Print
Email
Share

Report: 20-somethings can go 2 years between Paps

by Associated Press and KING Staff

KING5.com

Posted on November 20, 2009 at 8:22 AM

Updated Friday, Nov 20 at 5:20 PM

WASHINGTON, D.C. - First mammograms. Now - in an apparent coincidence - Pap smears.

New guidelines by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists say most women in their 20s can have a Pap smear every two years instead of annually to catch slow-growing cervical cancer.

"We'll still be able to detect it in a timely fashion, yet put women, particularly young women, at less risk," said Dr. Cheryl Iglesia, American College of OBGYNs committee member.

Teenagers are often screened and then treated for abnormalities that experts say usually clear up on their own.

"These patients, based on the fact that they've had minimally abnormal papsmears, wind up getting part of their cervix removed or destroyed and that weakens the cervix causing problems with future pregnancies," said Dr. Howard Jones, cancer specialist at Vanderbilt University.

The change comes amid a separate debate over when regular mammograms to detect breast cancer should begin. The timing of the Pap guidelines is coincidence, said ACOG, which began reviewing its recommendations in late 2007 and published the update Friday in the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology. It leaves women wondering: Why so much furor over mammograms, but not over pap spears? This time, there's more agreement.

 

 

The guidelines also say:

-Routine Paps should start at age 21. Previously, ACOG had urged a first Pap either within three years of first sexual intercourse or at age 21.

-Women 30 and older should wait three years between Paps once they've had three consecutive clear tests. Other national guidelines have long recommended the three-year interval; ACOG had previously backed a two- to three-year wait.

 

 

Paps can spot pre-cancerous changes in the cervix in time to prevent invasive cancer, and widespread use has halved cervical cancer rates in the U.S. in recent decades. About 11,270 new cases will be diagnosed this year, and about 4,070 women will die from it, according to American Cancer Society estimates. Half of women diagnosed with cervical cancer have never had a Pap, and another 10 percent haven't had one in five years.

Cervical cancer is caused by certain strains of the extremely common sexually transmitted virus called HPV, for human papillomavirus. There is a new HPV vaccine that should cut cervical cancer in the future; ACOG's guidelines say for now vaccinated women should follow the same Pap guidelines as the unvaccinated.

But the updated guidelines reflect better understanding of HPV. Infection is high among sexually active teens and young adults. Women's bodies very often fight off an HPV infection on their own without lasting harm, although it can take a year or two. The younger the woman, the more likely that HPV is going to be transient.

Moreover, ACOG cited studies showing no increased risk of cancer developing in women in their 20s if they extended Pap screening from every year to every two years.

As for adolescents, ACOG said cervical cancer in teens is rare - one or two cases per million 15- to 19-year-olds - while HPV-caused cervical abnormalities usually go away on their own, and unnecessary treatment increases the girls' risk of premature labor years later.
 

 

 

-Women with HIV, other immune-weakening conditions or previous cervical abnormalities may need more frequent screening.

 

"Since we feel this is not going to change our ability to screen for cancer, I think we're all in agreement of this recommendation change," said Jones.

Dr. Heidi Gray of the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance hopes the right message gets out there.

"What were not saying is that is women shouldn't come in for regular gynecological exams because there's a lot more going on at the exams than the pap smear which is just one part of it," said Gray.

Women are still urged to get an annual exam every year.

Print
Email
Share

To add a comment, please register or login.

1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 5 of 5

musicfreak said on November 23, 2009 at 11:43 AM

Back in 2000, my doctor told me I'd be okay to go two years between paps. So, I waited until 2002. And had an abnormal pap. The biopsy came back as Phase IV Carcinoma in Situ. Basically one step below full blow cervical cancer. I had 3/4 of my cervix removed and as such, although I didn't want more children, would have to go through having myself stitched up were I to become pregnant again. I wouldn't recommend that to anyone.

32553461
Flag this comment

silverado said on November 21, 2009 at 6:46 PM

Here comes Obama care. Expect more of the same if Reid and Pelosi get their way.

32482736
Flag this comment

thesnowqueen said on November 21, 2009 at 1:54 PM

AMEN appledumpling..........my thoughts EXACTLY. I thought the same thing when they came out with the mamogram " facts". We are doomed.

32474319
Flag this comment

nwkent25 said on November 21, 2009 at 5:03 AM

I think this is a horrible idea...waiting until after 21 to get a PAP?? With teenagers becoming sexually active earlier and earlier girls could go several years before ever seeing a dr for the first time, totally giving cervical cancer the longer time it needs to develop. I will not stop going every year.

32458226
Flag this comment

appledumpling said on November 20, 2009 at 9:50 AM

I guess I'm a bit of a conspiracy theorist...but I'm getting the impression there's an agenda to "dumb down" the American public and compromise the level of health care that's available to folks. It's ironic that all of a sudden we hear that women don't need mammograms at 40 afterall...now you can wait until 50. And then, here's a piece on paps that aren't necessary every year now...every other year will do. It just seems odd to me that all-of-a-sudden, this "research" is coming to the fore front. One way to make government funded health care more affordable is to keep people from going to the doctor all together. I bet you're going to see more of this sort of thing. I think there's an agenda at work to "educate" people that they really don't need as much quality health care as they think they do. Good thing the Obama Administration is looking out for us!

32420656
Flag this comment

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?

Register Now

Member Benefits

Link your account to your Twitter or Facebook account for easier login!

Link your account to your Facebook profile Link your account to your Twitter profile

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

* - Indicates required field

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

Connecting to

You may need to allow pop up window for this step of registration

Just one more step:

Please take a moment to review the available e-mail newsletters has to offer. Place a checkbox next to the newsletters you wish to subscribe to.

Welcome.

Thank you for becoming a member of KING5.com. You now have full access to the best local coverage and late breaking news from KING5.com. Soon you will be redirected to the page you were seeking, and a confirmation email will be delivered to you.

You will need to respond to the confirmation e-mail for your account to be activated.

KING5.com is dedicated to bringing you exceptional news and outstanding information services, all while personalizing it to your liking. We're sure you'll enjoy being a KING5.com member! If you need assistance, please contact us.