for its health insurance.

Word of the suit comes just one day after another Microsoft worker accused the company of refusing to give him paid disability for surgery related to a brain tumor.

Duncan Sutherland thought he would retire from Microsoft. Now, he finds himself looking for a job at the age of 66.

When he was diagnosed with leukemia several years ago, Duncan says his position as a senior project manager was eliminated. He's suing Microsoft, claiming managers tied his job to performance appraisals that look at "contribution rankings."

According to the suit, such rankings determine how much Sutherland was expected to contribute to the company in the future. Sutherland believes a man in his 60s with cancer is of little "value" to Microsoft.

"How can I have a long-term contribution when most of the people I worked with were in their 30s and healthy. There was just a pervasive feeling that older people were expensive and sick people were more expensive," said Sutherland.

Sutherland's accusations come after we told you the story of Ken Knightley, who is being denied paid time off for brain surgery because Microsoft ties disability pay to performance appraisals. Knightley says his illness caused him to miss several weeks of work last year and that resulted in a negative performance appraisal. When he asked for paid disability, he was told company policy forbids paid leave for workers with less than stellar reviews.

Seattle employment attorney Stephen Teller says he has only heard of issues like this coming up at Microsoft and has been approached by several people claiming similar situations. He says Microsoft appears to be walking a dangerous line of discrimination against sick people.

"It's illegal to discriminate on the basis of a disability," said Teller. "What Microsoft is doing instead is saying, 'We're going to cut an employment benefit because you're not meeting our performance standard.'"

Sutherland not only lost his job, but his stock options and, ultimately, his house.

He says the way Microsoft treats its sick workers isn't healthy.

"It may be a business decision, but it doesn't treat people like people. That, I don't think, is right," he said.

KING 5 continues to hear from former Microsoft workers who have left the company after getting sick and being denied benefits. They are pleading with the company to change its policies or at least allow an appeals process.

Calls for comment to Microsoft Thursday were not returned.

Print
Email
Share
 

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 15 of 28

RuthieMo28170 said on May 9, 2011 at 2:54 PM

The same thing happened to me. I got cancer and as I came back to MS, I couldn't do anything right according to my mgr. My performance continued to take a dive, and I was never able to qualify for paid medical leave. My finances suffered tremendously because of that, but even more I let them convince me that I was good-for-nothing. The recovery has been uphill, but I know I'm going to make it. If Duncan Sutherland's suit moves forward, I suggest a class action suit should be open. I can see now I was not the only one!

66742202
Flag this comment

mloader said on April 27, 2011 at 5:50 PM

I was fired in 2010 after 18 years with Microsoft. I became ill in 2005 and required expensive maintenance medications after that. It never affected my ability to work. When I was told my performance was not up to par (with no evidence to back it up), I mentioned I had a journal which documented incidents of manager misconduct dating back to 2001. That seemed to accelerate the termination process. That journal is now in the process of becoming a book.

65916422
Flag this comment

itpro2010 said on April 25, 2011 at 8:09 PM

Oh, and by the way, I'm another person on the wrong side of Microsoft discriminatory tactics, laid off in 2009. In my case, it wasn't illness, but a particular manager's discrimination against me. This caused my job duties to be downgraded to entry level in retaliation for my raising complaints with management and HR. This manager stairstepped me down over two years from my E/20 record (best reviews you can get) in a position where I was doing duties above level to a downright poor review for duties 20 years below me in ability two years later. And yes, the same manager had done similar to others throughout the years. To those in the know, I'm an A hire. I've brought several similar A hires to the company, one of whom is on partner track. I know A work when I'm doing it, and when I'm not doing it. In that position, I was. And no, I wasn't on a team full of rockstars where I was the weakest link. I had graphs showing my consistent productivity in the top 10-30% of the team

65745942
Flag this comment

itpro2010 said on April 25, 2011 at 7:43 PM

Not surprising. A mid-level (61-63) colleague of mine was cut about 6 months after returning from a long absence for cancer treatment. Granted, he was a 10% material BEFORE this on a team where 20-40 hours of OT was expected, because he wasn't willing to put it in. But still, I do not know how long he was grappling with his condition before the leave, and it's possible that the illness affected his desire to do the OT (for example, suppose this was not his first bout with it, and after his first, he'd decided life was too short to spend 60-80 hours a week at Microsoft). In other news, a more senior, possibly partner, employee had a similar issue, and was not only welcomed back after a long time on disability, but is still there years later. So whatever they're doing, it's not standard across the whole org, across all levels, over the past 5 years. This guy did have his illness a couple years before the GFC austerity campaign, though, so maybe that makes a difference.

65744612
Flag this comment

Trojan22 said on April 23, 2011 at 2:44 PM

This is shameful.. but not a surprise. Microsoft has used a form of "strong arm monopoly" for DECADES in order to dominate the software industry. Most viruses, malware, and worms are directed at Microsoft software since there is a great deal of hatred and animosity towards Microsoft based on the way that they do business. They got rich off Windows 95 when it was a mere "prototype" that the world accepted as a finished product. Even now, Windows 7 is buggy as HELL!

65616754
Flag this comment

vmpolesov said on April 22, 2011 at 11:45 PM

Well, after Mr. Knightley's story we are discovering this is not an isolated practice at microsoft. Anyone who thinks 'performance reviews' have anything to do with 'performance' is not paying attention. 'Performance reviews' are a tool for managers to settle political grudges, get rid of people who had the temerity to disagree with them on technical points, or in this case, to get rid of people with medical expenses.

65583322
Flag this comment

riverman said on April 22, 2011 at 10:55 PM

sleazy big business.

65582092
Flag this comment

NedWen said on April 22, 2011 at 8:04 PM

The same thing happened to me. I'm over fifty, used my five weeks vacation (that you get if you've been there over twelve years), and had increasing medical claims for problems caused by that particular work environment. I knew for a long time that the bad "performance” issues on my reviews were a lame fabrication for an excuse to hire cheaper labor at their discretion. It doesn't make business sense to me, but Microsoft hasn't had business sense since Bill quit.

65574332
Flag this comment

cpenrico24274615 said on April 22, 2011 at 6:23 PM

MS$ - money money money! Maybe if Monkey boy got sick things might change but then again, change just for him.

65568917
Flag this comment

drstrangechaos said on April 22, 2011 at 5:29 PM

As one of the victims of the May 2009 layoff, I have strong suspicions that my high use of medical benefits and my age contributed to my involuntary contribution to Chris Liddell's raising of the stock price of the company. I have heard other stores by people directly involved of Msft abolishing the positions of people with severe health issues. In the case I know of, pressure from other employees made the company retract its abolition of the individual's positioin and benefits. Employees invest in companies with their career plans, the technologies they learn, their health risk management. Companies owe it to the employee to follow through on this unwritten investment. Through corporate influence on politicians, they have gotten away with being able to abdicate their responsibility. I certainly hope that they are brought to task for these kinds of abuses. I agree. Shame on Microsoft and other corporations for not acknowledging the investment of their employees in the company.

65566322
Flag this comment

shoreline said on April 22, 2011 at 4:49 PM

fwkc63, The story doesn't state how long Mr. Sutherland worked for MS, so of course we don't know how much sick leave he may or may not have. As a Senior Project Manager, I would assume he's been there a while, but maybe not. A Senior Project Manager makes solidly in the 6-figure range for salary so COBRA really shouldn't be an issue. Even less of an issue when you know you have a potentially VERY expensive treatment ahead of you. His COBRA couldn't be more than 600-700 per month. Mr. Sutherland presumably didn't get cancer because of his job, so why should any company be held responsible for paying for ANY employee who can't function for the company? It's heartbreaking for anyone to get cancer, but why does it fall on MS to foot his salary and benefits if he's not able to do his job? When did employers become nursemaids?

65564294
Flag this comment

kehbird said on April 22, 2011 at 4:49 PM

Technology will take over everything some day. Almost sad how evil it is if you think about it. Do you see kids playing in the streets anymore? I see most kids on a computer all day. Sounds like microsoft is going sour with the rest of the planet.

65564237
Flag this comment

kak55 said on April 22, 2011 at 3:28 PM

A million dollar company screwing over employees and saving themselves money while creating and using loopholes to do so. Shocking.

65560157
Flag this comment

grizzlyironbear said on April 22, 2011 at 2:37 PM

As a cancer survivor, i can safely say that MS isn't the only company to do this. I was put on medical leave, and then told later that my job was no longer used in the company. As bad as it sucks, it's just business. A business can't go about footing the bill for every person thats sick, late on bills, or other things.

65557509
Flag this comment

fwkc63 said on April 22, 2011 at 2:33 PM

@shoreline - Most, if not all companies that have short term or long term disability require the employee to use all sick leave before they are eligible to go on short/long term disability. I had to do this myself with my company and I had no problem. Oh...and this was based on how long I've worked for the company, NOT performance! As for Cobra...do you any idea what the cost is!? Well I do and its so flippin' high that with no or very little income, nobody can afford it...its ridiculous!!Microsoft is treating their employees like sh**!! Health problems are not intentional and they shouldn't be perceived as such! Pay up MS and stop being so freakin' greedy!!

65557199
Flag this comment

shoreline said on April 22, 2011 at 12:38 PM

I think this story needs more explanation. Did Mr. Sutherland (or Mr. Knightley) have any sick leave accrued? Does Microsoft have sick leave? Doesn't the law allow for both to continue thier health care coverage under COBRA laws? Why, at age 66, was Mr. Sutherlands house at risk? The man was on the cusp of retirement age at 66, did he not plan a little better with long term disability insurance? Any lawyer can twist a story to make the big, uncaring company seem like the bad guy. There's never any shortage of people who are ready to jump on that bandwagon because they make or made poor choices for themselves. Shouldn't ALL job be tied to performance? Why should any company grant PAID time off other than vacation and sick leave? There's too many holes in this story to make any type of educated judgements about how Microsoft is treating employees. One thing I do know. A LOT of MS employees became millionaires because of this company. I do feel for anyone who gets cancer.

65549562
Flag this comment

banditrider said on April 22, 2011 at 11:36 AM

They could pack up and move to India, see how many rights you have there. We have to get a handle on health care as its spinning out of control.

65544902
Flag this comment

stonetrails said on April 22, 2011 at 11:12 AM

Microsoft has been taking money from non employees for years. No one cared about it then. Why should we care now?

65543087
Flag this comment

ithappensallthet said on April 22, 2011 at 10:31 AM

UBUNTU is free

65539387
Flag this comment

mellybelly323 said on April 22, 2011 at 10:30 AM

Absolutely ridiculous! Microsoft should be ashamed!!! I really hope that Bill takes a good, long look at what his company has turned into. They can give away MILLIONS to charity, but they can't afford to be kind to the people who have given their time and effort to the company. SHAME ON YOU, MICROSOFT!

65539209
Flag this comment

wiseone21 said on April 22, 2011 at 9:16 AM

It sounds like not only is MicroSoft discriminating against ailing workers, it is also discriminating against aging and disabled workers. Using a performance review 'loophole' is way too convenient for them. I would call this corporate rape.

65532012
Flag this comment

allboyz said on April 22, 2011 at 8:51 AM

I hope more & more MS employees continue to come forward and make this as public as possible! What they are doing is wrong and they need to be stopped. Kuddos to Mr. Duncan & Mr. Knightley in taking that first step to say NO MORE!

65529599
Flag this comment

fwkc63 said on April 22, 2011 at 8:26 AM

If I were the CEO or anyone in authority for Microsh*t, I would be embarrassed! The way they treat their employees when they are having serious medical problems is absolutely HORRIFIC!! Shame on you, you greedy a-holes!!

65527199
Flag this comment

aziza said on April 22, 2011 at 6:16 AM

Union?

65515277
Flag this comment

nwroamer said on April 22, 2011 at 6:01 AM

What do you expect? I have always referred to that company as MacroShaft! When their ability to rip off the consumer dried up, they then turned on their own staff. This is nothing new, it just goes to show that large corporations only worship the bottom line.

65514097
Flag this comment

sarahinseattle said on April 22, 2011 at 4:13 AM

King 5 - I'm another one that was a victim of this MS policy. I was victim of violence and couldn't "get over it". After being assaulted in my home by someone I knew, I called in sick to work for the first time. Suffered 2 broken vertebrate and physiological trauma I tried to follow medical advice. I was in physical therapy 3 times a week and counseling once a week. Over the next 4 months, 2x my physician had ordered me off work for a week. Completely overloaded and failing miserable at life in general, I reached out to my manager to discuss a leave of absence. (I had not received any performance notations up to this point). Within 48hours of this discussion, my manager gave me a formal performance write up and I had a HR meeting. The next week I requested a LOA and I was denied due to unsatisfactory performance. I quit. There is a vast world outside the Microsoft!! I know I'm a asset and I can live without free soda.

65507982
Flag this comment

bobg303463321625 said on April 22, 2011 at 2:09 AM

Microsoft has long been known in the area as a "slave shop", caring more about profits than people. Cases like these just prove the point.

65504449
Flag this comment

emptynestr said on April 21, 2011 at 5:49 PM

MIcrosoft CAN afford this. SHAME ON Microsoft.. Microsoft you are really ticking a lot of people off about your attitude toward your employees who work hard for you. YOU can do better by your own employees if you can give so generously to other causes.

65483594
Flag this comment